Jump to content

Still still not worthy of a thread


gbandit

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Scotty66 said:

Got a feeling it will be one of the bidders who wanted Chelsea

I don't really see Liverpool having "oil club" owners. The whole idea is surely to buy a club a lot lower on the elite level, and then you can make a huge profit once they become elite. 

At Liverpool can they really make someone a huge profit considering they're already at the top of the elite level? 

It's a big risk when you can buy a club for much much cheaper and muscle your way in. New owners at Liverpool coming in and getting it wrong, crashing out of Europe, Klopp leaving etc. The value could plummet. 

 

Chelsea have less stature than Liverpool, could see them losing value whereas (as much as I hate to say it) an 'establishment' like Liverpool wouldn't take as much of a tumble in worth. We're a big club, but they're massive and have the fanbase, commercial revenue to command a corresponding sale price. I think they go for £5-6bn rather than the £3.6bn mentioned from that Tweet. 

Chelsea looked fucked when RA had to sell up and they still got sold for £2.5bn, Liverpool should be double that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone explain to me why Liverpool fans are so happy and desperate to get these owners out? From what I can see their owners did the following:

 

- Appointed and supported a world class manager.

- Invested heavily in the playing staff.

- Team had massive success winning the CL and PL amongst other trophies.

- Invested heavily in upgrading and expanding the stadium.

- Built a world class training facility. 

 

What more can they do like? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine they’ve got very high standards for owners, they despised the last ones but I’m surprised that they’re not behind these ones considering the successes they’ve had. Realistically I can’t see a way that they’ll be able to ever compete with Man City or us while we both have the current owners in place so they’ll have to continue with their current model even with new owners 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gbandit said:

I imagine they’ve got very high standards for owners, they despised the last ones but I’m surprised that they’re not behind these ones considering the successes they’ve had. Realistically I can’t see a way that they’ll be able to ever compete with Man City or us while we both have the current owners in place so they’ll have to continue with their current model even with new owners 

 

But they are competing with City. They've outperformed them in Europe and domestically they've went toe to toe with them losing leagues by like a point or 2, beating them once. Those fine margins are probably down to the managers really. I genuinely cannot see what Liverpool fans want. Maybe they're just super annoyed at the Super League thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jack j said:

Sure at the start of the season there was a predicted outcome thread for the English leagues

Title winners

Cup winners

Relegations

Top Scorer

Etc etc

 

Cant seem to find it though

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/11/2022 at 18:39, Decky said:

Can someone explain to me why Liverpool fans are so happy and desperate to get these owners out? From what I can see their owners did the following:

 

- Appointed and supported a world class manager.

- Invested heavily in the playing staff.

- Team had massive success winning the CL and PL amongst other trophies.

- Invested heavily in upgrading and expanding the stadium.

- Built a world class training facility. 

 

What more can they do like? 

 

Their net spend is an issue for most of their fans. Can see their point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

It’s the latest a version of FourFourTwo ranking(2022). It has been published yesterday.

1. ⁠Lionel Messi
2. ⁠Diego Maradona
3. ⁠Cristiano Ronaldo
4. ⁠Pele
5. ⁠Zinedine Zidane
6. ⁠Johan Cruyff
7. ⁠George Best
8. ⁠Franz Beckenbauer
9. ⁠Ferenc Puskas
10. ⁠Ronaldo
11. ⁠Gerd Muller
12. ⁠Alfredo Di Stefano
13. ⁠Michel Platini
14. ⁠Zico
15. ⁠Garrincha
16. ⁠Bobby Charlton
17. ⁠Paolo Maldini
18. ⁠Romario
19. ⁠Giuseppe Meazza
20. ⁠Andres Iniesta
21. ⁠Franco Baresi
22. ⁠Marco van Basten
23. ⁠Eusebio
24. ⁠Xavi
25. ⁠Carlos Alberto
26. ⁠Ronaldinho
27. ⁠Ruud Gullit
28. ⁠Manuel Neuer
29. ⁠Socrates
30. ⁠Raymond Kopa
31. ⁠Lev Yashin
32. ⁠Lothar Matthaus
33. ⁠Stanley Matthews
34. ⁠Valentino Mazzola
35. ⁠Matthias Sindelar
36. ⁠Luis Suarez (born 1935)
37. ⁠Francisco Gento
38. ⁠Bobby Moore
39. ⁠Michael Laudrup
40. ⁠Roberto Baggio
41. ⁠Kenny Dalglish
42. ⁠Paolo Rossi
43. ⁠Nandor Hidegkuti
44. ⁠Gunter Netzer
45. ⁠Gianluigi Buffon
46. ⁠Didi
47. ⁠Rivellino
48. ⁠Kevin Keegan
49. ⁠Thierry Henry
50. ⁠Nilton Santos
51. ⁠Jose Manuel Moreno
52. ⁠Oleg Blokhin
53. ⁠Jairzinho
54. ⁠Gaetano Scirea
55. ⁠Dino Zoff
56. ⁠Juan Alberto Schiaffino
57. ⁠Fritz Walter
58. ⁠Daniel Passarella
59. ⁠Gordon Banks
60. ⁠Gianni Rivera
61. ⁠Karl-Heinz Rummenigge
62. ⁠John Charles
63. ⁠Dixie Dean
64. ⁠Gunnar Nordahl
65. ⁠Johan Neeskens
66. ⁠Denis Law
67. ⁠Sandro Mazzola
68. ⁠Dennis Bergkamp
69. ⁠Jimmy Johnstone
70. ⁠Ronald Koeman
71. ⁠Omar Sivori
72. ⁠Teofilo Cubillas
73. ⁠Dani Alves
74. ⁠Eric Cantona
75. ⁠Jose Andrade
76. ⁠Cafu
77. ⁠Frank Rijkaard
78. ⁠Florian Albert
79. ⁠Luka Modric
80. ⁠Just Fontaine
81. ⁠Josef Masopust
82. ⁠Jimmy Greaves
83. ⁠Hugo Sanchez
84. ⁠Wayne Rooney
85. ⁠Philipp Lahm
86. ⁠Alan Shearer
87. ⁠Allan Simonsen
88. ⁠Sergio Busquets
89. ⁠Hristo Stoichkov
90. ⁠Roberto Carlos
91. ⁠Giacinto Facchetti
92. ⁠Peter Schmeichel
93. ⁠Sandor Kocsis
94. ⁠Luis Figo
95. ⁠Djalma Santos
96. ⁠Javier Zanetti
97. ⁠George Weah
98. ⁠Kaka
99. ⁠Mario Kempes
100. ⁠Gheorghe Hagi

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/ranked-the-100-best-football-players-of-all-time/10

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing immediately stands out as shocking or out of place. I think Dani Alves is the best RB I've ever seen, so I'd maybe have him a bit higher. The older I get the more overrated I think Zidane is as well, he wouldn't be in my top 5 like, definitely not, and not above Cruyff who did much more than just play outstanding football, but was a master tactician and incredibly smart even just in his time as a player. 

 

I get that it's the popular football hipster argument to make, but I think it's a totally correct one tbh - Iniesta was better than Zidane. Stylistically and personal preference, take your pick, but I think in terms of who was better, it's Iniesta. 

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...