Jump to content

Newcastle United vs. Manchester United: 02/04/23 @ 4.30pm (Sky Sports)


HaydnNUFC

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 54 said:

I like how you've conviently not included Murphy and Longstaff who are nailed on to start, there is also a pretty decent chance that Anderson starts too dependent on the injury status of ASM :lol:

 

Which would mean:

 

Pope - £10m

Trippier - £12m

Schar - £3m

Botman - £32m

Burn - £13m

Guimaraes - £40m

Longstaff - £0

Willock - £25m

Anderson - £0m

Murphy - £11m

Isak - £63m

 

Total: £211m

 

He also started Rashford leaving 70 odd million Sancho on the bench which is hilarious given the entire conversation is borne out of his original post claiming Rashford is injured :laugh2:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

De Gea - £18m

Dalot - £19m

Varane - £40m

Martinez - £48m

Shaw - £30m

McTominay - free

Fred - £47m

Bruno - £48m

Rashford - free

Antony - £82m

Weghorst - loan

 

Total: £332m

 

Pope - £10m

Trippier - £12m

Schar - £3m

Botman - £32m

Burn - £13m

Guimaraes - £40m

Joelinton - £40m

Willock - £25m

ASM - £16m

Gordon - £45m

Isak - £63m

 

Total: £299m.

 

Not a single academy player in your starting 11. Buying top four tbh. :ninja:

 

 

Snapchat-543454109.thumb.jpg.638e879fd1a987ecc52d92579f272ac4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gjohnson said:

Irish are the worst for it

Had an Irish flatmate in Glasgow that supported Man Utd and Celtic. From a different planet in terms of his views on being a football supporter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 54 said:

I like how you've conviently not included Murphy and Longstaff who are nailed on to start, there is also a pretty decent chance that Anderson starts too dependent on the injury status of ASM :lol:

 

Which would mean:

 

Pope - £10m

Trippier - £12m

Schar - £3m

Botman - £32m

Burn - £13m

Guimaraes - £40m

Longstaff - £0

Willock - £25m

Anderson - £0m

Murphy - £11m

Isak - £63m

 

Total: £211m

 

Also Isak cost us just over £50m. Doubt we’ll ever play £63m for him. Bruno nearer £35m too. Semantics I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparing the cost of each team's starting XI by getting the Newcastle XI wrong, excluding the subs, the wages, the money spent in the last 14 years, inflation, and still being about £30m out. :lol: Dick Dastardly had better plans.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 54 said:

I like how you've conviently not included Murphy and Longstaff who are nailed on to start, there is also a pretty decent chance that Anderson starts too dependent on the injury status of ASM :lol:

 

You're better than this 54. :lol: Was your Traitors performance a fluke?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

You're better than this 54. :lol: Was your Traitors performance a fluke?

Oh for sure, I knew you where looking for a rise from your post, it was clear as day, just sometimes biting can be both sexy and fun :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 54 said:

Oh for sure, I knew you where looking for a rise from your post, it was clear as day, just sometimes biting can be both sexy and fun :lol: 

 

Was going to stick Garnacho in for Antony too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/03/2023 at 22:33, huss9 said:

no one compares to sunderland for me.

then its liverpool for all sorts of reasons.

chelsea for their racist shennanigans over the years.

 

Chelsea are one of the best supported teams in Africa.

 

So evidently not everyone is bothered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

I'm actually worried for your game rather than excited. :lol:

 

There's a role in it that I keep reading back my explanation of and bursting myself laughing :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...