Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"According to Opta Joe, when the Magpies defence consists of big Dan Burn, Kieran Trippier, Sven Botman and Fabian Schar, the team invariably doesn’t lose, with just a single loss in the 23 games that the quartet have played together."

 

This is the big factor why Burn wont be rested or Targett played instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure that argument follows though. Of course our results and defence have been great, but you still need to examine every part of it to see where improvements can be made.

 

Bowen is a very tricky though and he won’t face such a difficult challenge every week. 

 

 

Edited by AyeDubbleYoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree he was knackered from the off and was really poor individually, but it's pretty much impossible to drop him because he is a part of the defence with the most clean sheets in the league that has conceded 6 goals fewer than anyone else.

 

He is very important tactically. Teams cannot switch play to his area of the pitch aerially because he will just win the ball. Even though he was poor tonight therer were times where West Ham were desperate to get the ball over to Bowen direct but couldn't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Wonder how much Forest would give us for him in he summer. 

 

Posts like these are a joke and embarrassing as fuck.

 

He had a poor game but he has been a magnificent signing and even if we buy a new LB he will be a great backup at two positions while being amazing presence in the locker room. 

 

 

Edited by Pata

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the exception of Tottenham and Man City away second half of last season we were just as solid defensively as we are this season, when Targett was the primary LB and looked excellent.

 

I don't think our defensive record this season with the current back 4 is justification for not starting to bring Targett into the mix. I don't mind Burn though, and every player should be allowed to have off days without people starting to wish them benched, sold or given away to Darlington.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a 6ft 7 centre back playing at left back. We know he's a very good defender and a good player. Him being knackered impacts on how well he can play. I'm of the opinion that he needs a rest rather than him having flaws in his game 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just now, The College Dropout said:

??

 

His level is not as high as the rest. Trippier, Botman, Schar were all arguably worse than Burn today. Burn did Burn things in the main. Botman? Looked a total donkey out the blue. 

 

I thought it was just an expert brutal assessment of his performance, to be honest, because he was truly fucking awful. I gave you too much credit.

 

Technically what you said is still true, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rich said:

 

I thought it was just an expert brutal assessment of his performance, to be honest, because he was truly fucking awful. I gave you too much credit.

 

Technically what you said is still true, though.

[emoji38] yeh he was awful. But honestly he’s not usually THAT much better. He’s been a consistently tolerated weak link.  
 

I thought it was Botman that got twisted up for the second and I was annoyed and shocked. When i realised it was Burn I thought ‘aye, that’s typical Burn defending - getting done by a bit of guile, over commuting then turned’. 

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...