Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 For £250K we should get him, who else are we going to get for the rest of the season? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 For £250K we should get him, who else are we going to get for the rest of the season? You tell us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Nile Ranger starting games in all likelyhood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macca888 Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 If Ashley and Co. object to this loan fee, it will only show how hypocritical they are considering the fact they charged Stoke City a substantial loan fee for Ameobi a couple of years back. Like some others on here, I would send Harewood back regardless because if Ranger is to get the experience needed to operate in the PL, he will need to get as much game time as possible during the remainder of this CC campaign as his learning period. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Ranger may be ready for the PL in 3 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 He was fucking wank against Sheff Wed. I'd go for (Paul, lol) Kitson if he's still available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Ranger may be ready for the PL in 3 years. Not to disagree, but how do you suggest we get him ready if not giving him a chance in the league below? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Unfortunately he's a decent impact sub but will only start at the club's detriment. When we get promoted i'd loan him out to a championship club, plenty should be interested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Unfortunately he's a decent impact sub but will only start at the club's detriment. When we get promoted i'd loan him out to a championship club, plenty should be interested. So we'd be giving him games at the level we can do ourselves now (but benefitting someone other than us). Why would plenty be interested if he's not good enough to start games as you suggest? Doesn't make sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 250k is nowt tbh. especially if he keeps scoring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 This was Kezman shouts if we went for elsewhere other than Marlon: Get ready. Kevin Philips would be a laugh but more chance of Hughton playing 4-3-3 But that sort of player basically. Federico Macheda who as well as being a poacher actually has a bit of touch and class about him and would play well of a big striker like Rossi can. Garry O'Connor is another one of Birminghams players but I think he is injured. Nathan Delfounso - Harewoods team-mate, he'll be on less and while I've only seen him along side Ranger his dribbling looked very good for a young gun K.Phillips would be the one but we just could not go there at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Unfortunately he's a decent impact sub but will only start at the club's detriment. When we get promoted i'd loan him out to a championship club, plenty should be interested. So we'd be giving him games at the level we can do ourselves now (but benefitting someone other than us). Why would plenty be interested if he's not good enough to start games as you suggest? Doesn't make sense. Because if kept Harewood we'd have 4 of the best strikers in the league. Team's like Scunthorpe and Plymouth obviously don't have that luxury. Leeds would probably be interested btw, they're going up and beyond Beckford and Luciano they have nowt up front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Meh. I'd take Phillips; it'd hurt the Mackems more than it would hurt us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Dave Kitson > Kevin Phillips. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I'd take Macheda, obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Unfortunately he's a decent impact sub but will only start at the club's detriment. When we get promoted i'd loan him out to a championship club, plenty should be interested. So we'd be giving him games at the level we can do ourselves now (but benefitting someone other than us). Why would plenty be interested if he's not good enough to start games as you suggest? Doesn't make sense. Because if kept Harewood we'd have 4 of the best strikers in the league. Team's like Scunthorpe and Plymouth obviously don't have that luxury. Leeds would probably be interested btw, they're going up and beyond Beckford and Luciano they have nowt up front. We were on about Ranger, can you address the conflict in your post? Why would he interest other clubs if he's not good enough to start at this level? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Harewood > kitson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Unfortunately he's a decent impact sub but will only start at the club's detriment. When we get promoted i'd loan him out to a championship club, plenty should be interested. So we'd be giving him games at the level we can do ourselves now (but benefitting someone other than us). Why would plenty be interested if he's not good enough to start games as you suggest? Doesn't make sense. Because if kept Harewood we'd have 4 of the best strikers in the league. Team's like Scunthorpe and Plymouth obviously don't have that luxury. Leeds would probably be interested btw, they're going up and beyond Beckford and Luciano they have nowt up front. We were on about Ranger, can you address the conflict in your post? Why would he interest other clubs if he's not good enough to start at this level? There are lower level championship clubs that's he'd be good enough to start for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Harewood > kitson. You lie to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I've no idea who the alternatives are, and I don't think anyone on here does. With us being top then some other Premier League options may be available to us; both youngsters and older types. They might be better bets than Harewood, though if it's the former it seems daft to not just give Ranger a proper go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 According to FM Zaki is available for about 1.2 million and he doesn't mind a small contract. Lets do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Kevin Phillips wouldnt touch us. Out of love for the scum down the road and the fact he just dosent like us, I've never ever heard him say owt positive about us while being a pundit. I remember at the start of the season he was asked to predict the championship's top 6, we wernt even in it, the thick cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 I think we'd be mad not to extend his loan until the season's end (if we had the opportunity) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 I wouldn't extend it, we've got 4 forwards who need games and we need midfielders more than anything, that's where we should be looking to spend whatever we have for players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 I wouldn't extend it, we've got 4 forwards who need games and we need midfielders more than anything, that's where we should be looking to spend whatever we have for players. Agreed. Lovenkrands really should have played more games than he has. I think he would better Harewood's goal ratio for us with a continued run in the side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now