Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BeloEmre said:

Paqueta to West ham is off according to SSN.

Hopefully that's true, be gutted if he ended up at West Ham, I think he's the creative spark that we need. He'd be immense with Bruno and maxi link up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

Mehrdad is in London today, interestingly...

As are Paqueta's representatives... 

just posted an IG story about walking the streets after a stressful day in London…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Confident we’ll swoop in last second for Paqueta, hence the JP deal being dead. I mean the rumour is around £50m for Paqueta. £20m more than JP. No brainer. Unless we’re confident of getting Gallagher and Pulisic or something on loan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Away Toon said:

The issue with Paqueta for lots of clubs is his time at Milan. Maybe that’s why we seem to be holding off.


Why would that be a problem? Seems highly unlikely given that we just smashed the record transfer fee for someone who also had a failed passage in a club only a few seasons ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Flip said:


Why would that be a problem? Seems highly unlikely given that we just smashed the record transfer fee for someone who also had a failed passage in a club only a few seasons ago.


cmon NUFC steal the Paqueta deal plz!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flip said:

Confident we’ll swoop in last second for Paqueta, hence the JP deal being dead. I mean the rumour is around £50m for Paqueta. £20m more than JP. No brainer. Unless we’re confident of getting Gallagher and Pulisic or something on loan. 


Why not both Paqueta and Pulisic? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flip said:

Confident we’ll swoop in last second for Paqueta, hence the JP deal being dead. I mean the rumour is around £50m for Paqueta. £20m more than JP. No brainer. Unless we’re confident of getting Gallagher and Pulisic or something on loan. 

I'm not and I'm now starting to wonder why he hasn't already moved. I've watched him a fair bit since Januaryand seems ideal for what we need, so much so that my main fear was that we wouldn't be big enough at this point but it seems like those clubs I was worried about aren't interested........why ? What am I missing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jaqen said:

Think the issue with Paqueta is probably more teams viewing him as a number 10 and not a lot actually needing/using someone in that position. 

 

 

 

Why though ? I don't see it like that, the games more fluid than to pigeonhole someone so narrowly, especially now. He's so versatile he's ideal to have in a modern middle 3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, madras said:

Why though ? I don't see it like that, the games more fluid than to pigeonhole someone so narrowly, especially now. He's so versatile he's ideal to have in a modern middle 3.

 

I think he'd be perfect for our 3 man midfield too. City would make sense if they sold Bernardo. 

 

We bought Bruno unchallenged to be fair so I wouldn't read a whole lot into nobody really being in for him. I just don't think any of the prem teams that can afford Paqueta view that as a priority position at the moment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

West Ham would be such a bad career move for Paqueta, I wonder if this is all being made very public for a reason. It wouldn't suprise me if City come in for him with Bernardo kicking off.

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...