All Activity

Was just thinking last night and have a feeling you’d know the answer… Do you reckon the Chelsea’s idea with these 7 + year deals for young players the plan is if they work out and stay at the club for 5 years they are still at a good age to then sell in the 6th year at pure profit whilst having 2yrs minimum left on contract and therefore still hopefully get a decent chunk of money back due to fees always slowly rising with inflation? I dare it would it apply if they just loan them out for 5 years for fees to various club also. The only risk is demotivation or career ending injury early into contract. The upside is less power for the agent to renegotiate and what I stated above.

This is the kind of out-of-the-box thinking we need.

If we really want him, just put in a 50m bid.

Tonali was untouchable and never going to happen until it did. Serie A sides don’t have much of a choice once the offer gets to a certain size.

City hoard via Multi-club ownership but it's not to the degree Chelsea do. This Chelsea stuff is unparalleled. They've always done it uner Roman but not to this extent.

Aye. I guess its similar to us with Isak, he isn't for sale, but if an insane offer came in we'd have to look at it.

Besiktas interested in Tammy Abraham. "We should be all over that!"

I got this as that they accept that our bid is fair given the recent injuries and unlikely to get more for him from anyone else this summer. BUT they think his real value to them is higher so long as he maintains fitness. therefore he isn’t a player that they can sell

This is what the transfer window is all about. These are the bits that are enjoyable.

The amount of made up lies in that thread has even exceeded their usual showing. What a bunch of sad cunts they are. As said by Wallsendmag above, the fuckers are absolutely broken since the takeover, and that's increasing rapidly

Caniggia at Dundee.

Why did I waste my time watching his highlight video?

NUFC: €40m for Scalvini Atalanta: fuck off and die, you absolute cunts. NUFC: €41m Atalanta:

So just to get this straight there's something wrong with people turning up at Newcastle Airport wearing a Newcastle top but if someone rocks up there in a Sunderland top then that's "classy"? They are utterly deranged. An absolute parody of a fanbase. Any slight rhyme, reason or ability to have any sort of rational thought with that lot disappeared on 7th October 2021 and it's never to return. They are too far gone now. Whilst it's funny for us and gives people a good laugh, and offers plenty of content for that Deluded World of RTG site on X, it's also pretty tragic really. Basically living their football supporting lives through another club. Whether it's a concert at SJP, seeing another human out and about in a NUFC top, worrying about Mags taking over areas that they believe more Sunderland fans should live in etc, it literally consumes their lives amd in such a negative way. Honestly if football made me feel like that I'd genuinely wrap it all in. There's just zero enjoyment in getting yourself so worked up about such trivial things. Football is supposed to be enjoyable, a bit of relief from everyday pressures. For them it just sends their blood pressure soaring further.

Nobody is unsellable realistically. Everyone has their price, this has been true in football since forever and I doubt that has changed. The question more is a team willing to pay what they want? If a club is saying a player is unsellable I'm gonna assume more often than not that it's just posturing.

our bid was so desultory they pulled him off the market completely

Who exactly are we talking about here? Haaland, Wirtz that level? No we can't afford the wages of those players but that's not to do with their ability, as much as their valuation, which aren't always the same thing. For example we signed Isak, who's at the very least comparable to Haaland. We've signed Tonali who id bracket as being an elite midfielder. Liverpool have won loads in the last 6/7 years and they didn't sign "the cream of the crop", they paid boatloads for VVD from... Southampton which quite a few scoffed at. They signed Allison and Salah from Italy and neither would be classed as entirely unattainable to us now. They also built their squad with some really smart signings: Robertson, Firmino, Wijnaldum, Henderson, Milner to name a few. In short, my point is that you dont need to sign known superstars, you need to sign unknown superstars. Which isn't easy but do-able.

As a gamer, Digitiser was always my first port of call upon waking. Then, as a teenager, I managed to 'hook up' via a teletext chat page. I think it was 50p a message but worth every penny.

“‘It's great that the window opens on June 1,’ he said. ‘The challenge is for us to sign players in early June. But it doesn't always work like that. I hope in reality it does, but it rarely works like that.“

Weren’t there rumours that Scalvini has a release clause?

If you look closely there are no quotation marks in the article you’ve copied and paste which I’m sure you know what that means in a journalistic sense? Post the link please to examine further but even what you’ve posted confirms exactly what i said. “It doesn’t always work out like that” is the takeaway you need.

Agreed Chelsea are by far the worst of the worst Man City are operating from a huge advantageous position but their scouting and generally how they operate is professional, efficient and slick. They don't tend to 'overbuy' - just identify what they need and just get on with it. It's always not the most obvious names either, so they have a good scouting network. Liverpool are also benefitting from being way ahead but again, they buy and sell pretty well. Chelsea are blatant and so boring. Tosin is actually a prime example - they did NOT need him at all. He wasn't better than their CB's and they only seemed to show an interest because he was free. Man U also operate with impunity - crazy level of debt, miserable transfer record but seemingly impervious to the damage. Dust worself off and go again. Any other club would be doing an Everton if they had even half the recent record of Man U. The way before was the young wonderkids would go to the second tier clubs, Leverkusen, Leipzig, Ajax, Villareal, Atlanta etc, establish themselves and then the big clubs would swoop but the money would be distributed. Now the hype is so huge that even the Barca's and Madrids are going for young prodigies like Roony and Guler. I'm sure if it was a free market, it would be interesting to see if Newcastle could spend their way to the top - even if it was organically, like one or two big players a season. Same with Villa, Spurs etc. Under Ashley, he never spent so competing was pointless. Now, we can't spend, so there is also a level of pointlessness here too. When you're hamstrung deliberately, footballers have short careers. Isak and Bruno were promised title runs - which probably could have been the case by now if we'd been allowed to spend. PSR then actually does its job even through the back door as the top players get impatient and want to play for the 'top clubs' already challenging... and then we have to start again Man City were allowed to get their spine with no limit that led them to their PL - Aguero, KDB, Yaya Toure, Hart, Kompany. Chelsea ditto under Mourinho.

Classic Italian bargaining https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4lsudbAI9v/?hl=en

well then