Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Greg

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, St1pe said:

It seems like a really bad move for Lavia given the options Chelsea have. He would have got more game time at Liverpool surely?

Very high risk of being burglarised on Merseyside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mighty__mag said:

Can someone bring me up to speed with how Chelsea can keep doing this? I appreciate they made a few quid with sales, but they're pushing to the limit.

 

I don't think anyone can definitively, hence why Liverpool have asked the Premier League to double check it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, St1pe said:

It seems like a really bad move for Lavia given the options Chelsea have. He would have got more game time at Liverpool surely?

 

He'd have played every week at Liverpool, who knows at Chelsea, they're a basket case, couldn't even guess what they're trying to do anymore. I'm not even convinced a lot of these players care about playing every week that much anymore, one big contract at a club like Chelsea and they're set for life. You'd think playing and developing would matter to them but it seems not, or else why go there except for money and the London life?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mighty__mag said:

Can someone bring me up to speed with how Chelsea can keep doing this? I appreciate they made a few quid with sales, but they're pushing to the limit.


it’s something like they have an annual amortisation of around £200m since last summer (a little under but near enough) and they’ve brought in a load of profit from sales this summer that for this year balances it out.

 

they’ll need to do similar next summer and the one after that if they want to keep up the big spends.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jdckelly said:

how the hell did liverpool go from one of the better teams at transfers to whatever the hell they're doing now


Was just thinking this. That they were in for Caicedo at all, let alone at that price, feels very much out of character. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, St1pe said:

It seems like a really bad move for Lavia given the options Chelsea have. He would have got more game time at Liverpool surely?

They don't really have options in midfield tbf. At the moment they have Enzo, Caicedo, Gallagher.

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Starting July 1 so Caicedo can only be amortized for five years but everything they have done prior to July 1 gets 8 (or however long the contract is for).

 

The Athletic

Apparently not…

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12406001/Premier-League-CLOSE-Financial-Fair-Play-loophole-Chelsea-accounting-rules-UEFA.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailsport

 

No wonder they are going big this year with no European football to restrict them.

 

 

Edited by LFEE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...