Guest firetotheworks Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 SWP is f***ing s***. He can f*** off. I don't care if he would improve us, I hate that braindead t***. I could just type 'this' and be done with it, but I never pass up an opportunity to have a go at SWP. He's a bag of wank. I hate the meandering dwarf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VegasToon Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Santa Cruz on loan would be great. I'd rather have him back up Carroll then fooking Shola. Injuries can happen, we need some depth. The rest can just fook off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest n4e Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 SWP is f***ing s***. He can f*** off. I don't care if he would improve us, I hate that braindead t***. I could just type 'this' and be done with it, but I never pass up an opportunity to have a go at SWP. He's a bag of wank. I hate the meandering dwarf. 'Wrighty' is a cunt aswell. Must be where he got it from. Hate the pair of them. I'm pretty sure Bradley is a cock aswell iirc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 SWP would be awful behind the strikers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I would be happy to bring SWP on loan, whenever he's been a regualar starter he has been impressive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Of the three (SWP, Santa Cruz and Caicedo) I think I'd prefer Caicedo given that: a) He's not a perma-crock b) He's quick 3) He probably feels like he has something to prove d) He's not SWP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I'd just like to echo the hate for SWP. Never forgiven the little wanker for the dive to get Elliott sent off in the cup, and he's fucking shite to boot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 RSC: 19 games 3 goals. Shola is better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Not exactly a massive SWP fan but I'm afraid he'd definitely add to the squad. It won't happen mind you. Can't see him going anywhere, he's a perfect reserve player for City. Santa doesn't have the same status however, and could be looking for a move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I would be happy to bring SWP on loan, whenever he's been a regualar starter he has been impressive. No he hasn't! Not quick as some think no end product and no invention. A symbol of the overhyping that English players get Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Isn't there a Premier League rule that states we can only loan one player from another Premiership club? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Well we haven't got anyone from Man City atm, so we're pretty safe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Given the bunch of Godzillas that Mancini fielded last night, I don't think SWP is his type of player. Like Ireland, he's not the greatest defensively. I've not seen SWP in a central role behind a striker, but I've often thought that it could work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 We could do with cover for Enrique. Another forward, hopefully with pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Given the bunch of Godzillas that Mancini fielded last night, I don't think SWP is his type of player. Like Ireland, he's not the greatest defensively. You know, saying that, he also doesn't feel like a Hughton signing either, all questions of position or talent aside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I just hope it's not Santa Cruz.. I like the guy but there's no way we can play with two target man.. Even if he would come here to sit on the bench, would it be wise to pay 60k or whatever for a back-up player with a bad fitness record.. NO IT WOULDN'T! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Santa Cruz is not a target man, he just happens to be tall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Santa Cruz is not a target man, he just happens to be tall. Target of hate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Apparently Holloway is interested in Leon Best! *Daily Star Alert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 They got it from the NOTW. Most reliable rumour ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I reckon SWP would be good for us because his pace will be used. For the bigger teams who control possession, his lack of control means that he's useless when they're constructing attacks, but for someone like us who'll be looking to counter-attack almost every team when we're away from home, he'd be an excellent outlet because he's just so pacy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 SWP would be awful behind the strikers. Really? He was good enough for England a few months ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Chelsea absolutely ruined SWP. I've heard many a City fan say that he's just not been the same player in his second stint that they remembered from before he went to Stamford Bridge. If he could get back to the player he was 6 years ago then he would be an awesome signing for us. If he's the same one that's been knocking about the last two seasons then I'd rather we stayed clear of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Chelsea absolutely ruined SWP. I've heard many a City fan say that he's just not been the same player in his second stint that they remembered from before he went to Stamford Bridge. If he could get back to the player he was 6 years ago then he would be an awesome signing for us. If he's the same one that's been knocking about the last two seasons then I'd rather we stayed clear of him. Fully agree. Really seems to have gone backwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Chelsea absolutely ruined SWP. I've heard many a City fan say that he's just not been the same player in his second stint that they remembered from before he went to Stamford Bridge. If he could get back to the player he was 6 years ago then he would be an awesome signing for us. If he's the same one that's been knocking about the last two seasons then I'd rather we stayed clear of him. Something similar happened with Scott Parker as well. Who was a fine attacking player for Charlton before he signed for Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts