Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Really struggles with signings. Saw someone mentioned the striker he signed from the Dutch league that has struggled. I remember he signed Van Wolfswinkel at Norwich too and that was not good either. None of his signings have really stood out at all.

 

Would really benefit from a continental setup where he is just a coach and there is a team that focuses on recruitment. Closest he has had that was with us ironically.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighton do have that exact setup, don’t they? Dan Ashworth left England to join them as Technical Director.

 

Edit: Pascal Gross has been a pretty big success, I’d say. A number have disappointed though, especially most of the ones brought in this summer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, but you have to have ambition to improve, otherwise why exist? Fans of other clubs love to criticise you for trying 'unrealistic' things, who are they to say what you should be aiming for?

 

I'd say, given where he found them and where he took them, that CH deserved next season tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighton do have that exact setup, don’t they? Dan Ashworth left England to join them as Technical Director.

 

Edit: Pascal Gross has been a pretty big success, I’d say. A number have disappointed though, especially most of the ones brought in this summer.

 

Ah, right. Didn't realise. Man, in that case I'd be looking at whoever made those signings.

 

Yeah, Gross has been decent actually, but he cost under £3 million. All their bigger money signings have struggled.

 

Locadia - £15.30 million

Izquierdo - £13.50 million

Propper - £11.70 million

Jahanbakhsh - £17.10 million

Bissouma - £15.21 million

Bernardo - £ 9 million

 

These alone are around £81 million.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s one of those like McCarthy or Bruce who straddle the line between “really good Champo manager” and “not quite good enough in the PL.” I’m sure he’ll land on his feet and some Championship side will be lucky to have him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

3 wins in 23 games is enough to get anyone the sack despite what they had done previously at the club or their reputation.  Better now, than wait after 5 games into next season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are awful so it's deserved. He's spent too much time spouting total bollocks about how Black and ethnic people are discriminated in football as he sits there a millionaire

 

One of the worse posts of all time on N-O.

 

Dave would have smacked that down with no mercy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Brighton were very poor this term and were lucky to stay up. A low points total despite a large slice of good fortune. Plunging form into the bargain.

 

Cardiff were basically robbed against Chelsea six weeks ago, and had they won that game, I think the extra momentum and extra pressure on Brighton would have taken the relegation battle to the wire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think he's done as a Premier manager, but he's got a respectable record. Not really going anywhere though so no surprise Brighton have decided they'd rather move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said previously, I feel the sacking is harsh but I do understand the other side of the argument.

 

Hughton certainly has flaws, and Brighton's recent form has been poor.

 

We'll know at the end of the next season, whether it was the right decision or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said previously, I feel the sacking is harsh but I do understand the other side of the argument.

 

Hughton certainly has flaws, and Brighton's recent form has been poor.

 

We'll know at the end of the next season, whether it was the right decision or not.

 

Well, we’ll know whether the new manager is good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember many years ago attending the leaving do of an employee at the huge company that I worked for.  I was talking to the then new MD and I said how nice it was to see someone who had worked for the company for 30years.  He said 'I don't want my managers working for me for 30 years, 3 years max and by then you've had the best out of them'

I think that applies to football managers, it must be difficult to maintain the momentum over long periods, of course there are exceptions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feel for Hughton. Don't think you can really argue its time though. Sure they could have given him one more but I don't begrudge the change provided they get someone that is a clear step up. He was lucky they didn't go down and he hasn't had a shoestring budget even if its less than many. It's not as harsh as his Newcastle sacking.

 

He will get another gig. Good time for Brighton to try and take a step up. If anything credit for Brighton for sticking with him to season end instead of knee jerk firing him earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£ Net Spends since Summer 2016

 

Man City: 343m

Man Utd: 310m

Chelsea: 203m

Everton: 160m

Arsenal: 148m

BRIGHTON: 130m

Wolves: 124m

West Ham: 112m

Eddie “League 2 Squad” Howe: 104m :shifty:

Fulham: 101m

Palace: 85m

Hudd: 81m

Leic: 76m

LFC: 73m

Burnley: 49m

Watford: 41m

Spurs: 31m

Rafa Benitez: 4m

Southampton: -10m

 

But according to the media Chris Hughton has been doing a miracle with the money they’ve given him :spit:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Hughton is a decent manager who has done a great job at Brighton, but the results speak for themselves. It would have been bad had they sacked him in January or once they were safe, but after the season has ended they have every justification to get rid. He’ll be fine, he’s a good manager, but not at a certain level to take clubs and payers to another level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£ Net Spends since Summer 2016

 

Man City: 343m

Man Utd: 310m

Chelsea: 203m

Everton: 160m

Arsenal: 148m

BRIGHTON: 130m

Wolves: 124m

West Ham: 112m

Eddie “League 2 Squad” Howe: 104m :shifty:

Fulham: 101m

Palace: 85m

Hudd: 81m

Leic: 76m

LFC: 73m

Burnley: 49m

Watford: 41m

Spurs: 31m

Rafa Benitez: 4m

Southampton: -10m

 

But according to the media Chris Hughton has been doing a miracle with the money they’ve given him :spit:

 

 

 

 

 

I think overall wage bill is a better metric regarding where a team should finish and how well a manager is doing. Net spend is hugely defined by how much teams receive from outgoing transfers. LFC have the worlds most expensive GK and CB because they received what? The 3rd biggest transfer fee of all-time for a player that isn't close to being the third world best in the world.

 

I'm confident that Wolves and West Ham have a significantly higher wage bill than Brighton. Spurs, Watford, LFC, Soton and Leicester too.

 

 

Interestingly, Liverpool have the highest second wage bill in the league. Higher than City's

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/8386507/liverpool-man-city-prem-wage-bill/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighton fans seem to think it’s the right decision so as unfortunate as it is for him, it’s the right decision.

 

He’ll be back with another club soon. He’ll make a career at bringing club up and keeping them there for a season or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...