Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Geordie_once_removed said:

So that's about £170 million on Rice and Havertz. Which is the last player Arsenal got serious, above 30 million, money for? Surely they'll be at their FFP limits now. 

 

Rice seems like a good move, but someone needs to explain Havertz to me. He's not a bad player but I just don't seem what he adds to an already very good team, especially as I feel they have a few alternatives who all are good and similar.

Selling academy players like Willock and Iwobi for ~£30m is a massive help to FFP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t get over that Havertz transfer, they reckon it’s 70m with the add ons included too. He has looked awful for ages now and it’s not even a position they really needed.
 

Put 10-15m on top of that and instead for 80/85m they could have had their pick of elite midfielders round Europe 

 

 

Edited by Viewfromtheafternoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Viewfromtheafternoon said:

Can’t get over that Havertz transfer, they reckon it’s 70m with the add ons included too. He has looked awful for ages now and it’s not even a position they really needed.
 

Put 10-15m on top of that and instead for 80/85m they could have had their pick of elite midfielders round Europe 

 

 

 

He was one of the upcoming elite midfielders though. The lad has bags of talent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Viewfromtheafternoon said:

Looked awful and disinterested for the best part of a year now though if not more, I know Chelsea has been a mess but still. Can only see him flopping massively. 

Played as a striker. Isn’t a striker. Easy as that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheInfiniteOdyssey said:

Rice is a brilliant player and justifies the acclaim.


It’s a lot of money but he will likely be a key player for the next 5 years.

 

Xhaka out the door for around £15m and will probably sell Partey for about £30m. 


What is he brilliant at? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mountain said:

Kane is brilliant but Lewandowski wasn't too shabby either. It is a much easier league and Lewa had better players around him so if he stays injury free 41 goals wouldn't be impossible but that's an insane number.

 

image.thumb.png.465f9b6ad13a0f52257b8d72fa200f1b.png

 

 

 

 

image.thumb.png.d16f0bcbce3bfdacffcad55fc5599e3e.png

 

 

 

 

Bayern scored 92 goals in 34 games this season, and I think that is the lowest in the last few years. They normally score nearly 100 goals. The Spurs scored 70 goals in 38 games. I am not trying to downplay Lewa who is a great player. But I think Kane is not that far behind. Sometimes we are guilty of underrating EPL players. Kane's record in the premier league is insane. I think he is as good and there is a slight chance that he could be better than Lewa. I would be sad to see him leave Spurs as he is a genuinely great striker and I love watching such players. However, if he moves to Bayern, I wouldn't bet against him scoring late 30s number of goals per season, atleast. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish everyone else would stop doing class deals (not including Rice to Arsenal, obviously) - I really think the Havertz, Mac Allister and Maddison transfers will be a success, with Chelsea set to fluke someone class like Caicedo and Liverpool going for the same midfielders we want.

 

Throw in West Ham being super rich and Aston Villa's impressive ambition, it's going to such a competitive top-eight next season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, AJ9 said:


What is he brilliant at? 

 

Pretty sure he's top in the league for interceptions and interceptions and ball carries combined. 

 

Think he's known as a DM but he's a lot more than that really. He's one of the few midfielders that have bossed a  game against us when they came up here last season. 

 

It's an expensive fee but with his age and he's pretty much a guaranteed success I think it's a great signing for them. Much better than Caecido would be at £70m.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need explaining why rice is class :lol: Jesus Christ. He’s not overated at all. He’s a world class center mid, incredibly durable, one of the best ball winners, readers of the game, great passer and dribbler and who will probably transform that arsenal midfield this season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Manxst said:

Goals scored in a season? (Lewandowski got 41). It’s not a particularly challenging league imo, so he should have a decent chance if he goes. 

It's 41 in 34 games if he plays every game. Strongly doubt he'll break that

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kanji said:

If you need explaining why rice is class :lol: Jesus Christ. He’s not overated at all. He’s a world class center mid, incredibly durable, one of the best ball winners, readers of the game, great passer and dribbler and who will probably transform that arsenal midfield this season. 

People who don’t rate him don’t know ball

 

Seems the managers of the clubs 1st and 2nd do though unlike this internet fuckwits surprise surprise

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tgarve said:

People who don’t rate him don’t know ball

 

Seems the managers of the clubs 1st and 2nd do though unlike this internet fuckwits surprise surprise


Nee need to get your knickers in a twist and throw insults around like ?.  It’s a huge fee, people are wondering if he’s really that level. I mean we’re now talking better than Bellingham with that fee. 

 

 

Edited by AJ9

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jaqen said:

 

Pretty sure he's top in the league for interceptions and interceptions and ball carries combined. 

 

Think he's known as a DM but he's a lot more than that really. He's one of the few midfielders that have bossed a  game against us when they came up here last season. 

 

It's an expensive fee but with his age and he's pretty much a guaranteed success I think it's a great signing for them. Much better than Caecido would be at £70m.

 


He we also part of a midfield that lost 1-5 to us like, but I take your points on board. Maybe I’ve watched too much of him for England under Southgate tbh and judged him on that, where he’s looked nothing special at all, while we’ve been passed off the park by better technical players when we’ve met better sides. 
 

With West Ham, I would imagine he’s having to do a lot of work intercepting and carrying because of the way they’ve played and generally allowed teams to come onto them, and with also little in the way of effective attacking systems. He’s looked pretty Roy of the Rovers because that’s what he’s been basically tasked with - carrying a team on his back. Now of course you can take that and say, well if he does that at West Ham, he will be world class at Arsenal, because that’ll be him doing that in a better side. Fine, yep, I take that logic. I also don’t think I know more than Pep or Arteta. I’m just intrigued to see whether Rice will be brilliant in a side where there is less demand on the things we all know he is good at, and instead asked to be a world class deep playmaker in a team that dominates possession. Obviously we will find out soon.

 

To be clear, I’m not calling him as shite, he’s very good at what he does, I just don’t know whether I see a £105 mill / world class midfielder. I’m aware his stats are league leading in some aspects as well.

 

Maybe I’m just a fuckwit though…

 

 

Edited by AJ9

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, AJ9 said:


Nee news to get your knickers in a twist and throw insults around like ?.  It’s a huge fee, people are wondering if he’s really that level. I mean we’re now talking better than Bellingham with that fee. 

 

Tbf, Rice has been bossing midfields in the Premier League for the last few years, Bellingham has played in the Championship and Bundesliga. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, I’ll step out of this now! Who knew Declan Rice could inspire such thought and debate at 6am? Questioning my life here ?

 

 

Edited by AJ9

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he starts scoring or creating he'd be worth it like, but atm he's a box to box player who is really limited in the final 3rd. And although he's a good passer across the pitch, he's not very creative from deep either.

 

He's a Kante type midfielder really, exceptional at winning possession and driving up the pitch, or knocking it someone in a better position.

 

The reason Tonali excites me (and I would never dream of saying he's better than Rice at this stage :lol:) is that to go along with all of that, he looks to be able to ping the ball over the top well from deep as well as cause damage around the box.

 

For over £100m you can surely find a player who is defensively sound, great ball carrier, but far better technically.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, AJ9 said:


Nee need to get your knickers in a twist and throw insults around like ?.  It’s a huge fee, people are wondering if he’s really that level. I mean we’re now talking better than Bellingham with that fee. 

 

 

 


And Camavinga and Tchoumani too, if we’re using the fee metric. It’s absolute madness, the fee. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, triggs said:

It's 41 in 34 games if he plays every game. Strongly doubt he'll break that

Lewandowski got 41 in 29. It’s a poor league and Kane’s a great finisher- every bit as good as the (then) 33 year old Lewandowski

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...