Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

Bit like our friend Harry from down sarf, always find this account interesting. Not beyond the realms people down there are better placed to hear things.

 

https://twitter.com/RyanMaine_/status/1351595483832184836?s=20

 

I agree. People like Ben Jacobs say things but are clearly sided to anti takeover. Accounts like this and that Harry I don't think give a shit what happens. So they are either troll/wum accounts or they are just saying what they've been told.

 

Looking through their twitter accounts, they seem like normal people with their own opinions. It would be very very strange for them to just be saying this just for lols or followers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn’t the arbitration surrounding the separation of PIF from MBS?

If we win that then it wouldn’t matter in anyway.

 

Exactly. The whole point in arbitration is to separate the Saudi state and PIF anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The O&D test doesn't actually preclude someone who has been convicted of murder in a foreign country (or in the opinion of the PL board would have been in this country) from becoming a director. Other than UK convictions with a sentence of a year or more, the test only relates to acts of criminal dishonesty and other specific stuff such as ticket touting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This chap goes into more detail of what the Turks knew about what happened.

 

They say the only time where they weren’t able to listen in to what was happening was when they went into the video conferencing room. Which was a direct line to Riyhad, so did they behead the guy and then show it to MBS?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several years ago i was once called into a meeting to provide some information affecting a change in social security benefits in the upcoming Chancellors budget.  I was advised that only 6 people knew about this and I was warned to not even discuss it with my wife.  Any leak would be easily traced.  Needless to say I kept quiet until after the budget!  The reason I post this is I cannot understand why anyone in the position I was in with confidential information would risk losing their job just to pass this information ergo I conclude that these itk's are just making it up as they go along!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several years ago i was once called into a meeting to provide some information affecting a change in social security benefits in the upcoming Chancellors budget.  I was advised that only 6 people knew about this and I was warned to not even discuss it with my wife.  Any leak would be easily traced.  Needless to say I kept quiet until after the budget!  The reason I post this is I cannot understand why anyone in the position I was in with confidential information would risk losing their job just to pass this information ergo I conclude that these itk's are just making it up as they go along!!!

Aye, I’m not sure I believe any of the ITK’s.

However talking about a legal case is different to talking about government policies/documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...