Jump to content

St James' Park


Delima

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jackie Broon said:
2 hours ago, OverThere said:

Surely Leazes Terrace could be moved brick by brick to a site close by? Is it that historically important?

 

No. Yes.

 

So historically significant that it is full of students. Makes total sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  1 hour ago, OverThere said:

 

So historically significant that it is full of students. Makes total sense.

 

That has absolutely nothing to do with its heritage significance, also, only about half of it is student accommodation the rest is houses/flats.

 

It was built in 1831 or close to that date, not that old: heritage? It is built in the same style as Grey Street, is that it? When they built Eldon Square shopping center a whole chunk of the city was altered: what is the vast difference here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OverThere said:

  1 hour ago, OverThere said:

 

So historically significant that it is full of students. Makes total sense.

 

That has absolutely nothing to do with its heritage significance, also, only about half of it is student accommodation the rest is houses/flats.

 

It was built in 1831 or close to that date, not that old: heritage? It is built in the same style as Grey Street, is that it? When they built Eldon Square shopping center a whole chunk of the city was altered: what is the vast difference here?

Eldon Square was fucking criminal

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Oh Oh, the woke squad are here. A building constructed in 1831 which is used as student accommodation and flats is "untouchable". Ridiculous

 

 

 

Is it the current use of Leazes Terrace rather than their architectural style the reason as to why it could be perceived to be expendable? It's a genuine question. I suppose there's an element of weight behind the idea that a building's use can have an impact on its value, although usage is temporary, they weren't always used for students and if it were gone then it can't be used for anything ever again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Oh Oh, the woke squad are here. A building constructed in 1831 which is used as student accommodation and flats is "untouchable". Ridiculous

 

 

 

Woke?  It’s near 200 years old man!  And
 it’s a rather beautiful piece of architecture to boot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111
22 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Oh Oh, the woke squad are here. A building constructed in 1831 which is used as student accommodation and flats is "untouchable". Ridiculous

 

 

 

 

:jesuswept:

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Oh Oh, the woke squad are here. A building constructed in 1831 which is used as student accommodation and flats is "untouchable". Ridiculous

 

 

 

You have absolutely zero idea what you are talking about. It's a Grade I listed building, that puts it in the top 2.5% of significance of all listed buildings. Let's have less of the Dunning-Kruger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OverThere said:

Oh Oh, the woke squad are here. A building constructed in 1831 which is used as student accommodation and flats is "untouchable". Ridiculous

 

 

 

Fuck it, I say let’s knock down SJP and build some student flats on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...