Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Rich

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, SiLvOR said:

McTominay would be sort of signing you'd pick up for free and be quite happy with. However for me, anything close to 20Mil is too much, we can put it to much better use elsewhere.

Unless Eddie actually wants him. If so? Fuck it I’m all in! 
 

:howe:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Skeletor said:

 

57Lc.gif

 

I love Eddie, but some of his taste in players absolutely stinks.

 

Without wading into the Chris Wood debate again, he was pretty solid before Ashworth came in and implemented the transfer panel. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Without wading into the Chris Wood debate again, he was pretty solid before Ashworth came in and implemented the transfer panel. 

Let's be completely honest. I have no doubt Howe will work very closely with Gordon to improve him and I sincerely hope he turns into an excellent player for us. So far, and I mean just so far, that was £40m spent that added nothing to the team from Jan to June. He has the feeling of a Howe signing.

I will reiterate, hope he comes good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lotus said:

Let's be completely honest. I have no doubt Howe will work very closely with Gordon to improve him and I sincerely hope he turns into an excellent player for us. So far, and I mean just so far, that was £40m spent that added nothing to the team from Jan to June. He has the feeling of a Howe signing.

I will reiterate, hope he comes good. 

 

By all accounts Ashworth is a big fan too. We wanted to sign him this summer, but there was an opportunity to bring the deal forward. 

 

What defines a Howe signing though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't such a thing as a 'Howe' signing at the moment, iirc. They've talked about the traffic light system; to progress a player, Ashworth, Howe and Nickson all have to give green lights for it to happen. That doesn't mean that Howe can't obviously campaign for a player and change minds though.

 

 

Edited by Gallowgate Toon

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Without wading into the Chris Wood debate again, he was pretty solid before Ashworth came in and implemented the transfer panel. 

Think the whole Chris Wood deal worked out pretty good in the end! :troll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

 

By all accounts Ashworth is a big fan too. We wanted to sign him this summer, but there was an opportunity to bring the deal forward. 

 

What defines a Howe signing though?

Fair question. I'm just going off rumours and internet chatter. Seems Howe is a big fan of Perm experience. 

 

Have personally questioned that given that Botman, Bruno and Isak are probably our best glitzy signings and they've all come from abroad.

 

Still, that's what the faces say so just going off that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

By all accounts Ashworth is a big fan too. We wanted to sign him this summer, but there was an opportunity to bring the deal forward. 

 

What defines a Howe signing though?

In Gordon’s intro video where they show him meeting everyone, Ashworth greeted him with something along the lines of, ‘I’ve been a big fan of you for a long time’.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When Gordon first broke into the Everton team, he looked very good. It's not unknown for a young player to suffer a dip after making a strong initial impact - eg young Longstaff. Hopefully, they then come back from that apparent setback. 

 

It may be something to do with opponents sussing them out a bit, at which point the player then has to add a bit more nous and versatility to their game. Or maybe it's psychological, they think they've really made it when they get in the first team, then they get brought down to earth with a bump. They then have to reinvent themselves a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SteV said:

In Gordon’s intro video where they show him meeting everyone, Ashworth greeted him with something along the lines of, ‘I’ve been a big fan of you for a long time’.

 

I think Ashworth said something like "I haven't seen you for a long time."

 

Eddie said "I've been a huge admirer of you for a long long time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SUPERTOON said:

Why ? 

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, STM said:

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.


I’m not really convinced we’re planning to play like that. Could equally just been planning to keep playing with 3 all-rounders. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to stay well clear of McTominay. I watch a lot of United games.

 

You have plenty of athletic midfielders who can get around the pitch and impose themselves physically. Your midfield isn't lacking height with Joelinton, Willock and Bruno Guimarães.

 

McTominay is good at making third man runs from midfield to get on the end of moves. Decent goalscorer. But he's very limited technically and not a natural DM.

 

You'd only be helping Unite finance a better CM signing. Newcastle need to be more ambitious than that. Signings like Botman and Isak, not feckin' McSauce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Prophet said:

McTominay and Tierney are the links that won't go away.

 

Add Maddison to that. Rumours that at least two of them in Tierney and Maddison are already agreed, at least if you give any credence on what gets posted here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, STM said:

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.

I’d be very surprised if we sign 3 midfielders tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

:ben:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shayve79 said:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

 

Is it not just a way of differentiating Manchester United and Manchester City?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's me being needlessly picky but there are three Sheffield clubs (four if Hallam is included) - Sheffield, Wednesday and United. 

 

Obviously it matters little in this particular debate but Sheffield are arguably one of the most important teams in the history of organised association football so the "United" situation isn't really for them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...