Jump to content

Champions League 2023/2024: Group F (Newcastle, Milan, Dortmund, PSG)


Marko NUFC

Recommended Posts

So many potential rematches in that lot.

 

Don't want Barcelona, we've done that in the last two. 

 

Benfica was a nice tie, would be good to play them as a competitive team this time.

 

Feyenoord obvious reasons, the CL night there and also beat them on the way to the Fairs Cup.

 

Inter, the last CL route but also my dad said there was a tasty game against them in the Fairs Cup where they tried kicking shit out of us. We won.

 

Dynamo Zagreb, beat them in their Croatia Zagreb incarnation, Jonathan Pearce 'KETSSSSBAAAAIAAAAA'..

 

Rangers, another one from the Fairs Cup days and ructions with the Rangers fans. 

 

Crvena zvezda, from our one shot at the Cup Winners' Cup.

 

 

For those reasons I'd only fancy Benfica again from this lot and Feyenoord because it would be the best shot at beating one of the top seeds. Other than that I want some fresh meat. 

 

 

Edited by Optimistic Nut

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said:

So many potential rematches in that lot.

 

Don't want Barcelona, we've done that in the last two. 

 

Benfica was a nice tie, would be good to play them as a competitive team this time.

 

Feyenoord obvious reasons, the CL night there and also beat them on the way to the Fairs Cup.

 

Inter, the last CL route but also my dad said there was a tasty game against them in the Fairs Cup where they tried kicking shit out of us. We won.

 

Dynamo Zagreb, beat them in their Croatia Zagreb incarnation, Jonathan Pearce 'KETSSSSBAAAAIAAAAA'..

 

Rangers, another one from the Fairs Cup days and ructions with the Rangers fans. 

 

Crvena zvezda, from our one shot at the Cup Winners' Cup.

 

 

For those reasons I'd only fancy Benfica again from this lot and Feyenoord because it would be the best shot at beating one of the top seeds. Other than that I want some fresh meat. 

 

 

 

We had Partizan not Red Star in our CWC tie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joeyt said:

Think Rangers would be one of the most disappointing draws we could get.

 

Albeit could be an easy 6 points

Looking at some of the other teams in qualifying I reckon it’s 50/50 at best as to whether Rangers actually make it to the group stage

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Stifler said:

So we need 6 teams ranked lower than us to have upsets in the qualification round in order to make it into pot 3?

We do, which is all of the qualifiers, so seems very, very unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HaydnNUFC said:

FxPiSifWYAAn_lT.thumb.png.09eafaa002a28515922b9c3121339705.png

 

FxPohnGWwAIizhZ.thumb.png.4ca2b05fb36c0ea2593ebe1743166a5a.png

 

FxO_xolWwAEAMqS.thumb.png.e677c2a6bfab6c6064db4885c0dd78c4.png

 

 

 

Looking at that then we're not going to know the final pots standings until the morning of the 31st August.

 

But can someone explain why - 

 

All of pot 2 have a higher rating than most of pot 1 ?

Why are the manure in pot 2 not 3 as they finished 3rd ?

And if someone says ratings then why aren't all of the highest rated in pot 1, the  pot 2 etc ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

Looking at that then we're not going to know the final pots standings until the morning of the 31st August.

 

But can someone explain why - 

 

All of pot 2 have a higher rating than most of pot 1 ?

Why are the manure in pot 2 not 3 as they finished 3rd ?

And if someone says ratings then why aren't all of the highest rated in pot 1, the  pot 2 etc ?

 

 

Ratings :)

 

But pot one is for Champions regardless of rating.

 

 

Edited by Kazzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

All of pot 2 have a higher rating than most of pot 1 ?

 

Coefficient.

 

2 minutes ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

Why are the manure in pot 2 not 3 as they finished 3rd ?

 

Manure :anguish:, but because of coefficient.

 

2 minutes ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

And if someone says ratings then why aren't all of the highest rated in pot 1, the  pot 2 etc ?

 

Pot 1 is for Champions and the winners of the Europa League.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, South-Cheshire-Toon said:

Looking at that then we're not going to know the final pots standings until the morning of the 31st August.

 

But can someone explain why - 

 

All of pot 2 have a higher rating than most of pot 1 ?

Why are the manure in pot 2 not 3 as they finished 3rd ?

And if someone says ratings then why aren't all of the highest rated in pot 1, the  pot 2 etc ?

 

 

 

Pot one is the Champions of the 7 best ranked leagues + Europa winner.

 

2-4 are ranked on the club's coefficient scores

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the topic of homegrown players been discussed yet? 
 

We need 4 club trained youth products, and from what I can tell we have… Longstaff, Anderson… ?? We can extend Dummetts contract I guess, or just include a bunch of children, but that doesn’t really seem the most ideal route to smashing Real Madrid in the Bernabeu. Am I missing someone?

 

Might be time to spend big $$$ on bringing back… Krul? Forster? There don’t appear to be any outfield players worth retrieving. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...