Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Awaymag said:

so OD&T are meant to be applied every year!   So therefore the Owners of those 6 clubs should now fail the tests............I wont hold my breathe!

On what basis though?

 

I doubt the test has any text relating to something that this could be applied to. Basically the test is not fit for purpose

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't football awful at the moment? 

We've spent far more time in the past year talking about corruption, greed, and court cases than we have anything on the pitch.

 

The actual game (on the field) almost feels incidental these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wallsendmag said:

Isn't football awful at the moment? 

We've spent far more time in the past year talking about corruption, greed, and court cases than we have anything on the pitch.

 

The actual game (on the field) almost feels incidental these days.

It's been the same forever....there's always some corruption story lurking in the background.

George Graham taking bungs

Serie A Scandal

Players influencing games for betting (LeTissier corner debacle)

FiFa world cup voting

Big Sam's alleged dodgy dealings

Jean-Alain Boumsong

Qatar getting a world cup awarded without being able to hold one

Fergie-time

98 World Cup final wrt forcing the real Ronaldo to play hours after having a fit

Chelsea

Man City

Glazers

 

 

And thats just off the top of my head without research

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, gjohnson said:

It's been the same forever....there's always some corruption story lurking in the background.

George Graham taking bungs

Serie A Scandal

Players influencing games for betting (LeTissier corner debacle)

FiFa world cup voting

Big Sam's alleged dodgy dealings

Jean-Alain Boumsong

Qatar getting a world cup awarded without being able to hold one

Fergie-time

98 World Cup final wrt forcing the real Ronaldo to play hours after having a fit

Chelsea

Man City

Glazers

 

 

And thats just off the top of my head without research

No mention of Platini? Or the Panama Papers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gjohnson said:

It's been the same forever....there's always some corruption story lurking in the background.

George Graham taking bungs

Serie A Scandal

Players influencing games for betting (LeTissier corner debacle)

FiFa world cup voting

Big Sam's alleged dodgy dealings

Jean-Alain Boumsong

Qatar getting a world cup awarded without being able to hold one

Fergie-time

98 World Cup final wrt forcing the real Ronaldo to play hours after having a fit

Chelsea

Man City

Glazers

 

 

And thats just off the top of my head without research

Harry Redkanpp and his amazing number counting dog?

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, gjohnson said:

It's been the same forever....there's always some corruption story lurking in the background.

George Graham taking bungs

Serie A Scandal

Players influencing games for betting (LeTissier corner debacle)

FiFa world cup voting

Big Sam's alleged dodgy dealings

Jean-Alain Boumsong

Qatar getting a world cup awarded without being able to hold one

Fergie-time

98 World Cup final wrt forcing the real Ronaldo to play hours after having a fit

Chelsea

Man City

Glazers

 

 

And thats just off the top of my head without research

Aye but even then most of the talk was still, on the field actual football related. Nowadays we seem to be taking more about off the field events, probably nowhere more than at Newcastle tbh.

 

Certainly I'd say the 3 most talked about topics on here are the 2 takeover ones and the Mike Ashley thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, the test is not fit for purpose. The lack of transparency or constant application is flat out negligent. The league has long become a victim of catering to the top end clubs and tv partners. The test should be about business plan, liquidity, and recourse if something happens under their ownership that they can’t cure via money/fine or penalty via increased regulation on how they conduct business. They should not be attempting to play politics like they have done with us. They should not allow owners to break away and form their own super league or owners to bleed a club dry. They should not allow their owners to encumber a club with highly levered and expensive debt. That’s the role of the league. They need to punish the 6 with the kitchen sink. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact can’t be lost on Masters that he’s tried to do the big 6 a favour by wrecking our takeover and they’ve absolutely pissed on his cornflakes in return. 

If it was me I’d have waved the deal through as soon as the super league shite came out.

Can’t help think this will have played into our hands. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RS said:

The fact can’t be lost on Masters that he’s tried to do the big 6 a favour by wrecking our takeover and they’ve absolutely pissed on his cornflakes in return. 

If it was me I’d have waved the deal through as soon as the super league shite came out.

Can’t help think this will have played into our hands. 
 

Me too, surely this can’t be stopped now ? 
 

That said no doubt we’d have been right on the gravy train .

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RS said:

If it was me I’d have waved the deal through as soon as the super league shite came out.

I would have loved that but its an emotional, petty response that could bite them in the arse at a later date.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wandy said:

This shambles has strengthed our case in any legal battle, there cannot be any doubt about that.

It has, in fact that it fell apart probably had more to do with the “big 6” lobbying other clubs to kick off about it as it did about BeIn or Qatar. There’s not a chance those clubs will be in a position to approach anyone in the near future.

It would be a great time to push this through as there’s so much other more newsworthy stuff happening that all the negative press that would normally come our way could only be a fraction this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr Jinx said:

It has, in fact that it fell apart probably had more to do with the “big 6” lobbying other clubs to kick off about it as it did about BeIn or Qatar. There’s not a chance those clubs will be in a position to approach anyone in the near future.

It would be a great time to push this through as there’s so much other more newsworthy stuff happening that all the negative press that would normally come our way could only be a fraction this time.

Agree. And to be honest, the government could legitimately get involved in this now...in full glow of the media...and force it through, playing on the clear evidence that the game is bent, controlled by a cartel and in need of serious reform. And there would be nothing any of the shysters in the media could say against it.

The evidence is irrefutable. We said last summer there was a cabal of owners controlling the game and the evidence is now out there for everyone to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

If the hitch is still separation between PIF/the state then I don't see how the events of the last 72 hours has any sway on the takeover at all, tbh. 

It was rumered they were concerned about how much influence MBS would have yeah?

How much influence does Agnelli or Perez have? Enough to very nearly fracture domestic football in several countries?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

If the hitch is still separation between PIF/the state then I don't see how the events of the last 72 hours has any sway on the takeover at all, tbh. 

The ODT is in tatters now. It is literally a joke. Nothing in it should be taken remotely seriously. Unless of course the six clubs get the punishment that the rules state they should.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

If the hitch is still separation between PIF/the state then I don't see how the events of the last 72 hours has any sway on the takeover at all, tbh. 

If the 6 can break the ODT rule B.17.c and not be kicked out of the league in the annual ODT review(yeah right). Then the PIF should just buy us regardless of the ODT, as it has no consequence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credence has been given to Stavely's claims that the big 6 had undo influence on the takeover.  It's now clear to everyone that the Big 6 want to limit their competition.  ODT tests need review and there has to be a watchdog to guard against any influence that goes against "one team, one vote"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yorkie said:

If the hitch is still separation between PIF/the state then I don't see how the events of the last 72 hours has any sway on the takeover at all, tbh. 

Worst case scenario - nothing

Best case scenario- perspective 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yorkie said:

If the hitch is still separation between PIF/the state then I don't see how the events of the last 72 hours has any sway on the takeover at all, tbh. 

There's only a hitch because they wanted one and they wanted one partly because the big 6 don't want the competition and partly because of the beIN piracy issue.

In the other similar case of being faced with a legal loophole obscuring the real owner of Crystal Palace they've just said 'fair enough', when they could and should by their rules have disqualified the directors for failing to provide that information.

Although issues still remain to be fully resolved beIN have clearly mellowed in their stance because we're not getting the negativity from people connected to them that we were before, so if the big 6's influence has been affected by this it could potentially pave the way to the PL saying 'fair enough' and settling our case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

There's only a hitch because they wanted one and they wanted one partly because the big 6 don't want the competition and partly because of the beIN piracy issue.

In the other similar case of being faced with a legal loophole obscuring the real owner of Crystal Palace they've just said 'fair enough', when they could and should by their rules have disqualified the directors for failing to provide that information.

Although issues still remain to be fully resolved beIN have clearly mellowed in their stance because we're not getting the negativity from people connected to them that we were before, so if the big 6's influence has been affected by this it could potentially pave the way to the PL saying 'fair enough' and settling our case.

There is logic in this, but the whole takeover saga has made no sense whatsoever so I’m still thinking even with this ESL fiasco occurring that it won’t change anything 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...