ianovthetoon Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Bearing in mind they gained millions from the games he played last year which helped keep them up I suppose it would have been a bit of a cheek. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 http://i.imgur.com/1NiMbXr.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 And of course if they did sue something might emerge about how much they actually knew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Bearing in mind they gained millions from the games he played last year which helped keep them up I suppose it would have been a bit of a cheek. Hundreds of billions in TV money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 And of course if they did sue something might emerge about how much they actually knew This is it for me, surely you would sue as matter of principal, the money might be pennies but it would send out a strong signal. Letting it fly says they knew more than they admitted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 It does seem pretty sketchy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Bailey Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Smells fishy this to me. You would have thought they would be wanting to use any chance to clear the 'guilt' of the club by playing him and appearing to stick by him, sueing him would have been a chance to say to the world they were lied too. Methinks they knew more or just didn't ask. Johnson was sacked by Sunderland after pleading guilty to grooming PA:Press Association EXCLUSIVE by DAVID COVERDALE 00:01, 18 Feb 2016 Maybe he will report next that Johnson was just 'gulity of love', and he only wanted to 'slide it in'..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 They had to have known man, had to!!! And if they didn't they did their utmost to avoid finding out. After what came out last week about how he said at the time of his arrest he thought she was 16 they must have known that something had actually happened and as she was under age they would surely have put two and two together. But ignored it and played him anyway. I'm adamant they knew what had happened. There should be an FA investigation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 And of course if they did sue something might emerge about how much they actually knew This is it for me, surely you would sue as matter of principal, the money might be pennies but it would send out a strong signal. Letting it fly says they knew more than they admitted. What signal? "Don't be a nonce while playing for us"? They probably just don't want anything to do with it anymore and distance themselves from it as much as possible. Move on and all that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Stacey Flounders is not in the public gallery at Adam Johnson’s child sexual offences trial for the second day running. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Floundering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Best not think of the children. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 It does put an odd twist on the saying "staying together for the kids". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 just thought he could probably nick off to china or qatar and play as they probably wouldnt care... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 just thought he could probably nick off to china or qatar and play as they probably wouldnt care... After his release he'll be either tagged or at least on licence and won't be allowed to travel abroad I'd have thought at least until he no longer has to sign the sex offenders register by which time he'll be over 40 anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 just thought he could probably nick off to china or qatar and play as they probably wouldnt care... Or the Philippines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 just thought he could probably nick off to china or qatar and play as they probably wouldnt care... Or the Philippines Or Rotherham then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie1892 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 And of course if they did sue something might emerge about how much they actually knew This is it for me, surely you would sue as matter of principal, the money might be pennies but it would send out a strong signal. Letting it fly says they knew more than they admitted. What signal? "Don't be a nonce while playing for us"? They probably just don't want anything to do with it anymore and distance themselves from it as much as possible. Move on and all that That's Nonce Sense, isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 A friend of the complainant in the case facing Adam Johnson has told the court he is "a bit of a paedophile". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 'a bit of a paedophile' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 http://m.sunderlandecho.com/live/event?1834584 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 A friend of the complainant in the case facing Adam Johnson has told the court he is "a bit of a paedophile". Christ. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Which bit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Friend of the complainant guys, come on. He's probably much less of a paedophile than that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 A friend of the complainant in the case facing Adam Johnson has told the court he is "a bit of a paedophile". :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts