Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

 

We don't HAVE to, we could always pony up the £45m and just get the deal done. yes we are getting screwed, just depends if we think Phillips on loan will be good enough to do the job. No point in going for Tarkowski in my view, as Burnley will be looking to screw us as well.

We might have to because we’ve seemingly been fannying on trying to buy a player whose club doesn’t want to sell unless it’s at their asking price which we seemingly don’t want to. We should have either paid up or moved on ages ago. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

Any minute now those two @Ando7signings will come through from two weeks ago.

 

Update to Ando ITK’ery:

Teamsheets  

Bruce getting peddled  

Takeovers

Signings

 

Christ do you have a day off? Who knows whats happened in the background, would you prefer he just shut his mouth and didn't say nothing at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It goes to show how shite our scouting is if we identify key targets but then our back up options are the likes of Ross Barkley, Chris Wood, Nat Philips and James Tarkowski. 

 

There are so many quality players in Europe and beyond on relatively modest salaries with acceptable release clauses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat Phillips :lol: at those fees quoted :lol: :lol:

 

I wonder if it's Mandy, Eddie or a.n.other who's obsessed with carthorses?

 

This feels like an utter shitshow, they've got a week to get some signings in and it feels at this rate like we'll be offering Emmerson Boyce and Chris Iwelumo £5m each to come out of retirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the Liverpool supporters I know absolutely love Nat Philips for what that is worth. Agree it would be hugely underwhelming, if not a poor move. Feel like their love is born out of the same kind of love we would have for a youth player coming through and holding his own in our time of need, despite clearly being a bit shit. Think they basically love him because even though he wasn't ready to be thrown in after signing him, he held his own in their injury crisis. Not convinced Phillips would improve us more than playing a fit again Fernandez. I would prefer the latter tbh. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d take Joe Rodon over Nat Phillips, 15M should get him or a loan. In my opinion we shouldn’t have have haggled so much with Botman and Carlos, simply ask how much do u want? Pay it or close to it. Rejected move on. If we can all identify players in an online fans forum then surely the club can. If even the club seen the players we are linked to why not think yeah we’ll enquire about him, the likes of Tolisso, Grimaldo, Kurzawa to name a few. I don’t mind British based players but we need fresh faces and winners mentality. Being stuck to 1 or 2 targets is no use, to then scramble for a back up. We’ve got 6 days left no game, don’t scramble yet just put out as many feelers and fees as possible to CLUBS rather than players. If we sign Lingard - Massive upgrade, we sign Zapata - Massive upgrade. For me though right now it’s a bit of quality and quantity we need and hoping it works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat Phillips and James Tarkovski would be extremely disappointing. If anyone listens to 606 phone in on Saturday and Sunday with Sutton and Savage there's a Burnley fan who always rings up and he constantly moans how bad Tarkovski is. Used the old 'Id drive him there myself' when they mentioned him coming to us. Based on him alone I think he'd be a very poor signing :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...