SUPERTOON Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 If Liverpool get him and Mac Allister that’s their midfield issues sorted. They will be right back up challenging next season you would imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Aye. I was thinking about our options and I think if prefer another all rounder such as Thuram or Kone to replace Longstaff, rather than am outright number six like Ugarte. Either would work like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 07:52, The Prophet said: Aye. I was thinking about our options and I think if prefer another all rounder such as Thuram or Kone to replace Longstaff, rather than am outright number six like Ugarte. Either would work like. Expand Not think we go for both? As in an out and out number 6 and then Longstaff replacement/competition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 07:44, The Prophet said: Ugarte to Liverpool getting a bit of traction. Expand Welcome to him as far as I’m concerned. I fully expect him to make me look stupid but I don’t think he’s very good at all. I’d be annoyed if they got Lavia though, think he’d be perfect for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 07:53, SUPERTOON said: Not think we go for both? As in an out and out number 6 and then Longstaff replacement/competition? Expand Aye, I keep forgetting we're in Europe, so we'll likely need more options in there. I can see one being a more marquee name and another being one for the future, like that lad from Bristol City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 07:54, McCormick said: Welcome to him as far as I’m concerned. I fully expect him to make me look stupid but I don’t think he’s very good at all. I’d be annoyed if they got Lavia though, think he’d be perfect for us. Expand Would be surprised if Liverpool were to get Lavia alongside Mac Allister and Ugarte, particularly are they seem set on moving Trent central as well. Not sure we will get Lavia regardless mind, we have yet to be strongly linked (not that the media knows that much). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Gravenberch perhaps. More of an allrounder/box to box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 08:13, SUPERTOON said: Would be surprised if Liverpool were to get Lavia alongside Mac Allister and Ugarte, particularly are they seem set on moving Trent central as well. Not sure we will get Lavia regardless mind, we have yet to be strongly linked (not that the media knows that much). Expand Aye the lack of Lavia links are annoying. He's perfect for us. Decent fee, smallish wages, massive potential. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 08:42, r0cafella said: How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Expand Can't imagine them having any issues. Their net spend is just over £100m for the last three years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 The way Klopp talks about it they have 50p to spend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 08:42, r0cafella said: How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Expand Very healthy (possibly the best in the league). https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/financial-fair-play-rules-mean-25426611?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 09:02, Tiresias said: The way Klopp talks about it they have 50p to spend Expand Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 09:10, Froggy said: Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Expand Oh I get that, and that's what we have been trying to do, before dropping £60m on Isak we were banging on that we had less than that overall for whole window. It's more how much he complains about how poor Liverpool can't compete with the big club while signing loads of players. I completely see the argument, it's obscene what Chelsea, City, and in the future one suspects we can do, but Liverpool have been able to buy top players. You just have to be smart, and generally Liverpool have been, their squad isn't cheaply assembled and despite blip this year have generally been pretty close to Man City. Basically I understand the complaint but Klopp acting like he has assembled his squad from scraps and money found behind sofa always grates a bit for me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) On 11/05/2023 at 09:10, Froggy said: Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Expand Nah the best way is to just say that about his position without, as he does, whining on about others, quite often talking utter shit with little basis in fact. Edited May 11, 2023 by madras Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 09:23, Tiresias said: Oh I get that, and that's what we have been trying to do, before dropping £60m on Isak we were banging on that we had less than that overall for whole window. It's more how much he complains about how poor Liverpool can't compete with the big club while signing loads of players. I completely see the argument, it's obscene what Chelsea, City, and in the future one suspects we can do, but Liverpool have been able to buy top players. You just have to be smart, and generally Liverpool have been, their squad isn't cheaply assembled and despite blip this year have generally been pretty close to Man City. Basically I understand the complaint but Klopp acting like he has assembled his squad from scraps and money found behind sofa always grates a bit for me Expand Aye the squad is very expensive. Top 5 ITW I reckon. More expensive than the "all-star" Real Madrid team they lost too. But the wages are likely much less. They sell fairly well too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 I know the Saudi's are mental but has anyone told them they don't have to waste money so fucking recklessly? Messi and Ronaldo I can get behind because they bring much more to the table but Lloris on 300k a week? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 He'd be absolutely mental to turn down £15 million a year like. There's no way he gets a game in the PL next season and if he goes back to France he'll be lucky to get £30,000 a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lxsln Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 09:56, lxsln said: No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? Expand I’d be all over that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Given his performance at SJP the other week, no. I assume he's a much better player than he showed us though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lxsln Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 11/05/2023 at 09:59, Dr.Spaceman said: Given his performance at SJP the other week, no. I assume he's a much better player than he showed us though? Expand 7 goals and 14 assists in 45-ish PL-games for Tottenham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) On 11/05/2023 at 09:56, lxsln said: No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? Expand Last year's form - undoubtedly. This year's form - no. Ability wise? Yes. Left footer. Great price. Can play RM and I assume AM. He was brilliant last season. Scoring and creating. 35m? Better value than Maddison. From what I know, I would be all owa that. Edited May 11, 2023 by The College Dropout Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Him linking up with Isak is making me.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now