Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Rich

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tsunami said:

I’d like us to have a 3rd striker, a goal scorer, by all means a young lad with potential.

 

Playing centre forward and scoring goals while doing it is a specialised and very hard thing to do. We can’t be saying that Gordon/ ASM or anyone else in the squad other than Wilson or Isak can do it. Wilson will get injured; he’s looking like he needs a rest already.


You might get away with it for a couple of games (unless you really are a Man City) but look at Chelsea, they’ve got a fantastic squad and Havertz playing up top. Bonkers.

 

In practice I doubt few would disagree, including Ashworth and Howe. But we're not going to have a perfect squad overnight. It's honestly a fucking miracle we shipped out Wood and Shelvey. Fraser would be another big win, but even then we'd still have a handful of players we'd prefer to not have. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PauloGeordio said:

Elements of our fan base! 
 

903BEF09-A08D-4EEA-B945-47D83F2938B6.thumb.jpeg.37dfe71bdc2b70ae01ae77adee631c0d.jpeg

 

:sweetjesus:

Went back a week or so on his timeline and would be amazed if he was actually a genuine Newcastle fan. Likely one from down the road on a windup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks too complicated that. I wouldn't want us outlaying 40m for him in the summer because we are obliged to pay it and not have the finance to go after Maddison or Neves.

 

Perhaps we could do both, but I doubt we would. Berge for half that would be a solid addition and keep our powder dry for the summer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not against signing Gallagher, but my main concern about the lack of depth in our midfield is Bruno getting injured because it means we're reliant on Longstaff playing the no.6 role. I think I'd feel more comfortable having Berge as a replacement as he would play as a 6 whereas Gallagher is more of an 8.

I also think if we had Berge we could play Bruno as an 8 some games.

 

 

Edited by Alberto2005

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope we're not.

 

I can just about buy into one very expensive 20 something English player that I don't particularly rate, not sure I could buy into another one - not when we've seen what that amount of money has got us in Botman and Bruno anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

I really hope we're not.

 

I can just about buy into one very expensive 20 something English player that I don't particularly rate, not sure I could buy into another one - not when we've seen what that amount of money has got us in Botman and Bruno anyway.

All cogs in Eddies machine, no one cog more important than the other in the overall marauding masterpiece that he is painting! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

I really hope we're not.

 

I can just about buy into one very expensive 20 something English player that I don't particularly rate, not sure I could buy into another one - not when we've seen what that amount of money has got us in Botman and Bruno anyway.

Yeah, imagine that one Anthony Gordon cost 120 percent of a Bruno Guimaraes. The English tax is insane, like. [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HaydnNUFC said:

Gallagher is not worth £40m-£45m. Hope this link goes away. :lol:

You can understand why they would ask for that much, we spent that on someone far less proven who isn’t much younger.

 

 

Edited by SUPERTOON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...