Jump to content

Loïc Remy


Guest bimpy474

Recommended Posts

Regardless of whether you think it will be successful or not, the club is right to appeal. It was a preposterous red card. Not appealing because they know the system is ridiculous is tacitly giving that system credence.

:clap:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like many have said surprised to hear we've appealed it after AP's comments although thinking about them he did lay the blame with the other player and crowd reaction that followed... Norwich appealing must've changed our minds on in at least to the point that it was a no loose situation as it can't be deemed frivolous then...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

It was a preposterous red card.

 

I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it?  100% stupidity.

 

Can't do what?

 

Stare at other players.

 

Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a preposterous red card.

 

I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it?  100% stupidity.

 

Can't do what?

 

Basically push your forehead to someone else'.  If it's seen it's always going to be a red, like I've said before people were happy enough to see reina go when he done it to perch.

 

Just don't think it was 'prepostrous'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it.

 

I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident.

 

I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it.

 

I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident.

 

I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up?

I think Remy reacted in the 1st place to a kick across his mid riff.

 

It was a soft red for both of them but still think it was right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it.

 

I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident.

 

I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up?

 

Even if the FA can't identify any evidence of Remy moving his head foward after they'd square up, they'll stand behind their ref (at least publicly) and say the red was for the two-handed push, or professional misconduct or some bollocks. Shocked if it gets turned over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it.

 

I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident.

 

I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up?

 

It was just squaring up, but the pushes of each other before didn't help. Johnson falling away as if he'd been headbutted when they did square up was cheating, and he's done that before.

 

I cant see them clearing either, there's enough for the FA to make the cards stand. I think yellow for both would have been enough but it's about opinions i suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

From one of those FB pages:

 

Mackems v Geordies

Sneaky cheating Geordies waiting to appeal Rapist Remy's Red card so that it wouldn't be heard before the Derby meaning he can play ! Must be bricking it ya scruffy unwashed tramps / CM

 

:mung:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Brazilianbob

Be nice if they took our wrongly disallowed goal against city into account and gave us the benefit of any tenuous doubt to rescind Remy's red card.  It aint going to happen tho because we a not part of the EPL elite

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are my mackem friends frothing at the gash and telling me he spat on a player too? Just another lie from RTG which has been repeated until its fact I'm guessing.

 

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/remy-appeal.870725/

 

If they're telling you, does this mean you work at the FA? If so is there any chance you could, you know, let him off. Just for the crack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...