Chrisjraby Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Never getting overturned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Regardless of whether you think it will be successful or not, the club is right to appeal. It was a preposterous red card. Not appealing because they know the system is ridiculous is tacitly giving that system credence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Like many have said surprised to hear we've appealed it after AP's comments although thinking about them he did lay the blame with the other player and crowd reaction that followed... Norwich appealing must've changed our minds on in at least to the point that it was a no loose situation as it can't be deemed frivolous then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Think they'll use the Shelvey/Debuchy incident as an example. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andymc1 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Stare at other players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Stare at other players. Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Basically push your forehead to someone else'. If it's seen it's always going to be a red, like I've said before people were happy enough to see reina go when he done it to perch. Just don't think it was 'prepostrous'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 He pushed his forehead into another player, how is it not a red card? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 And god dammit someone change my bloody username! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? I think Remy reacted in the 1st place to a kick across his mid riff. It was a soft red for both of them but still think it was right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 And god dammit someone change my bloody username! Due to your recent record can we not just change it to Joe Kinnear and have a small hope that he's off too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? Even if the FA can't identify any evidence of Remy moving his head foward after they'd square up, they'll stand behind their ref (at least publicly) and say the red was for the two-handed push, or professional misconduct or some bollocks. Shocked if it gets turned over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 And god dammit someone change my bloody username! http://www.quickmeme.com/img/8f/8f0af0656edc0cfc69d15cc8956e171105b6c9d4276decc3e30da833cbd64704.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? It was just squaring up, but the pushes of each other before didn't help. Johnson falling away as if he'd been headbutted when they did square up was cheating, and he's done that before. I cant see them clearing either, there's enough for the FA to make the cards stand. I think yellow for both would have been enough but it's about opinions i suppose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Appealed? Surprised at that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Guess we'd look stupid if Norwich won the appeal and we didnt appeal at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 From one of those FB pages: Mackems v Geordies Sneaky cheating Geordies waiting to appeal Rapist Remy's Red card so that it wouldn't be heard before the Derby meaning he can play ! Must be bricking it ya scruffy unwashed tramps / CM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brazilianbob Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Be nice if they took our wrongly disallowed goal against city into account and gave us the benefit of any tenuous doubt to rescind Remy's red card. It aint going to happen tho because we a not part of the EPL elite Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Well this is pointless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why are my mackem friends frothing at the gash and telling me he spat on a player too? Just another lie from RTG which has been repeated until its fact I'm guessing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why are my mackem friends frothing at the gash and telling me he spat on a player too? Just another lie from RTG which has been repeated until its fact I'm guessing. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/remy-appeal.870725/ If they're telling you, does this mean you work at the FA? If so is there any chance you could, you know, let him off. Just for the crack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noodles Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 My thoughts are that the higher ups have probably read the referees report and that the sending off was for the ghost headbutt. If you appeal on those grounds there might be a chance. . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now