Jump to content

Tottenham Hotspur 1-1 Newcastle United- 27/09/20


Greg

Recommended Posts

Only Man Utd get those decisions is all I heard yesterday...

Them's the laws now, there isn't any room for refs to interpret.

Yep. It's shite. Just hope the posters talking shite yesterday realise there's no bias now. It's just a shite rule.

You might find that the idea of Man Utd getting bias goes back decades, not just since the introduction of VAR.

There's a reason the phrase 'Fergie Time' became a thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cheesy Beans

Lascelles one should’ve been a pen if that one was given :lol: Absolutely zero consistency even with the s*** rules.

 

Lascelles hands were down, whereas Dier's were clearly raised. Those are the laws now.

 

It’s not at all. Lascelles made his ‘body bigger’ as his arm was slightly away from his body. Under the current rules, it should’ve been a pen.

 

If his arm wasn’t there, would it have hit his body, if the answer is no - it has to be a pen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lascelles one should’ve been a pen if that one was given :lol: Absolutely zero consistency even with the s*** rules.

 

Lascelles hands were down, whereas Dier's were clearly raised. Those are the laws now.

 

It’s not at all. Lascelles made his ‘body bigger’ as his arm was slightly away from his body. Under the current rules, it should’ve been a pen.

 

If his arm wasn’t there, would it have hit his body, if the answer is no - it has to be a pen.

 

You’re allowed to have arms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turning the sport into a complete farce. Why bother trying to create anything, just aim for the hands any time you get the ball.

 

The disturbing part being that we were actively looking for just that.

 

We had been screaming for handball every time the ball went near any opposition player all game.

 

Terrible stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cheesy Beans

Lascelles one should’ve been a pen if that one was given :lol: Absolutely zero consistency even with the s*** rules.

 

Lascelles hands were down, whereas Dier's were clearly raised. Those are the laws now.

 

It’s not at all. Lascelles made his ‘body bigger’ as his arm was slightly away from his body. Under the current rules, it should’ve been a pen.

 

If his arm wasn’t there, would it have hit his body, if the answer is no - it has to be a pen.

 

You’re allowed to have arms.

 

Not if they make your body bigger you’re not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...