Jump to content

NUFC transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/newcastle-united-alan-pardew-vows-to-replace-yohan-cabaye-in-the-summer-9213260.html

Asked if Cabaye’s exit had forced the club to recalibrate their ambitions for the remainder of the season, Pardew said: “It’s fair to say the transfer made it harder to qualify for Europe – and I don’t think anyone would disagree with that – because we couldn’t replace him. But that doesn’t mean to say we can’t replace him in the summer.

 

“We know we have got good players here, but we do need that controller of the ball, that manoeuvrer, that clever player, and we will get one in the summer, for sure.”

 

:lol:

 

Aye, the guy's absolutely gagging to be in Europe like. We're 5 points off with only 30 left to play for; the chase is well and truly over. :(

 

It is like, tbf to the cunt.

 

We're eight points off tbf. Seventh won't give Europe with the teams in the FA Cup semis being who they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan Pardew has confirmed Newcastle United's interest in Chelsea striker Romelu Lukaku.

 

''I think he is a player a lot of clubs will be looking at in the summer. I don't think Everton will get a free run at him''

 

More loans :sweetjesus:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mourinho should just start him instead.

 

Nah he's not good enough, but in any case they will buy someone better.

 

Not good enough for what?  He's the best striker they currently have anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mourinho should just start him instead.

 

Nah he's not good enough, but in any case they will buy someone better.

 

Of course he's good enough. Eto'o and Torres have been caretakers, not relied upon to carry the attack. Lukaku could at least do the same and provide a more physical presence. In addition to being younger and having far more upside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mourinho should just start him instead.

 

Nah he's not good enough, but in any case they will buy someone better.

 

Of course he's good enough. Eto'o and Torres have been caretakers, not relied upon to carry the attack. Lukaku could at least do the same and provide a more physical presence. In addition to being younger and having far more upside.

 

There's still uncertainty to him that I doubt Mourinho has time for - hence why he sticks to Eto'o so much - he knows what he's good for and all that.

 

If our attack was spearheaded by Lukaku - sooo many of our general problems are addressed from a physicality, pace, overall general play, etc. standpoint. We're about 2 places better as a team with someone like him in our squad.

 

0 chance we'd buy him imo, but would be awesome if Mou threw that one our way; out of the kindness of his cold heart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see them loaning him out for one more season. After the success of Remy, Ashley can see the benefit of paying the fee for a quality loan. Remy is the difference between us being where West Ham and all that crap are. I get the feeling Pards is going to stick with this 4-4-2 hes had success with this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be f***ing ridiculous if Lukaku gets loaned out yet again, sick of Chelsea milking that system so much to their advantage.

 

they have more than 20 players out on loan, it's ridiculous, lukaku may go out on loan next season, courtois has been on loan at atletico for 3 seasons now, Loaning all these players out is 1 clever way of getting around the homegrown rule which lukaku will be classed as of next season despite playing only 10 games at chelsea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be f***ing ridiculous if Lukaku gets loaned out yet again, sick of Chelsea milking that system so much to their advantage.

 

they have more than 20 players out on loan, it's ridiculous, lukaku may go out on loan next season, courtois has been on loan at atletico for 3 seasons now, Loaning all these players out is 1 clever way of getting around the homegrown rule which lukaku will be classed as of next season despite playing only 10 games at chelsea.

 

It's obscene. 27 players on loan, including three to separate Prem clubs and no less than five different Championship clubs have Chelsea players playing for them.

 

Around ten seems to be the norm for mos clubs - Liverpool have 14 and it looks like they might be the next-most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with abolishing the loan system, cos it does have benefits, but they need to change summat to prevent Chelsea doing that like. 27 players out on loan is fucking mad, that's like our entire first team squad and then some ffs. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would outlaw loans to teams in the same league, and I would limit them to one season at each club as well.

 

the worst example recently even though they are not in the premier league is Charlton athletic, sack powell, get a new owner is who belgian, hire the manager from standard liege and get 5 or 6 players from standard liege on loan.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...