Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our "interest" is just a smokescreen. Pretending we're interested so Newcastle fully focus on Sesko which gives us a clear run at DCL. 

 

This isn't Ratcliffe's first rodeo lads. You're being played like a fiddle. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

If Liverpool is the only game in town, then it makes little sense in just giving in and selling to the clowns.

It was also the logic that was used to drive up Mbeumo's price. In Isak's case Liverpool are acting like its a reason to drive the price down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, nufc123 said:

Only Liverpool, he only wants Liverpool, thats the only option.

He'd be insane to turn down a club like PSG. If that's the case, then, well, that's his problem. His contract has 3 years remaining. If he wants to sulk, then so be it. But the club cannot allow Liverpool to get one over them. If they didn't take Ekitike, I'd stil probably feel this way. But that has been a force multiplier by a thousand fold for me. Fuck the cunts should be our number one strategy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Froggy said:

Our "interest" is just a smokescreen. Pretending we're interested so Newcastle fully focus on Sesko which gives us a clear run at DCL. 

 

This isn't Ratcliffe's first rodeo lads. You're being played like a fiddle. 


what’s your honest take, Froggy.

Ive been with some Man Utd fans today and they reckon he’s holding out for you but hedging his bets.

 

but I don’t quite get that take, it doesn’t make much sense really (unless you don’t have the coin so he’s waiting for sales until you do).

 

equally, we’ve bid and he hasn’t committed to us either so that doesn’t bode well.

 

what’s your take?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vinny Green Balls said:

He'd be insane to turn down a club like PSG. If that's the case, then, well, that's his problem. His contract has 3 years remaining. If he wants to sulk, then so be it. But the club cannot allow Liverpool to get one over them. If they didn't take Ekitike, I'd stil probably feel this way. But that has been a force multiplier by a thousand fold for me. Fuck the cunts should be our number one strategy.

Sorry I was just trying to do a Romano.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lovejoy said:

what’s your honest take, Froggy.

Ive been with some Man Utd fans today and they reckon he’s holding out for you but hedging his bets.

 

but I don’t quite get that take, it doesn’t make much sense really (unless you don’t have the coin so he’s waiting for sales until you do).

 

equally, we’ve bid and he hasn’t committed to us either so that doesn’t bode well.

 

what’s your take?

 

Not sure to be honest. Think if he showed that he wanted to come to us we'd have bid already. Romano has said we have told Leipzig we'll bid if the player indicates he wants to join us, so you'd have to assume that hasn't happened yet. 

 

I don't like the idea of buying another developing striker for that sort of money though. Really wouldn't be too upset missing out on this guy and my personal preference is to give Hojlund another season to develop rather than spending £70m on someone who might not even adapt to the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

He'd be insane to turn down a club like PSG. If that's the case, then, well, that's his problem. His contract has 3 years remaining. If he wants to sulk, then so be it. But the club cannot allow Liverpool to get one over them. If they didn't take Ekitike, I'd stil probably feel this way. But that has been a force multiplier by a thousand fold for me. Fuck the cunts should be our number one strategy.

He’s making a joke about the press and Liverpool fans.

You honestly think Isak is turning down Paris to play for Champions League winners PSG to go and live in Liverpool? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

We haven't had a bid accepted.

Do we believe Hope's quote that we're giving 24 hours then? Edit: done myself up like a kipper. went back re-watched Hope video and it's not a deadline just that they want it done in 24hr wtf wrong with me heed

 

If our bid was not accepted / deemed insufficient (Ornstein), have we just said alreet we're pulling out soon so reconsider?

 

You'd think if our bid was amended/resubmitted, some mug would have leaked that by now too. 

 

 

Edited by Casey
noting error

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Casey said:

Do we believe Hope's quote that we're giving 24 hours then?

 

If our bid was not accepted / deemed insufficient (Ornstein), have we just said alreet we're pulling out tomorrow so reconsider?

 

You'd think if our bid was amended/resubmitted, some mug would have leaked that by now too. 

 

 

 

Where’s Hopes quote?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Casey said:

Do we believe Hope's quote that we're giving 24 hours then?

 

If our bid was not accepted / deemed insufficient (Ornstein), have we just said alreet we're pulling out tomorrow so reconsider?

 

You'd think if our bid was amended/resubmitted, some mug would have leaked that by now too. 

 

 

 

 

I don't think any of these journalists have a clue what's going on.

 

We'll be working on agreeing on conditions that suit Leipzig, after they wanted changes made to the structure of the bid we put in.

 

Until we actually have a bid accepted all the chat going on is just noise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...