Pata Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: At this point we need to start working from the bottom of the list up so we can end up with who we want, we're a glorified scouting department for the cartel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyBartoon Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Hhtoon said: By all accounts a lower fee was agreed by all parties so why would triggering the release clause have made a difference? Because there’s no evidence that Liverpool were actually interested a few weeks back. They’ve took advantage of the well publicised release clause-which we should have done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Minhosa said: We’ve simply GOT to find a way of completing deals without them leaking. Maybe we’re gonna have to come up with a way of incentivising agents in a way that nobody else is doing to take away this constant fucking shite of getting pipped at the post. Maybe a bigger fee if the deal completes more quickly? The agent fee decreases with every day that passes. I dunno, there’s got to be some way of improving what we’re currently doing man. This is shite. If the client would prefer to go to Liverpool and the agent is not making an effort to make that happen because we're paying him a higher agent fee then the agent is breaching his fiduciary duties and should be sacked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, duo said: I am sure when we signed the likes of Bruno, Botman - even Tonali the first we heard about it was when the deal was pretty much done. Aye true. Maybe it’s not as prevalent as it feels right now. I dunno man. I cannot go through another summer like last year again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Minhosa said: We’ve simply GOT to find a way of completing deals without them leaking. Maybe we’re gonna have to come up with a way of incentivising agents in a way that nobody else is doing to take away this constant fucking shite of getting pipped at the post. Maybe a bigger fee if the deal completes more quickly? The agent fee decreases with every day that passes. I dunno, there’s got to be some way of improving what we’re currently doing man. This is shite. It’s another failure of due diligence for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaj Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, duo said: They made a 'late move' man - we just procrastinated on this deal They probably would have made the late move last week as well, changes fuck all! Agent has used us to get Liverpool who they would have known for a long time to be interested in him to bid for him. Romana has been the one on the ball with this one the whole time, he gets paid to put shit out there! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Guarantee he'll go there, barely play and be back in Spain in 2 years time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) I know there's no point in saying the obvious again because people have already made their minds up, but it matters not when or how much we offered, we were always going to get played by a team who can pay what they want, when they want and whatever wages they want. szoboszlai, ekitike, isak and more, its by design and it's on purpose. You're all angry at the wrong people. Edited 11 hours ago by Mattoon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Cucked and it's only June, jesuswept. The PTSD is flooding back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, duo said: I am sure when we signed the likes of Bruno, Botman - even Tonali the first we heard about it was when the deal was pretty much done. Botman signed 6 months after we heard about it, Bruno wasn't that quick, but Tonali was definitely done in a day or so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, Minhosa said: Aye true. Maybe it’s not as prevalent as it feels right now. I dunno man. I cannot go through another summer like last year again. Looks like you already are, could worse if we lose Tonali and Hall. If Bruno goes Howe will to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, JoeyBartoon said: Because there’s no evidence that Liverpool were actually interested a few weeks back. They’ve took advantage of the well publicised release clause-which we should have done The release clause doesn't force the player to leave. It forces the selling club to let the player leave if he wants to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, oldtype said: If the client would prefer to go to Liverpool and the agent is not making an effort to make that happen because we're paying him a higher agent fee then the agent is breaching his fiduciary duties and should be sacked. If we were the only bid agreed at that time and the agent was incentivised not to leak the fuck out of it, his client would have taken the deal tbqh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaj Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said: Liverpool fans are like 'who is this lad?' Fear the scouse twats are going to be very good next season, with peak Isak leading the way. Yep Wirtz will be another level next year as well and they’ll sign Diomande or Barcola (or both) to replace Salah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, oldtype said: If the client would prefer to go to Liverpool and the agent is not making an effort to make that happen because we're paying him a higher agent fee then the agent is breaching his fiduciary duties and should be sacked. The player had by all accounts agreed - it was pissing about with the fee which was causing the delay. This is a competence issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGSC Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago On to Dwight McNeil then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Well this is a bit of a come down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Guys don't cope seriously, he's obviously someone they've also tracked but weren't in a hurry to get done. Obviously if they wanted him they move when the competition does. You all drive yourselves mad thinking they do this to stop us, when we simply aren't even competitive to these lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Minhosa said: If we were the only bid agreed at that time and the agent was incentivised not to leak the fuck out of it, his client would have taken the deal tbqh. If Liverpool has interest and the agent conceals it from his client because he wants us to sign with the only accepted bid currently on the table, he is breaching his fiduciary duties and should be sacked. People really need to get it into their heads that the agent is just a vehicle for executing on the player's own interests. Edited 11 hours ago by oldtype Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, Vaj said: They probably would have made the late move last week as well, changes fuck all! Agent has used us to get Liverpool who they would have known for a long time to be interested in him to bid for him. Romana has been the one on the ball with this one the whole time, he gets paid to put shit out there! We don't know that - what we do know is we didn't activate the clause - Liverpool did and have got the player. If he was our No.1 target to replace Gordon just pay the fucking release clause. If Liverpool then come in - then so be it. But atm it's looking like we weren't willing to pay it and Liverpool were. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, Hhtoon said: On that basis, let's offer more than the release clause...oh wait, he would still prefer Liverpool That may be the case but at least it ends things quickly rather than weeks of back and forth discussions or just maybe it forces the players hand and he makes the choice to sign rather than wait and see if something better comes along and risks losing the deal he has (nothing like a bit of jeopardy). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyBartoon Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Hhtoon said: The release clause doesn't force the player to leave. It forces the selling club to let the player leave if he wants to. Exactly. You’d find out straight away whether he’s keen. If he’s not you move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Minhosa said: If we were the only bid agreed at that time and the agent was incentivised not to leak the fuck out of it, his client would have taken the deal tbqh. Not at this early stage of the season. Zero need for him to decide days ago and every reason to wait. And it paid off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Just now, oldtype said: If Liverpool has interest and the agent conceals it from his client because he wants us to sign with the only accepted bid currently on the table, he is breaching his fiduciary duties and should be sacked. Top players have tonnes of clubs who might, theoretically, be interested in them. If the selling club has accepted a bid from NUFC and we have properly incentivised the agent then the deal has a much greater likelihood of getting done without being leaked to stoke more interest. That’s the point. Tonali to Spurs is another example of an Agent leaking the deal to generate more interest in his client. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, JoeyBartoon said: Exactly. You’d find out straight away whether he’s keen. If he’s not you move on. But he could be keen to come and then more keen to go to Liverpool when he finds out they're interested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now