Benjamin Šeško (playing for Man United)

[craigmadge]

Šešno

[St1pe]

I’m quite happy with the wording of that Ornstein tweet “reflects man u’s valuation”. Doesn’t really matter if Leipzig don’t accept it in favour of a higher bid though. The twitter puppets are pushing it hard though. 

[gbandit]

Just now, TheBrownBottle said:

Genuine question - why would he cause unrest?

Because him and his agent would be itching to move on at every window 

[Yorkie]

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

6 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

 take me back to the days where we didn't try to sign the best players around, save me from the humiliation of being ambitious!

Yorkie man, trying to sigh then and coming up handy isn't a good outcome just so your aware

 

Well there's policy and then there's delivery. 

 

Our policy isn't embarrassing. I don't think the lack of delivery is particularly embarrassing either; I'm not sure how it really can be when the rules aren't fair. 

 

That's assuming this goes the way we anticipate it going. Then it's onto the next target.

 

Another 24 hours has passed since I last said all the worse players we should've gone for in the first place are still available. Still the case.

[TheBrownBottle]

Just now, gbandit said:

Because him and his agent would be itching to move on at every window 

Got you - that would be a pain in the arse, tbf

[The Butcher]

7 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said:

We must be fucking awful at selling our 'project' like

What project?

[maybe_next_year]

Honestly, out of all the strikers we've been linked to signing (Ekitike, Pedro, Delap), this seems like the greatest risk, so not the end of the world if we lose out to Man U. I can't see him succeeding there, I'm not sure I can see him being a huge success here either... 

[TK-421]

2 minutes ago, Geordie Magpie said:

Not over til it's over 🤣

IF that's true, just shows the arrogance of them, to offer less than the other offer on the table, just because its them. 

[JT24]

 

[Joe_F]

Just now, TK-421 said:

IF that's true, just shows the arrogance of them, to offer less than the other offer on the table, just because its them. 

"Special club"

[Big Geordie]

Yup - can on y see him going to the Mancs now. £££ wins the day. 

 

I can only hope that we have other targets to shift on to quickly. Summer is close to being a write off transfer wise - cartel have it sewn up due to PSR.

[Froggy]

Just now, Big Geordie said:

Yup - can on y see him going to the Mancs now. £££ wins the day. 

 

You're offering a higher transfer fee and the same wages though? 

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

 

Well there's policy and then there's delivery. 

 

Our policy isn't embarrassing. I don't think the lack of delivery is particularly embarrassing either; I'm not sure how it really can be when the rules aren't fair. 

 

That's assuming this goes the way we anticipate it going. Then it's onto the next target.

 

Another 24 hours has passed since I last said all the worse players we should've gone for in the first place are still available. Still the case.

I disagree, if the policy isn't realistic then it is embarrassing imo. 

 

I get the idea of trying to make this but splash like we've arrived but the reality is the second a cartel member is interested we end up being second fiddle. 

 

Let's see how this all works out. 

[Turnbull2000]

We're never going to close the gap, are we? Fuck me this is depressing.

[KingArthur]

Just now, Froggy said:

 

You're offering a higher transfer fee and the same wages though? 

How do you know what the wages are?

[David Edgar]

Maybe he wants to find his feet in a bigger league at a mid table club before taking a step up?

[Coffee_Johnny]

29 minutes ago, Deuce said:

“Newcastle and United” oh Fab you are a star. 

He no doubt mouths each word he types, might be tricky saying Manchester with a mouth full of Cinghiale cum. 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, Turnbull2000 said:

We're never going to close the gap, are we? Fuck me this is depressing.

 

Actually it's Man Utd trying to close the gap on us, but I agree with your point

[thomas]

1 minute ago, JT24 said:

 

 

[ohmelads]

Just now, Froggy said:

 

You're offering a higher transfer fee and the same wages though? 

 

Where does it say we're offering the same wages?

[Froggy]

Just now, KingArthur said:

How do you know what the wages are?

 

Haven't Romano etc. been reporting that personal terms are no issue to either club? To me that reads like you'll offer him what he wants.

[TRon]

21 minutes ago, Deuce said:

Sure, but he’s also just 22 years-old.

 

 

Yeah he's 22. Not 12.

 

 

[Keegans Export]

8 minutes ago, Geordie Magpie said:

Not over til it's over 🤣

Clearly just covering all bases there

[TheBrownBottle]

4 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

Well there's policy and then there's delivery. 

 

Our policy isn't embarrassing. I don't think the lack of delivery is particularly embarrassing either; I'm not sure how it really can be when the rules aren't fair. 

 

That's assuming this goes the way we anticipate it going. Then it's onto the next target.

 

Another 24 hours has passed since I last said all the worse players we should've gone for in the first place are still available. Still the case.

Are our owners unaware of the rules?

 

I’m not sure it’s embarrassing but it isn’t a good look, either.  

[Froggy]

Just now, ohmelads said:

Where does it say we're offering the same wages?

 

Where does it say we're offering more?