Jump to content

Positive Optimism - Saudi Takeover Edition


Recommended Posts

  On 02/07/2021 at 04:16, Ben said:

I'm still a bit confused as to why the Premier league wants to peel this orange in its pocket

Expand  

 

Yeah, the only reason a process like this needs to be confidential is that it potentially involves commercially sensitive information for the consortium and club. The PL has absolutely no legitimate reason to insist on confidentiality if the club and consortium want an open process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It know its been said Keith knows nothing but apparently he received the statement before it went public. Also received it before Edwards and Jacobs, so I think that should be noted. He might not know everything but its clear he still has a decent line of communication with the buyers/Ashley. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 06:31, Scotty66 said:

It know its been said Keith knows nothing but apparently he received the statement before it went public. Also received it before Edwards and Jacobs, so I think that should be noted. He might not know everything but its clear he still has a decent line of communication with the buyers/Ashley. 

Expand  

He potentially took the call during the recording of Nufc matters last night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 06:55, Ben said:

He potentially took the call during the recording of Nufc matters last night.

Expand  

Yet there will still be people on here who think he’s a self serving gobshite. Whilst he may not be in the inner sanctum, he clearly is given info of what’s happening before it’s made public.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAT cases are all public unless it deals with...

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/40/schedule/4 Schedule 4, 1(2):

 

(2)In preparing that document the Tribunal shall have regard to the need for excluding, so far as practicable—

 

(a)information the disclosure of which would in its opinion be contrary to the public interest;

 

(b)commercial information the disclosure of which would or might, in its opinion, significantly harm the legitimate business interests of the undertaking to which it relates;

 

(c)information relating to the private affairs of an individual the disclosure of which would, or might, in its opinion, significantly harm his interests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 15:44, Scoot said:
Expand  

 

I think Kennedy has just inferred that (the jurisdiction challenge has failed) from the club's statement, possibly incorrectly because the wording of the statement is very unclear on that point.

 

 

Edited by Jackie Broon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 16:17, Jackie Broon said:

 

I think Kennedy has just inferred that (the jurisdiction challenge has failed) from the club's statement, possibly incorrectly because the wording of the statement is very unclear on that point.

 

 

 

Expand  

In this headline it states they’ve been told, possibly had it confirmed ?

 

Fingers crossed though.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 15:54, nbthree3 said:

CAT cases are all public unless it deals with...

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/40/schedule/4 Schedule 4, 1(2):

 

(2)In preparing that document the Tribunal shall have regard to the need for excluding, so far as practicable—

 

(a)information the disclosure of which would in its opinion be contrary to the public interest;

 

(b)commercial information the disclosure of which would or might, in its opinion, significantly harm the legitimate business interests of the undertaking to which it relates;

 

(c)information relating to the private affairs of an individual the disclosure of which would, or might, in its opinion, significantly harm his interests.

Expand  

 

 So in other words, if the information is so damaging to the PL, then they might keep it behind closed doors.  Might actually be good news for us if they do keep everything quiet then, it's a good indication that there's a lot of really bad stuff in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter that much if the CAT case goes ahead in private because all that matters is the result. Let's face it, the national media don't want the takeover to happen so even the most scandalous of revelations will barely get a mention by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 16:20, Whitley mag said:

In this headline it states they’ve been told, possibly had it confirmed ?

 

Fingers crossed though.

 

 

Expand  

 

Told... by the club's statement. The article suggests that he's just taken that from the statement, but I think he's possibly wrong.

 

"It is currently attempting to prevent the competition courts considering a claim by the sellers from taking place in public," (prevent the CAT case, which would take place in public, from going ahead) "arguing that too should be held in confidential arbitration." (arguing that the arbitration, which is confidential, should consider the claim instead)

 

 

Edited by Jackie Broon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 16:24, Jackie Broon said:

 

Told... by the club's statement. The article suggests that he's just taken that from the statement, but I think he's possibly wrong.

 

"It is currently attempting to prevent the competition courts considering a claim by the sellers from taking place in public," (prevent the CAT case, which would take place in public, from going ahead) "arguing that too should be held in confidential arbitration." (arguing that the arbitration, which is confidential, should consider the claim instead)

 

 

 

Expand  

 

Think it will be more likely has come from his mate Keith

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 16:40, et tu brute said:

 

Think it will be more likely come from his mate Keith

Expand  

 

I'm not convinced that he knows much about what is happening with the case, or that he had as much influence on the club's CAT case as he makes out (otherwise they would have reimbursed him for his work on it). I get the impression from him and Kennedy of people desperately trying to appear relevant and ITK when really they've just been used when it's been in the club/consortium's interest and know fuck all other than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 16:57, Jackie Broon said:

 

I'm not convinced that he knows much about what is happening with the case, or that he had as much influence on the club's CAT case as he makes out (otherwise they would have reimbursed him for his work on it). I get the impression from him and Kennedy of people desperately trying to appear relevant and ITK when really they've just been used when it's been in the club/consortium's interest and know fuck all other than that.

Expand  

 

Seemingly he got a call from the club during the pre-recorded show last night about the statement coming out. Somebody who is watching tonight can confirm that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/07/2021 at 17:01, et tu brute said:

 

Seemingly he got a call from the club during the pre-recorded show last night about the statement coming out. Somebody who is watching tonight can confirm that. 

Expand  

 

Not saying he doesn't have contact with the club / consortium, but I really don't think he's being told anything of note.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...