IMTTS Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 You don’t like her do you? Not one to toot my own horn but I did call the sham nature of PCP a while back: I think (could be wrong) it was just her and PCP If thats the case she should be able to afford us now with the Reubens on board too if she still has PCP backing PCP doesn't actually exist as a business. It's part of the lie that is her public persona. PCP is basically just Staveley. It's not really worth anything in and of itself and owns basically nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 You don’t like her do you? Not one to toot my own horn but I did call the sham nature of PCP a while back: I think (could be wrong) it was just her and PCP If thats the case she should be able to afford us now with the Reubens on board too if she still has PCP backing PCP doesn't actually exist as a business. It's part of the lie that is her public persona. PCP is basically just Staveley. It's not really worth anything in and of itself and owns basically nothing. Go fuck yourself Luke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 IMTTS/Penn/Edwards right now.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 IMTTS/Penn/Edwards right now.... Hope the prick chokes on Bruce's kebab riddled spunk tbph. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PCP-v-Barclays-Summary.pdf Interesting that the judge largely confirms the truth of Staveley's allegations re the conduct of Barclays, but denies any compensation whatsoever on the grounds that PCP is basically a non-existent enterprise that had no real-world ability to raise any finance. That’s not true though is it, who brought Mansour to the table for the first Barclays bail out. Did she earn 300 million for fuck all ? https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kjth9h0p0xf/revealed-the-truth-about-barclays-and-the-abu-dhabi-investment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 I did mention a while back I’d heard there was a version of the consortium that didn’t involve her going ahead. We spend too much time worrying about the Saudis and Staveley, it’s the Reubens we should have been keeping an eye on this whole time, if anything is to happen it’ll be them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 That Barclays deal was dodgy as fuck, there's a reason why the Serious Fraud Office was investigating it for years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 That Barclays deal was dodgy as fuck, there's a reason why the Serious Fraud Office was investigating it for years. Chris Lucas was key. Just saying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Someone at Barclays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consortium of one Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 It looks like PCP can appeal and "just" have to prove damages. God knows how long that will take. My feeling right now is that if there are any other interested parties and they haven't bid because of PCP's involvement then they should. If the American wants to set up a network of clubs following the Red Bull model let him do so. If he'd like to partner with Stavely and the Reubens, even better. Something has to be done. Ashley has to be out and this ghost ship we watch needs some life breathed into it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Someone at Barclays. I can say very little about this Let's just say the company I work for ended up with a lot of former Barclay's senior management (until they made a fucking fortune selling us). People talk. Chris Lucas was 100% going down for what went on until he developed health issues and stepped down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Someone at Barclays. I can say very little about this Let's just say the company I work for ended up with a lot of former Barclay's senior management (until they made a fucking fortune selling us). People talk. Chris Lucas was 100% going down for what went on until he developed health issues and stepped down. ‘Kin ell Shady bastards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PCP-v-Barclays-Summary.pdf Interesting that the judge largely confirms the truth of Staveley's allegations re the conduct of Barclays, but denies any compensation whatsoever on the grounds that PCP is basically a non-existent enterprise that had no real-world ability to raise any finance. I haven't posted in this thread since last summer, when I threw in my cards and gave up on the whole shebang. But I've made an exception today to say you, by the way, are an absolute weapons-grade c*nt. You're welcome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Someone at Barclays. I can say very little about this Let's just say the company I work for ended up with a lot of former Barclay's senior management (until they made a fucking fortune selling us). People talk. Chris Lucas was 100% going down for what went on until he developed health issues and stepped down. Public knowledge. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUKKBN1WO2CX Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Who’s Chris Lucas again? Someone linked to the PL? Someone at Barclays. I can say very little about this Let's just say the company I work for ended up with a lot of former Barclay's senior management (until they made a fucking fortune selling us). People talk. Chris Lucas was 100% going down for what went on until he developed health issues and stepped down. Public knowledge. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUKKBN1WO2CX Yep. Which is why I could say the parts I did. I'm saying nothing else on the matter though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 A high-flying city financier now faces paying millions in legal costs after losing her £600million High Court bid against Barclays over the behaviour of the bank's bosses when negotiating investment deals during the 2008 financial crisis. Oops. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Marca reporting today that the Saudis had eyed Mateo Alemany (former managing director of Real Mallorca and Valencia) as Charnley's replacement. He's rumored to become Barça's managing director after March's election, if Laporta wins (which he's likely to). You're probably more clued in than I do about whether Marca is bullshitting or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Not surprised she lost, the bits I saw she was getting a right arse whipping off the QC and seemed totally unsure of herself on her facts. Mind I’m not saying it’s easy by a long-way facing these legal top level experts. Think we can shut down any thoughts of her going alone now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Not surprised she lost, the bits I saw she was getting a right arse whipping off the QC and seemed totally unsure of herself on her facts. Mind I’m not saying it’s easy by a long-way facing these legal top level experts. Think we can shut down any thoughts of her going alone now. Judge said her claims were valid, Barclays lied and what she said was true. They don’t have to pay her on a technicality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Not surprised she lost, the bits I saw she was getting a right arse whipping off the QC and seemed totally unsure of herself on her facts. Mind I’m not saying it’s easy by a long-way facing these legal top level experts. Think we can shut down any thoughts of her going alone now. Judge said her claims were valid, Barclays lied and what she said was true. They don’t have to pay her on a technicality. She lost so her case wasn’t sound and she still has to pay the massive costs also. I didn’t say Barclays were anything less than dodgy either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 She's treating this as a 'reputational clean slate' if it matters much - but I fear one look at the outcome "rejected" and that's out the window already! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PCP-v-Barclays-Summary.pdf Interesting that the judge largely confirms the truth of Staveley's allegations re the conduct of Barclays, but denies any compensation whatsoever on the grounds that PCP is basically a non-existent enterprise that had no real-world ability to raise any finance. Given you are well respected and highly connected sports journalist attached to major UK paper, can you please find out the sources or comps the judge used in #19, #20, #21 to come up with the probability %'s? I read that entire document and I'm not sure how you come up with the second part of your sentence without being incredibly lacking in ability to understand debt financing and legal judgements. Perhaps stick to what you know best? Perhaps try not to be such a misogynist? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts