Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

I can potentially see us signing one Chelsea player permanently, with a favourable payment structure due to Staveley's good relationship with them, and one on loan. Two from Hudson-Odoi, Pulisic, Gallacher, Broja would be ideal

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, UncleBingo said:

Hypothetical I know, but would people be happy with a straight swap with ASM for Pulisic?

Nope need both. We need a squad and 5 quality subs regularly.

 

Have always liked Pulisic. My only concern is wether he has the fitness issues similar of Michael Owen after playing so much so young. Scary that he’s only 23 as seems to of been around for ages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Garner would be a decent, affordable pick up in midfield.

 

I wouldn't hold your breath on him actually being available, given Man U's current recruitment strategy seems to involve floating ideas on Twitter and deciding what to do based on how people react to them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

I can potentially see us signing one Chelsea player permanently, with a favourable payment structure due to Staveley's good relationship with them, and one on loan. Two from Hudson-Odoi, Pulisic, Gallacher, Broja would be ideal

Good idea this.

 

Would take Gallacher perm (lower wages, consistent performer, good injury record) then loan a wide player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Magpie said:

If Gallagher does go anywhere he'll go back to Palace 

 

That's not how it works. They can't afford him outright.

 

If we bid for him and Chelsea accepts we'll sign him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, McCormick said:


Price, Kante injury, home-grown quotas and the fact that he could be a Chelsea starter after a few years.

 

We don't know what Chelsea's price is yet.

 

Kante may well be injured but Chelsea are not being hesitant about going for more signings this summer, and so they would just go and replace him and Gallagher if they sold him.

 

They are pretty strong on home grown quotas regardless with the likes of Mount, James, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah, Sterling, CHO etc.

 

As far as Gallagher being a starter after a few years, apparently he's eager to push forward after his loan last year that saw him get into the England team, and he wants to push for a World Cup place. Can't see him going from that to sitting around for two years, while Chelsea continue to recruit flashy names from all and sundry.

 

I think we'll be in with a good chance tbh. The rumoured bid from us of £40 million would be a very strong offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

That's not how it works. They can't afford him outright.

 

If we bid for him and Chelsea accepts we'll sign him.

Neither can we if we are bidding for Ramos or any other striker for that matter 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

We don't know what Chelsea's price is yet.

 

Kante may well be injured but Chelsea are not being hesitant about going for more signings this summer, and so they would just go and replace him and Gallagher if they sold him.

 

They are pretty strong on home grown quotas regardless with the likes of Mount, James, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah, Sterling, CHO etc.

 

As far as Gallagher being a starter after a few years, apparently he's eager to push forward after his loan last year that saw him get into the England team, and he wants to push for a World Cup place. Can't see him going from that to sitting around for two years, while Chelsea continue to recruit flashy names from all and sundry.

 

I think we'll be in with a good chance tbh. The rumoured bid from us of £40 million would be a very strong offer.

 

He's much better than Gordon imo and £40m is what Chelsea offered Everton. I think it'll take at least £55m for Chelsea to entertain us for Gallagher. (based on nothing but a hunch)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What worries me is that none of our supposed targets seem all that realistic. Diaby, Maddison and now Pulisic. None of them feel achievable, either through lack of player interest or through us not being able to agree a fee. 

 

Just over two weeks left and we really need attacking options if we are to kick on this season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KaKa said:

 

That's a different conversation altogether.

I get the feeling from that article and the stories of going to bid for Ramos we are looking at Chelsea players to loan not buy 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MrRaspberryJam said:

 

He's much better than Gordon imo and £40m is what Chelsea offered Everton. I think it'll take at least £55m for Chelsea to entertain us for Gallagher. (based on nothing but a hunch)

 

£55 million is in the region of what Leicester are asking for Maddison. Cannot see Chelsea asking that for Gallagher at all.

 

Chelsea typically tend to let players they aren't intent on keeping leave for fairly reasonable prices.

 

Tomori left for around £25million last summer and Abraham for around £35 million.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...