Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

 

His mates that embarrassed he’s f***ed of??

 

Of course not.

 

What a weird thing to say.

 

There were two of them working on this, but one has now gone back to full-time work, and will only assist when he can from now on.

 

Are you involved with them?

 

Quite clear that he is

 

This is old news, Patterson explained all of this on Friday night on Nufc Matters

 

Old news, but very disappointing to read some of the disrespectful comments on here.

 

We should all be in this together.

 

Sorry, have I missed something? I was just asking if you are involved with them. Didn't mean anything by it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

His mates that embarrassed he’s f***ed of??

 

Of course not.

 

What a weird thing to say.

 

There were two of them working on this, but one has now gone back to full-time work, and will only assist when he can from now on.

 

Are you involved with them?

 

Quite clear that he is

 

This is old news, Patterson explained all of this on Friday night on Nufc Matters

 

Old news, but very disappointing to read some of the disrespectful comments on here.

 

We should all be in this together.

 

Sorry, have I missed something? I was just asking if you are involved with them. Didn't mean anything by it.

 

No problem!

 

No, I am not involved with them, though I share their ambition and opinions exactly and precisely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expect a middling development later

Please elaborate?

I hope that that wasn't a serious question.

 

I love the circle of posts which goes on in this thread.

 

1. Someone pretends to be ITK

2. People react with hope

3. ITK gets called out

4. ITK proved to be talking bollocks

5. Someone else pretends to be ITK

6. People react with hope

7. etc etc

 

That's just one page :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Any significance in this ??

 

No, it's just an annual filing requirement.

 

It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close.

 

So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Any significance in this ??

 

No, it's just an annual filing requirement.

 

It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close.

 

So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back

 

Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed.

 

Means fuck all other than the company is still 'live'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Any significance in this ??

 

No, it's just an annual filing requirement.

 

It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close.

 

So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back

 

Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed.

 

Means fuck all other than the company is still 'live'.

 

Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Any significance in this ??

 

No, it's just an annual filing requirement.

 

It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close.

 

So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back

 

Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed.

 

Means fuck all other than the company is still 'live'.

 

Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live?

 

Exactly. If the deal died when PIF pulled out these companies would be long gone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And why is there a £150m loan agreement between PCP and St James Holdings Ltd still in place and not satisfied? Surely if the deal had died that would have been cleared up by now and PCP would have walked away without their £13m deposit that is part of the agreement.

 

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/OC311146/charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...