Fatwax

Because Sissoko is a showreel player who looks good when he's on the telly, but there's a reason people were slagging him off for the majority of last season and the season before. He has fantastic ability at times, but he doesn't play for the cause, he plays for himself. That is why people are hoping he will fail, because if he had actually made an effort earlier we may not have been relegated. And yeah, he's not the only player to be guilty of not putting in th effort, but I know that if I mess up or I'm part of a problem I do what I can to fix it as much as possible, I don't bail at the first opportunity - or even well before that. We were on our arse at Christmas and he was constantly bleating on about how he deserved better. Given wanted out and jumped ship, but at least he had something to show for it and he didn't drag it all out in the press. There's a way to do things and Sissoko went about things the wrong way.

Or our last away game against them in the championship. 3-0 and a miserable night with the exception of Fitz Hall merking their players by the cornerflag. My only away game that season

And index finger lengthened.

Aye, throwing yellows around in the first half like they were going out of fashion.

Barnsley have 12.... Forest 11 ok, fine. So if you discount: Barnsley - 12 Forest - 11 Burton - 10 and then go on to discount the following who all have the same as us: Huddersfield QPR Brighton Wigan I think you will find that we are infact top league goalscorers. Check your facts Fair enough I like the goals against column. It's been a long time since we conceded so few, ok it's the Championship but still. It's nice to see so few flying in. Aye, it feels weird to not have a feeling of shame when looking at the goal difference. To be honest I thought we had +12 goals, I read Barnsley's as ours by accident

Barnsley have 12.... Forest 11 ok, fine. So if you discount: Barnsley - 12 Forest - 11 Burton - 10 and then go on to discount the following who all have the same as us: Huddersfield QPR Brighton Wigan I think you will find that we are infact top league goalscorers. Check your facts

Barnsley have 12....

Can't read league tables properly

Not the contract side of things, of course not. He is in charge of all football matters however, as per his contract. Benitez isn't a pushover like McClaren was, he wouldn't stand for some of the bullshit of previous years, just like Keegan didn't. EDIT - in reply to mighty__mag

It's only gameweek 5.

2-1 to Bristol! Unlucky Villa

Bristol equalise against Villa.

Palace bottom of the league

He's a 1 in 4 striker over the course of his career thus far according to wiki.. almost exactly that in fact. My thoughts - not an exciting name, but I'd rather him than Riviere, who is total dogshit.

And he was all around poor. Bar the beaut of that Klinsmann penalty save. Very good kicker of the ball though. A bit off topic here, but can anyone link me to a youtube video or something which illustrates what good distribution (not wordly goal kicks that happenes 1 out of 1 000 000 000 000 times) for a keeper is? I´ve never seen what was/is so bad about Givens, Harpers or Kruls distribution. Surely as long as the ball isn´t passed short or thrown out, the goal kick "quality" doesn´t mean s*** as outfield players from both teams will have ample time to position and contend for the ball anyway. Harper wasn't too bad with his, but he went through a stage of kicking it where he looking like he'd been kicked in the stomach each time. It was bizarre. Krul has always had bad distribution... A clue is how many go out of play or no where near our outlets. Or how many he slices and so immediately puts pressure on the side.

And he was all around poor. Bar the beaut of that Klinsmann penalty save. Very good kicker of the ball though. A bit off topic here, but can anyone link me to a youtube video or something which illustrates what good distribution (not wordly goal kicks that happenes 1 out of 1 000 000 000 000 times) for a keeper is? I´ve never seen what was/is so bad about Givens, Harpers or Kruls distribution. Surely as long as the ball isn´t passed short or thrown out, the goal kick "quality" doesn´t mean s*** as outfield players from both teams will have ample time to position and contend for the ball anyway. Harper wasn't too bad with his, but he went through a stage of kicking it where he looking like he'd been kicked in the stomach each time. It was bizarre. Krul has always had bad distribution... A clue is how many go out of play or no where near our outlets.

Gerrin, mid table at last. And like f*ck are Chelsea more hated than Man U Of course they are they have no youth policy, hoover up any player they want and leave them to rot, they have only ever won by spending vast amounts of money. There's no real culture, their fans are racists... despicable club.

Cheers for the info That first goal is brilliant.

Where are people watching this?

Yeah, you go Fatwax!

Amazing reference

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/06/28/00/35BC831500000578-3663127-image-a-34_1467070664653.jpg Jesus, that's one hairy harm she has! Married too

After the Reading loss he said they'd stay in the premier league, no problems whatsoever. They were then relegated.

Nah, he had one big injury and then just wasn't picked by Roeder as I recall. The likes of Dyer and Cort were ridiculous in terms of injuries.