Slim Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 They both pushed each other and should have got yellows. By the law when Remy puts his head on Johnson its a sending off. By the law I mean how things ar judged now even if they are crazy. But Johnson should not have been sent off by the law also. He should be done for diving but nothing he did is a sending off....should be though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 This sport is a joke from top to bottom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 .com Presumably the FA stance is that Remy head butted Johnson (he didn't) and that Johnson wasn't overly aggressive. That's despite the Norwich player initiating the incident, aiming a kick at Remy, pushing the Newcastle player away and then feigning injury. There is of course one other difference; namely that Chris Hughton sought to defend his player and refused to comment on Remy, while Alan Pardew publicly accepted that the red card for his man was justified - and then made negative comments about Johnson's conduct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 .com while Alan Pardew publicly accepted that the red card for his man was justified - and then made negative comments about Johnson's conduct. He's done this for literally every red card we've had under him fwiw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Now that is a complete f***ing joke. I can't whinge about the ban but how does Johnson get his rescinded? Both players shoved each other, both put their head in, what's the difference? Johnson faking being headbutted is regarded ok it seems. What an absolute joke. It is but the big difference is Norwich didn't have a useless c*** of a manager going a post match interview saying it was a red - he really is an utter c*** that bloke. there was more than enough precedent that it was a red denying the obvious wouldn't have helped anything so why he fuck appeal then?? don't have a clue always looked a complete waste of time to me, the only surprise for me is they didn't throw in an extra game for wasting their time How is there "precedent" when Jonjo Shelvey made a much more prominent gesture towards Debuchy two months ago and the FA said it "did not constitute violent conduct"? off the top of my head Reina vs Perch and Barton got done retrospectively for something similar while at QPR (vs Norwich I think) both 3 game bans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Probably didn't help that Pardew admitted it should stand, like. Everyone seems to have missed this post. It's open and shut in the FA's eyes, Pardew said he should have been sent off the FA most likely read them comments and laughed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It's amazing that the FA has managed to make me angry on this one. I was fully expecting no change from the FA, given they don't like to look like they've made a mistake... But rescinding Johnson's and upholding remy's?! the FA are very special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Now that is a complete f***ing joke. I can't whinge about the ban but how does Johnson get his rescinded? Both players shoved each other, both put their head in, what's the difference? Johnson faking being headbutted is regarded ok it seems. What an absolute joke. It is but the big difference is Norwich didn't have a useless c*** of a manager going a post match interview saying it was a red - he really is an utter c*** that bloke. there was more than enough precedent that it was a red denying the obvious wouldn't have helped anything so why he fuck appeal then?? don't have a clue always looked a complete waste of time to me, the only surprise for me is they didn't throw in an extra game for wasting their time How is there "precedent" when Jonjo Shelvey made a much more prominent gesture towards Debuchy two months ago and the FA said it "did not constitute violent conduct"? off the top of my head Reina vs Perch and Barton got done retrospectively for something similar while at QPR (vs Norwich I think) both 3 game bans Er yeah, when Bradley Johnson threw himself to the floor again. Why did Shelvey not get a ban when he did it? Precedent seems to be that if one party pretends they've been struck, it's a ban, if they don't, then it's not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It's amazing that the FA has managed to make me angry on this one. I was fully expecting no change from the FA, given they don't like to look like they've made a mistake... But rescinding Johnson's and upholding remy's?! the FA are very special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It's times like this when you do wonder if / why there is an anti Newcastle sentiment within the FA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unsurprising Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was pointless appealing after Pardews post match comments basically saying the referee was right to send Remy off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I think its time this mysterious panel took a leaf out of the NHL's book. When the NHL hand out a ban they send out a video explaining why the player is banned and why they gave him the length of the ban. A full explenation!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Thought Remy deserved a red and Johnson a yellow at the time, and if anything the referee's decision to send Johnson off was harsh and seemed to be a case of "well, I sent the other guy off for losing it, and the entire opposition team are on my back now, plus the other guy seems to be trying to hide from me - may as well even things out here". Going to watch it again as by the reaction in here I feel like I saw an entirely different incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I think its time this mysterious panel took a leaf out of the NHL's book. When the NHL hand out a ban they send out a video explaining why the player is banned and why they gave him the length of the ban. A full explenation!! It really would be great to have an FA like that. Fucking hate these totalitarian cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Thought Remy deserved a red and Johnson a yellow at the time, and if anything the referee's decision to send Johnson off was harsh and seemed to be a case of "well, I sent the other guy off for losing it, and the entire opposition team are on my back now, plus the other guy seems to be trying to hide from me - may as well even things out here". Going to watch it again as by the reaction in here I feel like I saw an entirely different incident. That's how I saw it, although I would say "expected" rather than "deserved." I think it's utterly ridiculous that a player will be sent off and miss a further 3 games for that, but we've seen it happen so many times before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillClinton Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I think its time this mysterious panel took a leaf out of the NHL's book. When the NHL hand out a ban they send out a video explaining why the player is banned and why they gave him the length of the ban. A full explenation!! but then they wouldn't be able to show any bias.. When's the last time we had any FA decision go our way? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Now that is a complete f***ing joke. I can't whinge about the ban but how does Johnson get his rescinded? Both players shoved each other, both put their head in, what's the difference? Johnson faking being headbutted is regarded ok it seems. What an absolute joke. It is but the big difference is Norwich didn't have a useless c*** of a manager going a post match interview saying it was a red - he really is an utter c*** that bloke. there was more than enough precedent that it was a red denying the obvious wouldn't have helped anything so why he fuck appeal then?? don't have a clue always looked a complete waste of time to me, the only surprise for me is they didn't throw in an extra game for wasting their time How is there "precedent" when Jonjo Shelvey made a much more prominent gesture towards Debuchy two months ago and the FA said it "did not constitute violent conduct"? off the top of my head Reina vs Perch and Barton got done retrospectively for something similar while at QPR (vs Norwich I think) both 3 game bans Er yeah, when Bradley Johnson threw himself to the floor again. Why did Shelvey not get a ban when he did it? Precedent seems to be that if one party pretends they've been struck, it's a ban, if they don't, then it's not. Debuchy didn't cheat essentially. Fucked up system but there was never a hope the FA would overturn it they have the slightest of movement by Remy to Johnson to hide behind and declare it by their standards as far worse than leg breaking tackles Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 What happened to that FA overhaul that was supposed to happen? Is that the maximum transparency they'll give on how a decision has been reached? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Thought Remy deserved a red and Johnson a yellow at the time, and if anything the referee's decision to send Johnson off was harsh and seemed to be a case of "well, I sent the other guy off for losing it, and the entire opposition team are on my back now, plus the other guy seems to be trying to hide from me - may as well even things out here". Going to watch it again as by the reaction in here I feel like I saw an entirely different incident. Watch from the beginning. Kicking, shoving from cnut Johnson, then acting of the highest order simply to con the ref. Now he gets off scot-free. Unbelievable, shocking, seemingly-biased decision, no two-ways about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I think its time this mysterious panel took a leaf out of the NHL's book. When the NHL hand out a ban they send out a video explaining why the player is banned and why they gave him the length of the ban. A full explenation!! but then they wouldn't be able to show any bias.. When's the last time we had any FA decision go our way? Perfect example of a ban http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?catid=60 Perfect example of why its not a ban, great insight. http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?catid=60 Howay FA do the same, explain yourselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Way to stop cheating, FA, well done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Not surprising about Remy, but an absolute joke that Johnson gets off. FA are fucking ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Same old s*** from the FA. Bradley Johnson "raised his hands" first by aggressively shoving Remy (after fouling and kicking him). I thought "raising your hands" wasn't allowed? Remy should be allowed to headbutt Bradley Johnson using the double jeopardy defence ("a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same charges"). Remy has already been punished for the 'crime' so he may as well commit it. This time Remy can actually headbutt Bradley Johnson and Johnson won't have to pretend this time either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 He's rubbish anyway, we should get De Jong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now