madras Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 2 minutes ago, Wild Geese said: Any chance we appeal the Red Card ? Mistimed tackle, no malice ! But dangerous. We won't appeal and if we did it wouldn't get overturned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Nah, that won't get overturned. It was a fair decision imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 (edited) No chance of getting it appealed like, it’s one of those where it’s clear it should be a red when you imagine the shoe being on the other foot. More tackles should be reds though, just make the punishment fairer to suit. The fact he ran around booting the fuck out of people minutes before probably won’t help his case either Edited February 1, 2023 by Hanshithispantz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Geese Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Your probably right fellas ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
petenufc1985 Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Fabinho's was worse and stayed on. Cunts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancing Brave Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 3 minutes ago, petenufc1985 said: Fabinho's was worse and stayed on. Cunts Referees' body PGMOL admitted it should have been a red. Makes VAR just look stupid. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64461183 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Knowing our luck we’d appeal and he’d get an extra game added on for a frivolous appeal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 There’s absolutely zero chance an appeal would be successful. Just suck it up and use it as an opportunity to get other people some minutes. They’ll be playing out of their skins to prove themselves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 It's a stonewall red. I don't it was a malicious challenge, but it was definitely reckless and put his opponent at risk. I'm gutted that we'll lose his control and creativity, particularly v Liverpool. Every cloud has a silver lining though, Joe will come back into midfield where he's more effective and it'll give one of more creative wingers an opportunity. With Gordon a newbie and Isak potentially out of action, I'll be surprised if it isn't ASM. If we play to his strengths he has the potential to have Coufal and TAA on toast. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 It’s a red card, but a 3 game when he actually went for the ball when another player gets the same suspension for snapping someone on purpose or hitting someone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 11 minutes ago, bowlingcrofty said: Knowing our luck we’d appeal and he’d get an extra game added on for a frivolous appeal. I hate that an appeal is met with further punishment. Wtf is that stupidity? You don’t get to speak up or defend yourself? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 6 minutes ago, The Prophet said: It's a stonewall red. I don't it was a malicious challenge, but it was definitely reckless and put his opponent at risk. So why didn't Salisu see red for nearly taking Miggy's head off? I don't think it (Salisu) was anything other than a foul, just pointing out that if you go on potential impact without intent then this was probably more dangerous in potential impact than Bruno's. For me Bruno's was a red for a mistimed challenge above the ankle but its a crime worthy of a one match ban, not 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 4 minutes ago, Kanji said: I hate that an appeal is met with further punishment. Wtf is that stupidity? You don’t get to speak up or defend yourself? It is a bit stupid, but I think it’s designed to stop teams from appealing so they can play the next game which maybe a key game when there is a quick turnaround of fixtures. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Blatant red card but it wasn't malicious or high Just frustrating that we didn't have the same VAR officials as the one that deemed a far worse tackle, which was malicious as just a yellow card a few days earlier Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 44 minutes ago, Dancing Brave said: Referees' body PGMOL admitted it should have been a red. Makes VAR just look stupid. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64461183 Why isn't he being banned for three games now then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 tbh Fabinho being banned for our match would have possibly worked in Liverpool's favour with the way he's been playing this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Dancer Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 I'm now somewhat ridiculously terrified that there's a royal death or horrific weather that leads to the postponement of one of our games The mackems will probably ring a bomb scare to SJP this weekend or something. Not ideal he misses the 3 league games either, mind. Great chance to pick up at least 7 points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 He'll be fresh as for our biggest game in 24 years! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizza Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 6 minutes ago, Chicken Dancer said: The mackems will probably ring a bomb scare to SJP this weekend or something. Don't go giving them ideas man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 7 minutes ago, Nobody said: Why isn't he being banned for three games now then? Hiding behind the wording that says retrospective action for violent conduct in the process of challenging for the ball can only be made where the incident was not seen. Assuming VAR looked at it and said nothing doing then it was seen by the officials. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancing Brave Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 14 minutes ago, Nobody said: Why isn't he being banned for three games now then? A very good question. He should be banned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 He doesn't mess around with the old social media. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Wants to bang Longstaff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted February 1, 2023 Share Posted February 1, 2023 Made 1999 look like 1899 ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now