Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Noticed he has a good knack of sneaking up on a player from behind and getting a toe on the ball to knock it to a team mate or gain possession. Noticed it a few times v Derby at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The game was so loose and there was so much space by the time he went in centre mid its hard to read anything into how he played there IMO

 

While true if you put Colback in the same situation, i just think he's a far better option than Colback in CM how ever much space there is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know tropes about players can become boring forum mythology, but I really think he's being used completely wrongly. He's a languid midfielder who can put his foot on the ball and have the odd drive forward from central midfield. At #10/second striker he is easily marked out of games, lacks the control for tight spaces and doesn't hold the ball up. His goalscoring threat is also negated, because he's better striking from distance than playing back to goal and sniffing in and around the box.

 

It's pissing me off including Colback in CM and accomodating Diame further forward in a position he's no good at. It's clearly because Colback is seen as a 'safe' holding option to compliment Shelvey. As if it's not possible to get away with two midfielders who's first thought is to play progressively. IMO - this is bollocks, you can completely get away with it at this level. Especially when the alternative offers so little technically, tactically and physically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...