NUFC Transfer Rumours

[PRL]

17 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Got decent money for the back up keeper as well. I can't remember anymore off the top. They are really good sellers.  

Tyler Morton went for 10-15m (whoever the fuck he is) and Elliot was an obligation at £35m so may well be included by Sky to make scouse numbers more reasonable 

[Coffee_Johnny]

11 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Got decent money for the back up keeper as well. I can't remember anymore off the top. They are really good sellers.  

Ah yes, Kelleher £12.5m (rising to £18m) to Brentford. Plus Tyler Morton £15m (17 year old winger, to Lyon) and Nathaniel Phillips (a 28 year old CB I’ve never heard of) £3m to WBA. So that’s about £197 accounted for. 

[Erikse]

7 hours ago, The Bonk said:

 

Mackem's selling £42m worth of players is impressive as a promoted team.

 

So now Chelsea will have a £1bn headroom?

[Kilcline]

34 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Ah yes, Kelleher £12.5m (rising to £18m) to Brentford. Plus Tyler Morton £15m (17 year old winger, to Lyon) and Nathaniel Phillips (a 28 year old CB I’ve never heard of) £3m to WBA. So that’s about £197 accounted for. 

£10m-ish from Madrid for Trent La to go a month early

[J7]

The sheer number of signings for most clubs is pretty staggering. Everyone doing a Forest. Surely it’s a record number. 

[r0cafella]

11 minutes ago, J7 said:

The sheer number of signings for most clubs is pretty staggering. Everyone doing a Forest. Surely it’s a record number. 

This window was definitely the cartel strikes back. 

[Gh0StFaC3]

2 hours ago, gazza ladra said:

Who was the supposed target? 

Goalscoring midfielder from Serie A.

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

Fkin Sunderland above us on Nett spend as well as the leauge 

Am sick of this me 

[ponsaelius]

1 hour ago, r0cafella said:

Got decent money for the back up keeper as well. I can't remember anymore off the top. They are really good sellers.  

 

10 mill or so each for Tyler Morton and Trent.

[Hanshithispantz]

Chelsea spending £300m and making a profit is hilarious like.

 

Would be nice if other clubs would be given a chance to do that too like, it would really help with the profit and sustainability side of 'profit and sustainability'.

[Sibierski]

9 hours ago, The Bonk said:

 

Mackem's selling £42m worth of players is impressive as a promoted team.

They will have to sell well next summer if they stay up, or it’ll be a points deduction.
 

As their wages will have shot up massively as well, so be on for an insanely massive loss this season. They go down, they won’t be in a good state.

[Dr.Spaceman]

1 hour ago, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said:

Fkin Sunderland above us on Nett spend as well as the leauge 

Am sick of this me 

 

Good job net spend means fuck all.

[mosstef]

8 hours ago, duo said:

I thought we pulled the deal?

We did as we were not sure we could finish the paperwork on Wissa before the deadline.

[Cronky]

I'm all in favour of a spending cap, but that table brings home how ridiculous the effective limit of £35m per season really is. It's been unchanged in over 10 years.

[relámpago blanco]

1 minute ago, mosstef said:

We did as we were not sure we could finish the paperwork on Wissa before the deadline.

Mad that it was 30 seconds before the deadline

[The Prophet]

3 minutes ago, mosstef said:

We did as we were not sure we could finish the paperwork on Wissa before the deadline.

 

Has that been confirmed as the reason why? 

[kingxlnc]

2 hours ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Ah yes, Kelleher £12.5m (rising to £18m) to Brentford. Plus Tyler Morton £15m (17 year old winger, to Lyon) and Nathaniel Phillips (a 28 year old CB I’ve never heard of) £3m to WBA. So that’s about £197 accounted for. 

Goes to show how poor sellers we are in comparison. CL scoring and experienced PL midfielder in his peak years going for only 12-15m in Longstaff. Compare that to the nobody’s the Cartel sell for that amount every year. 
 

Isak was sold undervalue, ditto Almiron, and even ASM. Kelly is the only good deal we did and tbh a Chelsea would have probably sold him for 30m as he is comparable with Tosin who they value around that amount. 

[Shearergol]

3 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

Goes to show how poor sellers we are in comparison. CL scoring and experienced PL midfielder in his peak years going for only 12-15m in Longstaff. Compare that to the nobody’s the Cartel sell for that amount every year. 
 

Isak was sold undervalue, ditto Almiron, and even ASM. Kelly is the only good deal we did and tbh a Chelsea would have probably sold him for 30m as he is comparable with Tosin who they value around that amount. 

 

Who was bidding more for Longstaff, Almiron or ASM?

[gbandit]

24 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

They will have to sell well next summer if they stay up, or it’ll be a points deduction.
 

As their wages will have shot up massively as well, so be on for an insanely massive loss this season. They go down, they won’t be in a good state.

It’s the right decision to make on their part and we’d want exactly the same in their position. The only way to stay up and stay up with longer term hope is to do a Forest. We’ve seen that teams that don’t strengthen or don’t strengthen significantly get absolutely slaughtered. It remains to be seen whether the high risk option will have high reward but fair play to them for giving it a go 

[Stal]

11 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

 

Who was bidding more for Longstaff, Almiron or ASM?

 

He went to Saudi and the scrutiny on us was unbelievable. One of the cartel darlins goes over there for 6 gajillion quid and no one bats an eyelid. We had to sell for £20 million and still the cartel whined and whinged about it.

[kingxlnc]

1 minute ago, Stal said:

 

He went to Saudi and the scrutiny on us was unbelievable. One of the cartel darlins goes over there for 6 gajillion quid and no one bats an eyelid. We had to sell for £20 million and still the cartel whined and whinged about it.

Exactly.

 

He went that peak summer where Saudi were flexing and he was our most creative and box office player, plus young mid 20s. 40m wouldn’t even be considered dodgy let alone higher, judging what some others went for. 
 

I know Longstaff and Almiron had no buyers but that’s part of a sporting director role isn’t it to create demand. Which is why Mitchell did well with Kelly. How does some random at the cartel club have demand whilst both Almiron and Longstaff who have actually excelled at different times at Newcastle in the Premier League have no buyers?

 

Even Isak should have been in much higher demand. 

[andycap]

4 hours ago, r0cafella said:

Made good money on Diaz, Nunez, Quansah, Elliot and Doak. 

Kelleher aswell. 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

26 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

Even Isak should have been in much higher demand. 

 

TBF for some reason Isak waited until every elite club in the world had already bought a star striker and spent all their money

[andycap]

Sunderland were damn lucky to have Dortmund pay so much on a hope the younger Bellingham turned into the player his brother did. 

Because sunderlands team is fucking useless no assets at all that you'd get decent money for. 

[mosstef]

2 hours ago, The Prophet said:

 

Has that been confirmed as the reason why? 

 

That's what I read in Danish media who got their info from Osulas agent I think.