Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ikon said:


Me not that much either. Just annoyed at all the time that was wasted. Without being able to sort other positions out. 

 

I applaud we made a move, aggressively and likely were close to getting it done. Hindsight is 20/20 but i wish we went this aggressively after JP or Ekitke and paid the # the selling club wanted on 1st or 2nd bid and tried to nail it down faster. But there is no telling or worth wasting time predicting if Chelsea and Liverpool still dont get that last call from the agent to get it done. 

 

No issue with our transfer team here. I still hope the window shuts with us not selling Isak and spending whatever is needed to get an additional striker in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JigsawGoesToPieces said:

76.5 million euros plus 8.5 million euros fee agreed with Man Utd

 

Jim counting the pennies down the back of the sofa as we speak

 

copyImage.gif.55704029cb1b38c7ea1200e52fb8423b.gif

 

Ratcliffe when he wants to sign a new player:

JF_1XCg6G_91eCGEvSUFF1oYbfo=.gif

 

Ratcliffe when he sees Elsie in the staff canteen is still employed:

sdCZ94oYWjbnqZH8m5O9SW9eg7c.gif.cc4e747f7f8863d5c41c57884e7a85bc.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KaKa said:

Really looking forward to seeing how this plays out for him at Man Utd. Will be rooting against both massively this season!

 

If he goes there and ends up going the same way that Hojlund has man ... my God it would be just unreal! :lol:  

 

Then they just sign another for £70m+ next summer. 

 

There is zero consequences for these clubs. 

 

Liverpool - Nunez unbelievable flop really in the context of the fee they paid. Still recouped around £50m for him and still able to sign whoever they want as seen so far. 

Chelsea - huge fee for Mudryk, complete flop so far and now banned for doping. Any other club and that would have been a financial shot in the head but not even a blip to them. Add also to the countless strikers they have signed over the years that flopped. Crikey I mean they signed Lukaku for £90m was it? then just had to loan him out ever year.

Man U - where do you even start, Antony, Sancho, Hojilund. Yet had zero impact on their ability to spend. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Are all the cartel clubs fully spent up now? Can we actually have the next one we go for?

Chelsea have a zero limit zero interest credit card apparently.

 

I want one of those...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well, I guess it's times like these you just have to do the honourable thing and take a step back, hold you hands up and say 'I hope you break every bone in your body twice you fucking scumbag'

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

Most of the expected Isak profit on Sesko was never a good idea imo. I just hope we don't splurge it on Jackson either. 

 

Would rather wait until next summer when Chelsea get bored of Joao Pedro and want to move him on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fenham Mag said:

 

Would rather wait until next summer when Chelsea get bored of Joao Pedro and want to move him on.

 

If you fool me once, shame on you

If you fool me twice, shame on me

If you fool me three times, you must be Joao Pedro

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...