Jose Mourinho

[TRC]

He does have a point mind.

[Robster]

What did he say ?

 

[Astroblack]

Pure entertainment. Would rather have him in the PL than not.

[jdckelly]

Pure entertainment. Would rather have him in the PL than not.

yeah I'd rather watch entertainment on the field than some asshole talking shit and mourinhio teams are not fun to watch despite how much resources he consistently has at his disposal

[Astroblack]

That's true, too. But at least it's something to talk about. Anything to distract me from our own troubles.

[DJ_NUFC]

I'm glad he mentioned Steve McClaren So random and awesome. Cranking up the psychology games against McShteve before tomorrow! Don't worry, he's already fucking crumbled.

[NEEJ]

I have to say, this attack on Pardew from Mourinho is a bit out of the blue.

[KaKa]

He does have a point mind.

 

No he doesn't.

[Elliottman]

I have to say, this attack on Pardew from Mourinho is a bit out of the blue.

 

 

what's he said?

[Dan Gleebals]

Alan. Sideways, frontfoot, organized - special silver Fox.

[Anon]

I have to say, this attack on Pardew from Mourinho is a bit out of the blue.

 

 

what's he said?

 

Certain managers are allowed to talk about the officials and push them in the technical area.

[LV]

I have to say, this attack on Pardew from Mourinho is a bit out of the blue.

 

 

what's he said?

 

Certain managers are allowed to talk about the officials and push them in the technical area.

 

He's talking about Wenger rather than Pardew.

[NEEJ]

I was hoping people would have seen his quotes. Everything he said could so easily have been about Pardew's time here.

[Dave]

“I think maybe one of the reasons why Newcastle over the years doesn’t get good positions is because of this mentality, it’s because they choose some matches to sweat blood and in other matches, they don’t. This is an attitude typical of a team that wins nothing.

 

“It’s bad for them because if they play like this, they win many matches at home, and they don’t. But this is their problem.

 

“The reality is that they fought hard, they gave everything, they followed a line that many pundits gave straight away – you have to fight, you have to kick, you have to tackle, you have to run, so they were exactly that, and they fought for a point, and I think they deserved a point the way they fought.”

 

Hard to argue with the twat, apart from the bit about deserving a point.

[Mike]

That first bit cuts deep.

[BillClinton]

actually agree with the cunt

[Shak]

That first bit cuts deep.

 

Dude is a European Belichick.

 

Fucking shitbag.

[Hanshithispantz]

There's just no need for it.

[Mike]

That first bit cuts deep.

 

Dude is a European Belichick.

 

Fucking shitbag.

 

It's a motherfucker when you hate a dude, but he's right.

[B-more Mag]

Super insightful, Jose. Thanks for that. Cunt.

[BillClinton]

That first bit cuts deep.

 

Dude is a European Belichick.

 

f***ing shitbag.

 

Never been caught cheating or playing a Trump supporting QB.

[LRD]

“I think maybe one of the reasons why Newcastle over the years doesn’t get good positions is because of this mentality, it’s because they choose some matches to sweat blood and in other matches, they don’t. This is an attitude typical of a team that wins nothing.

 

“It’s bad for them because if they play like this, they win many matches at home, and they don’t. But this is their problem.

 

“The reality is that they fought hard, they gave everything, they followed a line that many pundits gave straight away – you have to fight, you have to kick, you have to tackle, you have to run, so they were exactly that, and they fought for a point, and I think they deserved a point the way they fought.”

 

Hard to argue with the t***, apart from the bit about deserving a point.

 

Reminds me of this post by tmonkey, the Pardew bit aside:

 

The players were far more motivated against Liverpool than today. If thinking about the "Why?", there's only one logical answer - it's because the players motivated themselves against Liverpool and Pardew had nothing to do with it. Just like our players have frequently upped their game against the "big boys" over the past decade no matter who the manager was (Souness, Roeder, Allardyce, JFK, etc etc). We've had teams who have been hopeless and unable to string a couple of passes together against crap like Derby, Boro, Bolton, and other relegation fodder, but as soon as the likes of ManU roll into town the same helpless team is instantly transformed into a side that can compete against the best for 60-70 minutes at least. Again, that's entirely because the players motivate themselves for whatever reasons, and nothing to do with the manager. It's not trying to deny Pardew credit, it's just obvious footballing basics here - it's minnows vs the top dogs in the FA Cup and the various aspects of sports psychology that affects that type of game.

 

http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,93975.msg4698036/topicseen.html#msg4698036

 

Play well against big clubs in televised matches, get noticed and earn that big-money move. Which is why many of our players are rarely likeable.

[Sima]

He would have been here after Sir Bobby had Porto lost to Man Utd in that Semi Final. It seems he has a massive soft spot for us.

 

He's still an arsehole, mind.

[Interpolic]

“I think maybe one of the reasons why Newcastle over the years doesn’t get good positions is because of this mentality, it’s because they choose some matches to sweat blood and in other matches, they don’t. This is an attitude typical of a team that wins nothing.

 

“It’s bad for them because if they play like this, they win many matches at home, and they don’t. But this is their problem.

 

“The reality is that they fought hard, they gave everything, they followed a line that many pundits gave straight away – you have to fight, you have to kick, you have to tackle, you have to run, so they were exactly that, and they fought for a point, and I think they deserved a point the way they fought.”

 

Hard to argue with the t***, apart from the bit about deserving a point.

 

Reminds me of this post by tmonkey, the Pardew bit aside:

 

The players were far more motivated against Liverpool than today. If thinking about the "Why?", there's only one logical answer - it's because the players motivated themselves against Liverpool and Pardew had nothing to do with it. Just like our players have frequently upped their game against the "big boys" over the past decade no matter who the manager was (Souness, Roeder, Allardyce, JFK, etc etc). We've had teams who have been hopeless and unable to string a couple of passes together against crap like Derby, Boro, Bolton, and other relegation fodder, but as soon as the likes of ManU roll into town the same helpless team is instantly transformed into a side that can compete against the best for 60-70 minutes at least. Again, that's entirely because the players motivate themselves for whatever reasons, and nothing to do with the manager. It's not trying to deny Pardew credit, it's just obvious footballing basics here - it's minnows vs the top dogs in the FA Cup and the various aspects of sports psychology that affects that type of game.

 

http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,93975.msg4698036/topicseen.html#msg4698036

 

Play well against big clubs in televised matches, get noticed and earn that big-money move. Which is why many of our players are rarely likeable.

 

I agree there seems to be a difference in mentality but it's just as much about us not having a clue how to unlock a defence when the opponent sits deep and the onus is on us IMO.

[Disco]

Delicious - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3298903/Chelsea-team-member-lose-win-Jose-Mourinho.html