Thiago Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Only been there since 2019. Kind of hope we can sway him with the talk of a huge long term project. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Does that article say anything or is it just a reminder that we held talks with him last month just in case we'd forgotten? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, Stal said: Does that article say anything or is it just a reminder that we held talks with him last month just in case we'd forgotten? Previously it was that Brighton had given us permission to speak with him. Now it's we have spoken with him. So not a big update really but still encouraging. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 How long we seem to take to do stuff worries me a bit, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 5 minutes ago, Smal said: How long we seem to take to do stuff worries me a bit, like. Double edged sword. You could also see it as them being meticulous in sounding out the best fit. We know what dribbles into the press, but we could've spoken to a few candidates in that time. I'd also imagine this is one of the biggest appointments in regards to the club's vision being realised. Or we could just be slow as fuck like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiago Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 8 minutes ago, Smal said: How long we seem to take to do stuff worries me a bit, like. What's your definition of long? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 10 minutes ago, Smal said: How long we seem to take to do stuff worries me a bit, like. 😆 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, Thiago said: What's your definition of long? 4 inches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuv Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 1 minute ago, madras said: 4 inches. Jammy sod Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 1 minute ago, Thiago said: What's your definition of long? I dunno. They've been after the club since uh... October 2017. With that in mind you'd assume there has been some planning done in the meantime so they'll know what structure and types of people they want in place. It seems to be taking a while longer than clubs usually take to make appointments (or indeed sack people); especially considering the precarious position the club is in. Caulkin has mentioned a decision making structure in place within PIF numerous times and perhaps that's not working to our advantage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 1 minute ago, Smal said: I dunno. They've been after the club since uh... October 2017. With that in mind you'd assume there has been some planning done in the meantime so they'll know what structure and types of people they want in place. It seems to be taking a while longer than clubs usually take to make appointments (or indeed sack people); especially considering the precarious position the club is in. Caulkin has mentioned a decision making structure in place within PIF numerous times and perhaps that's not working to our advantage. But in those years, our targets will have changed, be employed elsewhere, got tied into contracts or projects, like Rafa. Re: sack/employ people- we’re no worse than most clubs, and are actually better than a lot - as has been previously pointed out, Spurs took months in the summer to employ Nuno (after speaking to Conte and numerous others)- and they had a well run club with people in key positions at the time. Staveley and the like have literally walked into an empty shell of a club that needs EVERYTHING changing or updating. This takes time….longer than you’ve given it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzaschicken Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 29 minutes ago, Smal said: How long we seem to take to do stuff worries me a bit, like. Why how productive have you been over the 2 week Xmas break? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzaschicken Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 18 minutes ago, madras said: 4 inches. Stop bragging 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiago Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 8 minutes ago, Smal said: I dunno. They've been after the club since uh... October 2017. With that in mind you'd assume there has been some planning done in the meantime so they'll know what structure and types of people they want in place. It seems to be taking a while longer than clubs usually take to make appointments (or indeed sack people); especially considering the precarious position the club is in. Caulkin has mentioned a decision making structure in place within PIF numerous times and perhaps that's not working to our advantage. I just think they've been here less than six months. Think about what they've changed already, all while the club desperately tries to avoid relegation. You're selling new hires on two very different possibilities. I think after 14 years of stasis and neglect I'm happy to wait until the summer for these early building blocks to be put down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagCA Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 Absolutely not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 Fuck that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, MagCA said: What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. why would you post something so horrible on St. Trippier's Day? Edited January 6, 2022 by thomas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 3 minutes ago, MagCA said: What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. Handy when you’re looking for a last minute “equaliser” (one for the older generation) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagCA Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 I get that the man is a walking disaster but I can't deny he was very good at maximising profits for the red scum further down the road. I'm aware it's a daft idea but just throwing something to talk about eh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, MagCA said: What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. Absolutely not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Pilgrim Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 8 minutes ago, MagCA said: What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. Yeah and while we’re at it let’s get Fred West in to do some building maintenance and put Ian Huntley in charge of the under 15s Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 2 minutes ago, MagCA said: I get that the man is a walking disaster but I can't deny he was very good at maximising profits for the red scum further down the road. I'm aware it's a daft idea but just throwing something to talk about eh. Considering our sponsors are likely to be from Saudi I don't think we need to worry about maximising profits and the fact that Man-U fans hate him speaks volumes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, MagCA said: What would be the general consensus of approaching Ed Woodward for the role of CEO? I'd be open to it, if kept away from recruitment decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now