Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

Those fuckers (Liverpool) have been inflating the market for years. First a world record for defender, and then a world record for keeper was it not? Yeah Chelsea are somewhat despicable, but Liverpool and it's fans have been for some 40 years. And they now have the most awful manager by some margin.

 

 

Edited by Turnbull2000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the ideal scenario is for Liverpool to miss out on all targets AND for Chelsea to later be found guilty of FFP breaches. Not that it ever seems to mean anything if someone is guilty.

 

Liverpool and Klopp are surprisingly to me becoming our new closest rivals with all of their whining and complaining. Thought it would be Spurs when we got took over but feels like we have already moved past them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Disco said:

Todd Baldy swapping Mendy and Kepa out for less than what they paid for Brighton’s reserve keeper is superb work.

 

I don't really understand what they're doing, why have they just given Kepa to Real Madrid on loan

 

And I saw they were linked with Schmeichel to compete with Sanchez. Dire stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Liverpool are proper clean shirt grassers but they're not wrong like, there's no way Chelsea are doing this above board. I don't care whether they're on long-term contracts, they've spent close to a billion ffs :lol:

Probably not but it unfortunately the ffp is done in reporting periods so a breach won’t be handed out until the end of said period. 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joeyt said:

 

I don't really understand what they're doing, why have they just given Kepa to Real Madrid on loan

 

And I saw they were linked with Schmeichel to compete with Sanchez. Dire stuff

 

 

Keep would have been on crazy wages, one of crazy Todds big ideas is to get the majority of the squad on lesser wages (as many under 100k as possible) but over what seems like 50 year deals. His grand plan was to buy younger talents on larger fees but pay smaller wages, so Mudryk cost plenty but his wage is supposedly modest in comparison and under 100k.

 

Also, Sanchez isn't very good and not an elite keeper or at the level Chelsea want to be at. Very odd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Chelsea must be offering massive wages if Caicedo, Lavia and Olise are choosing them over City and Liverpool. 

Which is odd because the athletics  in particular kept mentioning how the wages were crazy in January. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...