Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Pata said:

Thought he was amazing today, wondering if I'm forgetting some rick due to the neutral ratings in the match thread. Rock solid defensively and really good on the ball as usual. Loved the way he handled Podence (?) when they were countering on full speed and Jimenez did nothing against him.


Aye. Thought he’d be getting more love. MOTM, for me. 
 

Only thing he did wrong was lose it once overplaying on the halfway line. Flawless other than that. 
 

Regularly gets left on an island, with Trippier so far advanced. But he always manages to win the ball and cover. He was playing agains numerous fast and direct attacking players and handled them well. Plus he easily won his battle with Jimenez. 
 

Three and a half million pounds :smitten:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who the fuck does the player ratings at Sky? :lol:

 

Newcastle: Pope (7); Trippier (8), Schar (6), Botman (6), Burn (7); Guimaraes (7), Longstaff (6), Willock (7); Murphy (6), Isak (9), Saint-Maximin (7)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wolves weren’t switched on to cutting the passing lanes when Schär carried it forward, I don’t think many teams defend it well. We can skip the midfield without hoofing it, both Fab and Botman can do it well, I’d still like to see Botman carrying it forward just that little bit more and with a little more regularity. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The College Dropout said:

Sometimes I wish he was more patient in his passing. The floaty ball to nowhere is his speciality. 
 

Otherwise he’s imperious these days. 

 

Yeah, he has a bit of Shelvey in him but think he has dialed it down a bit lately imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Botman is the worse out of the two when tryinh to pass it forward. Sends shivers down me spine when he plays it forward. Schar might float it to nowhere, but he won't play it straight to a nearby opposing player like Botman does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised at any criticism of his passing after yesterday. The data may suggest otherwise but I thought it was a key weapon for us. That one in-particular in the first half where he strode forward then pinged it over to ASM in space without looking was sumptuous. 

 

Thought he was absolutely brilliant yesterday; pipped only by Willock for motm. 

 

I know we were flat for a bit but I honestly thought it was a really good performance all round. Got to be optimistic that we're out of our funk. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yorkie said:

Surprised at any criticism of his passing after yesterday. The data may suggest otherwise but I thought it was a key weapon for us. That one in-particular in the first half where he strode forward then pinged it over to ASM in space without looking was sumptuous. 

 

Thought he was absolutely brilliant yesterday; pipped only by Willock for motm. 

 

I know we were flat for a bit but I honestly thought it was a really good performance all round. Got to be optimistic that we're out of our funk. 

I was curious, as I generally agree with you, and think his passing is a great weapon for us, but looking at his passing stats from this season its actually not the greatest:

 

4238aeb566368e4296cfa4f1a310ac3b.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Prophet said:

Quite a few of Schar's long balls are played into space down the channels to trigger the counter-press. That will effect the data.

If we are playing long balls into the channel with the aim of triggering a counter press no wonder our players are knackered. 
 

I don’t believe we are giving the ball away with the aim to win it higher up the pitch, that’s extremely energy inefficient. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 54 said:

I was curious, as I generally agree with you, and think his passing is a great weapon for us, but looking at his passing stats from this season its actually not the greatest:

 

4238aeb566368e4296cfa4f1a310ac3b.png


Be hugely skewed from taking the punt up field from a FKs from 40 yards back to where Pope takes them I’d have thought. 
 

You’d have to be a nutter to think he’s not a good passer IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...