Bruno Guimarães

[Scoot]

12 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Based on Eddies comments Im not sure him, maxi or Wilson are going to be available this weekend.  Bruno is probably the most important but I want him in the role he played last season.

 

What's Eddie said?

[relámpago blanco]

2 minutes ago, Scoot said:

 

What's Eddie said?

He said he hoped to have maybe 2 back soon.  Bruno also said the below:

 

“I’ve been working hard for this.

“It’s my goal (to be fit for West Ham), but I don’t know if I will be ready.

“I know I need to answer this question for a lot of fans today!

“I’m doing my best to be ready as soon as possible.”

[duo]

All because he came on against Tranmere 

[LV]

Apparently picked up the injury against City, not Tranmere

[cubaricho]

Thought it was said he got injured in training?

[LV]

Just now, cubaricho said:

Thought it was said he got injured in training?

Or that. I just remember it didn’t happen against Tranmere 

[80]

1 hour ago, et tu brute said:

Think he is getting right up his own arse. Stick to what your best at entertaining young kids and giving them the opportunity of getting your 'autograph'. Don't know why anyone over the age of 14 gives him the time of day to be honest. 

Was staring at this, trying to work it out, thinking you were talking about Bruno for a while

[Coffee_Johnny]

26 minutes ago, LV said:

Adam P taking the piss a bit there mind unless he’s perhaps a little bit neuro-diverse and doesn’t realise what he’s doing 

“A little bit neuro-diverse” ? 

Diplomatically said, sir. 

[SiLvOR]

2 hours ago, Inferior Acuña said:

 

I did  He blanked me...

fuck

[et tu brute]

36 minutes ago, 80 said:

Was staring at this, trying to work it out, thinking you were talking about Bruno for a while

[Kanji]

55 minutes ago, LV said:

Or that. I just remember it didn’t happen against Tranmere 

 

Nah think i read it was actually an injury he got during City that didn't really "appear" until Tranmere and he only came on for Penalties. 

[JumpersForGoalposts]

1 hour ago, cubaricho said:

Thought it was said he got injured in training?

Unfortunate wanking incident when learning that we were to sign Isak.

[TRon]

@Flip

 

Saw the opening few minutes of West Ham last night just to get a look at Paqueta, and he looked too skilful and clever, a real talent - I ended up switching channels because it was making me feel queasy seeing him in a claret and blue shirt.

 

What I want to know is, would he really have worked with Bruno as a duo in English football? I just can't see it, both are fantastic footballers, but both look better offensively than defensively. Do you think this is the reason why we steered clear? I think if we'd signed Paqueta who we were originally watching, then we wouldn't have signed Bruno. It was one or the other for me.

[Guest]

is Bruno fit for tomorrow

[Flip]

19 minutes ago, TRon said:

@Flip

 

Saw the opening few minutes of West Ham last night just to get a look at Paqueta, and he looked too skilful and clever, a real talent - I ended up switching channels because it was making me feel queasy seeing him in a claret and blue shirt.

 

What I want to know is, would he really have worked with Bruno as a duo in English football? I just can't see it, both are fantastic footballers, but both look better offensively than defensively. Do you think this is the reason why we steered clear? I think if we'd signed Paqueta who we were originally watching, then we wouldn't have signed Bruno. It was one or the other for me.

 

Two different players for me, and two players that complement each other well in a midfield three. Even more so with Joelinton I'd imagine. . Think we steered clear as they realized Wilson can't be trusted and went with Isak instead. 

[TRon]

40 minutes ago, Flip said:

 

Two different players for me, and two players that complement each other well in a midfield three. Even more so with Joelinton I'd imagine. . Think we steered clear as they realized Wilson can't be trusted and went with Isak instead. 

 

That would be a real shame if it was because of FFP concerns, so we didn't want to spend all in one window. I would have thought if the right player, of the right age becomes available, you make the deal. Then you don't have to buy the same player down the line. I still think we didn't go in for tactical reasons as much as anything else.

[SUPERTOON]

 

[Kid Icarus]

We're having a fair few hamstring injuries like. That's Shelvey, Wilson, Bruno, and ASM now I think.

[RobsonsWonderland]

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

We're having a fair few hamstring injuries like. That's Shelvey, Wilson, Bruno, and ASM now I think.

Over reliance on first eleven... No time to rest them without impacting the actual game but then lose them for 3 or 4 weeks.

 

Sods law

[LV]

It could also be the intensity we train at. We train as hard as we play. 

[Myleftboot]

Eddie wants them to train with intensity and play the matches with intensity so picking up a few injuries will be expected. Could be a bit of burn out with some players.

[Myleftboot]

1 minute ago, LV said:

It could also be the intensity we train at. We train as hard as we play. 

We must have been typing at the same time. ?

[David Edgar]

It could be bad luck, but you absolutely have to question our training and conditioning. 

[Yorkie]

Thought any chance of us winning yesterday disappeared when he went off. He wasn't anywhere near his best obviously but he was the only one who was going to deliver a meaningful pass that would unlock a chance. 

[SUPERTOON]

Just now, David Edgar said:

It could be bad luck, but you absolutely have to question our training and conditioning. 

In terms of ASM and Wilson, I think it’s more are both really injury prone players (Wilson in particular). Won’t be the last time both are missing this season either.