Elliottman Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 1 minute ago, NUFCDoog said: Aye, it's starting to look like we're going to start the season with the same squad we have now basically. Absolute disaster of a window so far Still a month to go man, calm the fuck down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 2 minutes ago, NUFCDoog said: Aye, it's starting to look like we're going to start the season with the same squad we have now basically. Absolute disaster of a window so far It’s not really surprising - it’s a shambles at board level with both Mitchell and Eales departing - they are huge roles that should have been filled at season end Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFCDoog Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 5 minutes ago, Elliottman said: Still a month to go man, calm the fuck down Takes us a month to sign anyone man, and thats when we've been "considering an offer" for about 3 months before that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 This shit wouldn’t be happening if Ashley was still here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J7 Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 53 minutes ago, JT24 said: Imagine how hard it’s going to be to do deals when clubs know we have 200m in the bank from Isak being sold to Al Hilal. Saudi tax + PL tax + Isak tax = one unhappy Andy Howe Clubs know Chelsea, Liverpool and City have hundreds of millions in the bank, and they’re still able to buy players. City at reasonable prices too. Personally, I’d be open to selling Isak at £150m plus in normal circumstances. It could help transform the squad. My worry if we did that at the moment however is that we seem to be pretty clueless getting players in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 48 minutes ago, duo said: That will be part of it of course - but he'll also want to see we are strengthening the side to compete. It'd certainly help our cause. I think this is the problem most of our fans have right now though - we’ve become a bit detached from the PSR reality. Put simply, there is no way we can renew Isak at £350kpw AND substantially invest in the squad. The implications of doing the Isak deal would both massively erode our PSR headroom directly but also in a secondary way by moving the dial on what we pay our current and future players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 No matter what happens, look back and realise we’re in a good place and we won a fucking cup man I hope Howe stays forever, btw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 5 minutes ago, stozo said: I think this is the problem most of our fans have right now though - we’ve become a bit detached from the PSR reality. Put simply, there is no way we can renew Isak at £350kpw AND substantially invest in the squad. The implications of doing the Isak deal would both massively erode our PSR headroom directly but also in a secondary way by moving the dial on what we pay our current and future players. Really? £150k/week is £7.8m - we got more than that for Longstaff. Plus if we extend it reduces his amortisation on the accounts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 1 hour ago, Skeletor said: The lesson we have to learn is that if we want to shop at the top table, we have to be wiling to pay what the selling club wants. Haggle and another club will be in there getting the deal done. Also need to be able to offer top wages, which with our current income, we can not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Just now, Super Duper Branko Strupar said: Also need to be able to offer top wages, which with our current income, we can not. So why are we going after those players then? Find our level and make some deals ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 3 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: Really? £150k/week is £7.8m - we got more than that for Longstaff. Plus if we extend it reduces his amortisation on the accounts Bruno is our top earner at sub-£200k per week. I imagine Isak will be in the region of £150kpw based on the fact he signed pre-Bruno extension and that he wasn’t an elite player when he signed. So you are looking at more like £10m per year. There are then a few things to consider. Number one is the main problem is not the Premier League’s PSR rules, it’s UEFA’s wages to turnover ratio rules. If you give Isak an extra £200k per week then MAYBE Longstaff was on £50k per week - so that means you still have to take another £150k per week off the wage bill to even stand still before signing another player. Then you factor in that Isak re-signing breaks the dam on our wage control. Every single negotiation you do after that (renewal or signing) becomes benchmarked against that. Botman, Gordon et al. now know you can and do go that high, so every negotiation becomes more expensive. And finally, it’s very conceivable £350kpw doesn’t get the deal done. I put a plus on the end for a reason. It is absolutely not inconceivable that a Liverpool or Chelsea of this world make it known to his agent that he’d get £400kpw-£500kpw there and that then becomes the figure you have to match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 I really hope the contingency plan is something along the lines of okay, we need 5, but let's spend what's needed and guarantee 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Howe: "We're seeking players that are good enough, that are desperate to come, and that can make the difference but they're on short supply for us. I get that but right now its a ST better than Osula and cover for Longstaff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 16 minutes ago, BeloEmre said: So why are we going after those players then? Find our level and make some deals ffs. If we find our level then we don't increase or level though... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 57 minutes ago, Andy84 said: Fuck At least he’s honest. We’re perpetually playing by the rules whilst others are bending them like an Uri Gellar spoon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 We seem to want the absolute perfect signings without the financial muscle to get them over the line. Same thing last summer, something has to give. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 7 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said: If we find our level then we don't increase or level though... Our level to shop from, not our own level of players. We can’t just keep messing around about a small pot of players etc and not get anyone over the line. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphis Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 22 minutes ago, stozo said: Then you factor in that Isak re-signing breaks the dam on our wage control. Every single negotiation you do after that (renewal or signing) becomes benchmarked against that. Botman, Gordon et al. now know you can and do go that high, so every negotiation becomes more expensive. This is a great point and really important - a lot of our fans are overlooking this. If we somehow put Isak on 350k/wk, Tonali is going to want (and deserve) 300, Bruno as well, any player we negotiate with is going to use that as a benchmark, it's going to lead to a massive inflation of our wage bill and that's not sustainable for us right now. Until the rules are overturned, PSR is a fucking killer for us. This whole thing fucking sucks but a lot of it is out of our control. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 If only there were ways of getting more sponsorship money into the club, goshdarnit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justdoesit Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 This is all infuriating, but correct. Chuck £100-200m at youngsters in the next few years and we will be somewhere close to what Chelsea were in 2018. Vile. 5 minutes ago, Memphis said: This is a great point and really important - a lot of our fans are overlooking this. If we somehow put Isak on 350k/wk, Tonali is going to want (and deserve) 300, Bruno as well, any player we negotiate with is going to use that as a benchmark, it's going to lead to a massive inflation of our wage bill and that's not sustainable for us right now. Until the rules are overturned, PSR is a fucking killer for us. This whole thing fucking sucks but a lot of it is out of our control. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 7 hours ago, KaKa said: Another day another set of repetitive posts from the day before about how we aren't going to get the signings we need in. So fun. N-O invented AI slop posts before LLMs became mainstream. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
black_n_white Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Does the Longstaff transfer pretty much cover the fee for Elanga in a PSR world? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjmc Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Just now, black_n_white said: Does the Longstaff transfer pretty much cover the fee for Elanga in a PSR world? Year 1 of it yes depending on wage difference if longstaff to elanga. Doesn't help for the other 4 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted July 19, 2025 Share Posted July 19, 2025 Just now, black_n_white said: Does the Longstaff transfer pretty much cover the fee for Elanga in a PSR world? First year I think yeah. So essentially as we stand now we’ve spent £0 in terms of this years PSR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now