Pons Alias Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 Enjoy: http://www.spurscommunity.co.uk/index.php?threads/worst-since.126745/page-3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 They even mentioned the installments thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 They even mentioned the installments thing. I'd like to buy a car with similar terms: "Hi, I'd like to get this £50 000 car please. I wont pay the full amount though, but what I will do is pay you £500 a year over a period of 100 years, but only as long as I keep the car. Sounds good? Perfect" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Hope they can't return him after 18 months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Enjoy: http://www.spurscommunity.co.uk/index.php?threads/worst-since.126745/page-3 I may be being a bit thick here so bear with me but... Ok, let me get this straight: we signed Sissoko for "30 mil," but that number only matters if he stays/plays with us for 5 years? So if, say, we cut him in the summer- we are free and clear of him, having only spunked 6 mil on the lad?!? So again- the "30 mil" number is kind of meaningless? Yes? So in no way are we obligated to actually pay the "30 mil" figure-- unless we keep him for five years?!? We're only obligated to pay Newcastle for one season of his service--- 6 mil?!? I thought the way it works is "Sissoko signed by Spurs for 30 mil" (http://www.espnfc.us/story/2941679/tottenham-hotspur-sign-newcastle-united-midfielder-moussa-sissoko) means that- regardless of how it's divvied up, and whatever form those payments take- we are obligated to pay Newcastle 30 million Pounds for Moussa Sissoko. Is that not true? What am I missing? I figured that we were on the hook for 30 mil full stop, but that perhaps we could sell the fucker to someone- anyone- to try and get beck some of the money (say, 10 mil or something like that). What am I missing? Yes, that's exactly how it works mate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Idiots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sho Time Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Yes... it's a 5-year, £6m per season loan! Makes perfect sense! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Enjoy: http://www.spurscommunity.co.uk/index.php?threads/worst-since.126745/page-3 I may be being a bit thick here so bear with me but... Ok, let me get this straight: we signed Sissoko for "30 mil," but that number only matters if he stays/plays with us for 5 years? So if, say, we cut him in the summer- we are free and clear of him, having only spunked 6 mil on the lad?!? So again- the "30 mil" number is kind of meaningless? Yes? So in no way are we obligated to actually pay the "30 mil" figure-- unless we keep him for five years?!? We're only obligated to pay Newcastle for one season of his service--- 6 mil?!? I thought the way it works is "Sissoko signed by Spurs for 30 mil" (http://www.espnfc.us/story/2941679/tottenham-hotspur-sign-newcastle-united-midfielder-moussa-sissoko) means that- regardless of how it's divvied up, and whatever form those payments take- we are obligated to pay Newcastle 30 million Pounds for Moussa Sissoko. Is that not true? What am I missing? I figured that we were on the hook for 30 mil full stop, but that perhaps we could sell the f***er to someone- anyone- to try and get beck some of the money (say, 10 mil or something like that). What am I missing? Yes, that's exactly how it works mate! Ha ha ha! What a muppet! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Mind you, some people on here thought Sunderland shouldn't have to pay Inter what they owe them because Alvarez isn't there anymore, so it's believeable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Mind you, some people on here thought Sunderland shouldn't have to pay Inter what they owe them because Alvarez isn't there anymore, so it's believeable. Did they? I can't remember any posts other than laughing at them having to pay it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 Mind you, some people on here thought Sunderland shouldn't have to pay Inter what they owe them because Alvarez isn't there anymore, so it's believeable. They're in the courts in the next couple of weeks iirc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 Bit harsh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 Love to know the stats he has since moving Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted November 10, 2016 Share Posted November 10, 2016 Love to know the stats he has since moving Lots of zeros involved I'd imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted November 10, 2016 Share Posted November 10, 2016 Mind you, some people on here thought Sunderland shouldn't have to pay Inter what they owe them because Alvarez isn't there anymore, so it's believeable. This Sissoko thing is even worse though IMO, completely mental, makes literally no sense at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Sissoko joined Tottenham on transfer deadline day for £30million from Newcastle, who he failed to help save from relegation last season. The France international has made just four Premier League starts this term and he believes lack of pre-season with his new team-mates has hampered his start at White Hart Lane. The 27-year-old has missed the last two league games through suspension after appearing to elbow Bournemouth midfielder Harry Arter but will return to face West Ham after the international break "It's true that there has been a lot of mishaps; my late signing, my lack of preparation for the season, my blow to the head against Middlesbrough, and this suspension," he said. "When I arrived, I felt that my team-mates were aware of the amount of my transfer. I was not just any player, but I ignore all of this. "I was not at the top when I signed, but that's normal. They all worked well this summer while I had a mini-preparation. "The suspension fell at the wrong time. In addition, it was something involuntary. Even the opposition player said. I had to work harder than others in training and some double sessions to keep up. Moussa Sissoko says Tottenham is the biggest club he's played for "All that now is behind me. I have come out, grown up. All the lights are green. Sissoko also aimed a thinly-veiled dig at former club Newcastle, claiming Tottenham is the biggest club he's ever played for. "Tottenham is the biggest club I have known. You must convince in every game, every training session. But competition never scared me and the coach is correct. "It means playing the best players of the moment, for the team, always comes first. If we want to win something late in the season then that is how we can get there." http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/731155/Moussa-Sissoko-Tottenham-News Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Why's it a 'thinly veiled dig' like? In Sissoko's career as a footballer it's true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Haha class, he's a total dickhead. Spurs fans will probably lap that up as well and in 3 years time wonder what happened when Sissoko is shinning the ball out for throw ins from 12 yards out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Glad he's no longer our problem, off our wage bill and that Spurs were daft enough to fork out £30m for him on the back of a couple of decent games in the Euros. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 £30m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Saying the other players treated him differently because of his price tag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Saying the other players treated him differently because of his price tag Well they probably did expect more from him than what he was capable of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 What a tit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Wow, blamed absolutely everything on him being shit apart from himself. Like a young Alan Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Played 90 mins (I think?) for France last night Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now