Jump to content

Mike Ashley (former owner)


Disco

?  

464 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Takeover
      21
    • Fakeover
      11


Recommended Posts

 

This article says he’s

 

- Not related to him

- could be related but it’s extremely loose

- is his cousin

- is his half-brother

 

Which is it? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they’re distancing him from the City owners now in case the fit and proper test fails because they are too closely related.

 

Straws. Clutching.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They all know fuck all  :lol:

 

If the group have released a statement, I’m believing that!

More than that club sources confirmed talks and haven't denied anything.

 

I did get s packet of straws out of the cupboard too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be good to have a club that makes the best of itself given the resources it has. Man City levels of investment are unrealistic, but there’s every chance a properly run NUFC could have a go at breaking into the top 6, with the odd cup run too.

 

It would be class for the city to have its club back.🙂

 

This what I want.. Plant the seeds and watch it grow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This article says he’s

 

- Not related to him

- could be related but it’s extremely loose

- is his cousin

- is his half-brother

 

Which is it? :lol:

 

Literally contradicting itself numerous times in that article. Insane.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They all know fuck all  :lol:

 

If the group have released a statement, I’m believing that!

 

A statement that even the club are saying is genuine!

 

This. There wasn't a peep out of anyone but the sun journo, now all of their 'sources' turn up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the local journos haven't got a clue. Chronicle must've pushed about 20 articles today just going off what foreign sources have detailed.

they're all fighting for a story - what they to gain by pretending to buy a club?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That headline on that Craig Hope tweet ffs. :lol: Taken the most negative points about the whole thing; he might only be slightly related by blood to Mansour (which isn't really a negative :lol:), PL paperwork not submitted as of yet and the failed Liverpool attempt means caution should be expressed, and made them as negative as possible. Then the article contradicts everything. State of that fucking rag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That headline on that Craig Hope tweet ffs. :lol: Taken the most negative points about the whole thing; he might only be slightly related by blood to Mansour (which isn't really a negative :lol:), PL paperwork not submitted as of yet and the failed Liverpool attempt means caution should be expressed, and made them as negative as possible. Then the article contradicts everything. State of that fucking rag.

 

All as bad as each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't buy it until I see it on the official site and SD signs get taken down at St. James'.

Be wary of this hope. As has been said many times previously, I wouldn't put it past MA to insist they stay up as part of the deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mail article reads bad as it lols like it has been continually updated by multiple authors without a proofread.

 

It doesn’t however hide the fact that Mail have investigated by speaking to Man City and Liverpool, and this is what they came back with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...