Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest chopey

Sissoko was the coward today this bloke is quality but he's not used to his headless chicken postion today

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sissoko was the coward today this bloke is quality but he's not used to his headless chicken postion today

 

His headless chicken position no way excuses for not running for the ball, wimping out of challenges and not even attempting to pass or take on his man.

 

He was pathetic today and he has been in far too many games this season.

 

A world class player on his day, but in our position we cant wait around for our big players to have "good days" they need to get their heads out of their arses and perform every week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

it's a non argument really a bit like saying which shit smells the most but if I had a choice between the two I would choose gini any day

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Much better in the middle imo, where he can use his quick feet and pace to get out of trouble, get away from a player and take us to the next phase.

 

Came in here to post this. Would love to see more of him at CM in the weeks ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pathetic again. 18 touches in that first half. He is better then Colback and going invisible.

 

Improved in the 2nd half but just not good enough, drop him for away games.

 

Thought he had a marked improvement on his usual away performances. Influenced the midfield a lot more than he normally would?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much better in the middle imo, where he can use his quick feet and pace to get out of trouble, get away from a player and take us to the next phase.

 

Aye, definitely his best away performance in that central position, big improvement on Anita.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pathetic again. 18 touches in that first half. He is better then Colback and going invisible.

 

Improved in the 2nd half but just not good enough, drop him for away games.

 

Thought he had a marked improvement on his usual away performances. Influenced the midfield a lot more than he normally would?

 

Yeah I did too. a lot of pressing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Not doing enough, but that was by far his best away performance for us in that 1. I noticed him on the ball and 2. When I noticed him on the ball he often passed it to one of our players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pathetic again. 18 touches in that first half. He is better then Colback and going invisible.

 

Improved in the 2nd half but just not good enough, drop him for away games.

 

Thought he had a marked improvement on his usual away performances. Influenced the midfield a lot more than he normally would?

 

Certainly not in the first half. he got involved the least out of everyone. He did get involved more in the 2nd half though when moved next to Shelvey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pathetic again. 18 touches in that first half. He is better then Colback and going invisible.

 

Improved in the 2nd half but just not good enough, drop him for away games.

 

Thought he had a marked improvement on his usual away performances. Influenced the midfield a lot more than he normally would?

 

Certainly not in the first half. he got involved the least out of everyone. He did get involved more in the 2nd half though when moved next to Shelvey.

 

For him, it was a massive improvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually think he did well, when dropped deeper.  The game suited him by then, as Leicester had started to sit back, so he managed to get on the ball more in space.  He's probably our best dribbler of the ball and he's pretty quick.  Always seems to turn out of trouble, as well. 

 

He still doesn't get involved away from home, in the supposed no.10 role that he starts in.  He ends up in no man's land, between Mitro and the midfield.

 

I don't know what the answer is.  I still feel we're not utilising him properly.  But at the same time, he goes missing and it has to be down to him, as well. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Nath. Thought he looked better deep, as he has the technical ability and vision to start a counter attack. Up front he needs someone to supply him with the balls and he ends up being anonoymous for most parts. He can still score goals from a deeper role as long as Shelvey sits even deeper. Give Wijnaldum more of a box to box role imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...