Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, SteV said:

In Gordon’s intro video where they show him meeting everyone, Ashworth greeted him with something along the lines of, ‘I’ve been a big fan of you for a long time’.

 

I think Ashworth said something like "I haven't seen you for a long time."

 

Eddie said "I've been a huge admirer of you for a long long time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SUPERTOON said:

Why ? 

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, STM said:

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.


I’m not really convinced we’re planning to play like that. Could equally just been planning to keep playing with 3 all-rounders. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to stay well clear of McTominay. I watch a lot of United games.

 

You have plenty of athletic midfielders who can get around the pitch and impose themselves physically. Your midfield isn't lacking height with Joelinton, Willock and Bruno Guimarães.

 

McTominay is good at making third man runs from midfield to get on the end of moves. Decent goalscorer. But he's very limited technically and not a natural DM.

 

You'd only be helping Unite finance a better CM signing. Newcastle need to be more ambitious than that. Signings like Botman and Isak, not feckin' McSauce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Prophet said:

McTominay and Tierney are the links that won't go away.

 

Add Maddison to that. Rumours that at least two of them in Tierney and Maddison are already agreed, at least if you give any credence on what gets posted here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, STM said:

 

Because we need an AM and DM, McTominay is neither, therefore that's potentially 3 midfielders, plus other positions.

I’d be very surprised if we sign 3 midfielders tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

:ben:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shayve79 said:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

 

Is it not just a way of differentiating Manchester United and Manchester City?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's me being needlessly picky but there are three Sheffield clubs (four if Hallam is included) - Sheffield, Wednesday and United. 

 

Obviously it matters little in this particular debate but Sheffield are arguably one of the most important teams in the history of organised association football so the "United" situation isn't really for them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SteV said:

Obviously that’s just ridiculous. But the idea that Eze and Gravenberch are in a ‘Galaticos’ list with Neymar and Kane has tickled me.

 

Yeah, anyone could put that list together just by looking at gossip columns. 

 

Eze I really like, and I think he can play in any of the wider positions in a 4-3-3, in attack or midfield. 

 

It'll be an interesting window, because the only position where I'd say we were actually weak is left back. For the other areas, a replacement would need to be at or near the top bracket. So I think we'll make just 2 or 3 Isak-type signings, and maybe fill out the squad with 1 or 2 promising youngsters or old pros who can do a job, in the event of injuries or fixture congestion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shayve79 said:

 

McTominay is good at making third man runs from midfield to get on the end of moves. Decent goalscorer. But he's very limited technically and not a natural DM.

 

Sounds perfect for us tbh [emoji38]

 

Longstaff should have hit double figures last season.

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Shayve79 said:

I think you need to stay well clear of McTominay. I watch a lot of United games.

 

You have plenty of athletic midfielders who can get around the pitch and impose themselves physically. Your midfield isn't lacking height with Joelinton, Willock and Bruno Guimarães.

 

McTominay is good at making third man runs from midfield to get on the end of moves. Decent goalscorer. But he's very limited technically and not a natural DM.

 

You'd only be helping Unite finance a better CM signing. Newcastle need to be more ambitious than that. Signings like Botman and Isak, not feckin' McSauce.

He’s got 2 goals in over 50 games, he isn’t a decent goal scorer 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

He’s got 2 goals in over 50 games, he isn’t a decent goal scorer 

 

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

He scored like 1 in 10 for Man united :lol:

 

Because they rarely play him as a box to box midfielder.

 

He's usually hiding behind an opposition player, scared shitless over the idea of receiving a pass. He's not a DM. Solskjaer persisted with it for years.

 

He scored 4 goals for Scotland during the last international break. They used him differently.

 

He scored 8 goals (1 might have been taken off him) for United during 20/21. He's not a very good overall player, but he does possess good ball striking technique. His height and physical presence are useful in the opposition box. He's similar to Fellaini.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we take all this mctominay talk over to his thread please? I keep coming in here hoping for the usual high profile dream signings speculation. No disrespect to mctominay, but he does have his own thread and I'd hate his stats and style of play being lost in the transfer rumours thread. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Shayve79 said:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

 

20230525_133710.gif.396b36763d6a2ba83d89ea8b1d272393.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Shayve79 said:

 

Until Newcastle become one of the biggest clubs in the world, they're not going to be associated with the word United over Manchester United.

 

Leeds United are known as Leeds. Sheffield are known as Sheffield. West Ham United are West Ham. It is what it is.

 

What bollocks. It's just lazy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Shayve79 said:

 

 

Because they rarely play him as a box to box midfielder.

 

He's usually hiding behind an opposition player, scared shitless over the idea of receiving a pass. He's not a DM. Solskjaer persisted with it for years.

 

He scored 4 goals for Scotland during the last international break. They used him differently.

 

He scored 8 goals (1 might have been taken off him) for United during 20/21. He's not a very good overall player, but he does possess good ball striking technique. His height and physical presence are useful in the opposition box. He's similar to Fellaini.

 

@TheDarkKnight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...