Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Kilcline said:

Any chance there's a few quid available by selling some of the loan lads? Saw some report we're terminating Hayden's loan at Liege because there's Champo clubs after him. Not sure what the terms are of Fraser's loan?

 

Clutching and not going to be big money but if it unlocks a small release clause or loan fee etc it could make a difference

Jamal Lewis is probably the only one you’d get much more than a pittance for, and even then he’s only got 18 months left on his contract.

 

Probably the main benefit to shifting him, Fraser or Hayden would be getting rid of their wages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, loki679 said:

 

This.  With our FFP limitations I wouldn't even be thinking about buying from England.  Bruno was £35m or so, Conor Gallagher is being touted around for £50m, it's a huge ripoff buying from PL clubs, I don't know why we do.

 

Only positive is PL players are a slightly safer bet. However our signings from abroad are some of our top players, so we're clearly good at scouting them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Yorkie said:

Diame was poor before Lascelles punched him into becoming worth the £24m we paid for him. Was literally one of the best technical CMs in the league in 2017/18, then was statistically one of the best tacklers the season following. That version of Mo would be a more than canny option in this squad. 

 

A quick look suggests he's still playing so it might not be the worst £40million we'd ever spend.


£24 million? ? I thought it was about £5-6? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher.  Please not Gallagher. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s a Howe player in terms of how he never stops working and he does the dirty stuff well. Receives the ball and shields it fairly well too but I just find him very limited in terms of going forward. We’re crying out for players who are either very good technically in holding onto the ball or very good creatively in terms of ball delivery. Don’t think he’s close to either of those things 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gbandit said:

He’s a Howe player in terms of how he never stops working and he does the dirty stuff well. Receives the ball and shields it fairly well too but I just find him very limited in terms of going forward. We’re crying out for players who are either very good technically in holding onto the ball or very good creatively in terms of ball delivery. Don’t think he’s close to either of those things 

 

We took the piss when one of the no-marks we had in charge way back when said we need to 'run faster, jump higher'.

 

Intensity is all very well but you need some craft to go with it.

 

 

Edited by loki679

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, loki679 said:

 

We took the piss when one of the no-marks we had in charge way back when said we need to 'run faster, jump higher'.

 

Intensity is all very well but you need some craft to go with it.

 

 

 

 

I THREW IT ON THE GROUUUND

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ikon said:

Technical players or don’t sign. 

The trend is and has been that we are consistently signing system players, players that slot in and out of the high press seamlessly. Physical attributes are valuable above all else, and I can’t see it changing anytime soon. It’s why we went for Tonali over Maddison for example.

 

 

Edited by Nine

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we do sign Gallagher I'd honestly be pretty concerned about the long term vision for how we want to play.

 

Actually think Gallagher is pretty decent but he's basically an upgrade on Longstaff but not as good as what we hope Tonali will be for us.

 

I remember in summer there was talk that Howe wants a midfield of three players who are all all-rounders rather than players who fill different roles. While that all sounds very exciting and dynamic in theory I don't know how easy to implement it's going to be. Any examples of midfield threes who've operated like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shak said:

If we do sign Gallagher I'd honestly be pretty concerned about the long term vision for how we want to play.

 

Actually think Gallagher is pretty decent but he's basically an upgrade on Longstaff but not as good as what we hope Tonali will be for us.

 

I remember in summer there was talk that Howe wants a midfield of three players who are all all-rounders rather than players who fill different roles. While that all sounds very exciting and dynamic in theory I don't know how easy to implement it's going to be. Any examples of midfield threes who've operated like that?

Fuck is this steaming shite? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...