r0cafella Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 19 minutes ago, r0cafella said: How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Can't imagine them having any issues. Their net spend is just over £100m for the last three years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 The way Klopp talks about it they have 50p to spend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 24 minutes ago, r0cafella said: How are Liverpool looking FFP wise? Very healthy (possibly the best in the league). https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/financial-fair-play-rules-mean-25426611?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 5 minutes ago, Tiresias said: The way Klopp talks about it they have 50p to spend Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 8 minutes ago, Froggy said: Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Oh I get that, and that's what we have been trying to do, before dropping £60m on Isak we were banging on that we had less than that overall for whole window. It's more how much he complains about how poor Liverpool can't compete with the big club while signing loads of players. I completely see the argument, it's obscene what Chelsea, City, and in the future one suspects we can do, but Liverpool have been able to buy top players. You just have to be smart, and generally Liverpool have been, their squad isn't cheaply assembled and despite blip this year have generally been pretty close to Man City. Basically I understand the complaint but Klopp acting like he has assembled his squad from scraps and money found behind sofa always grates a bit for me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Froggy said: Best way to go out about it in my opinion. Woodward used to say we wouldn't be beaten in the market by anyone and we always had money to spend. Usually ended up in us massively overpaying. Nah the best way is to just say that about his position without, as he does, whining on about others, quite often talking utter shit with little basis in fact. Edited May 11, 2023 by madras Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 minutes ago, Tiresias said: Oh I get that, and that's what we have been trying to do, before dropping £60m on Isak we were banging on that we had less than that overall for whole window. It's more how much he complains about how poor Liverpool can't compete with the big club while signing loads of players. I completely see the argument, it's obscene what Chelsea, City, and in the future one suspects we can do, but Liverpool have been able to buy top players. You just have to be smart, and generally Liverpool have been, their squad isn't cheaply assembled and despite blip this year have generally been pretty close to Man City. Basically I understand the complaint but Klopp acting like he has assembled his squad from scraps and money found behind sofa always grates a bit for me Aye the squad is very expensive. Top 5 ITW I reckon. More expensive than the "all-star" Real Madrid team they lost too. But the wages are likely much less. They sell fairly well too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 I know the Saudi's are mental but has anyone told them they don't have to waste money so fucking recklessly? Messi and Ronaldo I can get behind because they bring much more to the table but Lloris on 300k a week? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 He'd be absolutely mental to turn down £15 million a year like. There's no way he gets a game in the PL next season and if he goes back to France he'll be lucky to get £30,000 a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lxsln Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 minutes ago, lxsln said: No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? I’d be all over that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Given his performance at SJP the other week, no. I assume he's a much better player than he showed us though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lxsln Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said: Given his performance at SJP the other week, no. I assume he's a much better player than he showed us though? 7 goals and 14 assists in 45-ish PL-games for Tottenham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) 7 minutes ago, lxsln said: No rumour, but apparently Tottenham do not intend to buy Kulusevski. For €35,000,000, would you go for him? Last year's form - undoubtedly. This year's form - no. Ability wise? Yes. Left footer. Great price. Can play RM and I assume AM. He was brilliant last season. Scoring and creating. 35m? Better value than Maddison. From what I know, I would be all owa that. Edited May 11, 2023 by The College Dropout Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Him linking up with Isak is making me.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 16 minutes ago, Decky said: I know the Saudi's are mental but has anyone told them they don't have to waste money so fucking recklessly? Messi and Ronaldo I can get behind because they bring much more to the table but Lloris on 300k a week? The Chinese tried all this 10 years ago before realising that it's not the players that are the big pull in football, it's the clubs, the competitions and the history behind them. It's extremely difficult to create interest in a football league from scratch and any that succeeded would only do so over a very long time period when such history had been established. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 He'll already know Isak quite well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Kulusevski was brilliant last season. I think it's hard to judge their attacking players too much this season due to how negatively they play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 I’d rather Kulusevski than someone like Barnes personally. Strange though, I thought Spurs had already exercised an obligation to buy clause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 58 minutes ago, TheInfiniteOdyssey said: I’d rather Kulusevski than someone like Barnes personally. Strange though, I thought Spurs had already exercised an obligation to buy clause. They’re only obliged to buy him if they qualify for the CL apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Criminal the way this has been worded Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now