Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would imagine it is due to when MA was here he didn’t make it possible. As in wasn’t interested in holding events or making money from it etc. 

 

would imagine with the new owners they’ll look at making money in many ways. This being one way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it not mostly due to the poor acoustics on account of the lop-sidedness. Think when they've had them previously they've had to set up the stage at an angle in the Strawberry corner, which isn't ideal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pitch.

There is only a small gap where they can rip the pitch up before replanting they seeds etc. Even if they lay down flooring like they usually do for concerts, it can damage the pitch quite a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 26/06/2022 at 20:06, Anderson said:

Is it not mostly due to the poor acoustics on account of the lop-sidedness. Think when they've had them previously they've had to set up the stage at an angle in the Strawberry corner, which isn't ideal.

Expand  

Plus the layout doesn’t lend itself to maxing out capacity with decent views. That said, I went to the San Siro for a concert and they had the stage along what would be our equivalent of the East Stand. Worked well I thought. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

These fucking Freeman of the city and some dozy bye law from days of yor.

Allowing cows to wander around the cheeky twats.

Leazes Park is the only answer.

Then bulldoze St James and landscape the land anyway the council demand 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if 30k trying to secure 1k of tickets changed their plans for the ground at all. Whether it speeds things up, puts it's ahead of other priorities or maybe change the decision of moving. 

 

We'd fill OT next season, going forward with some success the numbers would be off the charts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/06/2022 at 11:28, Nun tumblers said:

These fucking Freeman of the city and some dozy bye law from days of yor.

Allowing cows to wander around the cheeky twats.

Leazes Park is the only answer.

Then bulldoze St James and landscape the land anyway the council demand 

Expand  


The Freeman were fully behind the Leazes Park plan late 90’s. Build it there as originally planned and use remains of current SJP site for green space in the city.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...