Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sweet baby Jesus  :lol: never watched the game thank fuck but watching motd, the worst team in the league who haven't

won in 186 days beat us on-

possession 66 -34

Attempts- 17-7

Expected goals-2.12-0.79

:lol: thank fuck i fucked sky off when this clown  🤡 replaced Rafa

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s not getting sacked. At least not until late March when the damage will have been done.

 

The only way we can stay up is if the club sanctions a few transfers, particularly in central midfield.. and of course getting ASM back in the land of the living

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very likely to be Agnew or Clemence initially. Draw a couple games and that'll be that for the rest of this season.

Ameobi probably gets promoted to being Steve #3.

Just need someone to spout s**t to the media as if they're not a club lackey and to pretend to have a job to replace Shola and sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve #2 will become Head Steve, with Steve #3 become Steve #2, and Shola becoming the new Steve #3...

 

If that fails, we can promote Steve #3 who's actually now Steve #2 to become top Steve; with Shola now becoming Steve #2, and bring back Sammy to become Shola.

 

Try that until Shola's in charge with Sammy and Tomi  :frantic:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read Shearer's column in the athletic? Does it criticise Bruce in any way or is it all aimed at Ashley?

 

Just scanned it and mainly a criticism of Ashley/Charnley etc. Does say how bad the football is but gives Bruce all the outs possible. It's all very wishy washy and you can tell how close he is to Bruce and Harper. He calls out the Sheffield game as "crap" but never really says why from our perspective, just that we let them play their game.

 

Makes the point Bruce is head coach only at the beginning and then refers to manager throughout the rest of the article.

 

All very much sympathy for Steve and how there are mitigations. No help from Charnley, everything falls on him etc. Didn't work on me  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read Shearer's column in the athletic? Does it criticise Bruce in any way or is it all aimed at Ashley?

 

Just scanned it and mainly a criticism of Ashley/Charnley etc. Does say how bad the football is but gives Bruce all the outs possible. It's all very wishy washy and you can tell how close he is to Bruce and Harper. He calls out the Sheffield game as "crap" but never really says why from our perspective, just that we let them play their game.

 

Makes the point Bruce is head coach only at the beginning and then refers to manager throughout the rest of the article.

 

All very much sympathy for Steve and how there are mitigations. No help from Charnley, everything falls on him etc. Didn't work on me  :lol:

He makes it very clear he's their pal and doesn't try to hide it, like. I think it's as scathing a criticism of Bruce as we'll get from Shearer, but the main focus of the article is Ashley's/Charnley's absent ownership/chairmanship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be pulis, Hughes or Pearson. There’s no doubt about it.

 

I don't think Pulis would touch it and I have a sneaky feeling Pearson wont touch it as he was here as a coach when it all went tits up in 2009.  This has a Hughes stench all over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...