GeordieDazzler Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Can we not get lots of tshirts with 'Where's the money gone Mike?' on. Esp for a televised away game or similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Awesome House of Fraser has 366k followers SD only had 12k or something. Ha, he's just spent £90m to increase our audience 30-fold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Husov Fraser? Must be Eastern European. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiedean Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 No coincidence that this comes out a day after the window closes is it and he's paying in cash. Hmmmm wonder where that cash has come from The slimy lying crooked bastard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 https://twitter.com/SanDiegoSam1975/status/1027908350040793088 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? This. NUFC's transfer business does not affect whether Sports Direct acquire House of Fraser ffs. They're not all little pots of money that Ashley moves around as he sees fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? This. NUFC's transfer business does not affect whether Sports Direct acquire House of Fraser ffs. They're not all little pots of money that Ashley moves around as he sees fit Most people know this but its an emotional thing to find something else to have a go at Ashley, and my god theres a lot, but keep it factual or we look daft. Sing somerhing better, more questioning than get out of club you fat cockney bastard, then the medi may listen and ask it themselves. We all saw how Ashley doesnt like being questioned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? No I don't, but that's irrelevant to the point that he invests in other areas but not in NUFC. It doesn't make anyone look thick at all, it's the reality of the situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chicken little Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 keep it factual or we look daft or someone says somert unfounded that ends up in them (or worse, N-O) getting into libellous waters. be careful, lads and lasses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? This. NUFC's transfer business does not affect whether Sports Direct acquire House of Fraser ffs. They're not all little pots of money that Ashley moves around as he sees fit Most people know this but its an emotional thing to find something else to have a go at Ashley, and my god theres a lot, but keep it factual or we look daft. Sing somerhing better, more questioning than get out of club you fat cockney bastard, then the medi may listen and ask it themselves. We all saw how Ashley doesnt like being questioned. There is a direct correlation between SD capitol and the free advertising at SJP so it's not a massive leap to suggest that money is the club's money that should have been used to pay for advertising and reinvested in the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Madras and Johnny, you're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering Madras' point that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? No I don't, but that's irrelevant to the point that he invests in other areas but not in NUFC. It doesn't make anyone look thick at all, it's the reality of the situation. Of course it does when many on social media are spouting that that's where our transfer kitty has gone. There's no link between our spending and the HoF buyout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 You're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering the notion that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. He could well point out that he has invested in NUFC., beyond the buyout and paying off debts, like he did with us, let's see if he invests. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 You're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering the notion that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. He could well point out that he has invested in NUFC. As for HoF beyond the buyout and paying off debts, like he did with us, let's see if he invests. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? No I don't, but that's irrelevant to the point that he invests in other areas but not in NUFC. It doesn't make anyone look thick at all, it's the reality of the situation. Of course it does when many on social media are spouting that that's where our transfer kitty has gone. There's no link between our spending and the HoF buyout. Well I disagree. Just because money isn't going directly from one area to another doesn't change the fact that Ashley has a choice over what he invests in and what he doesn't. In that sense it may as well be the same money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 You're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering the notion that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. He could well point out that he has invested in NUFC., beyond the buyout and paying off debts, like he did with us, let's see if he invests. He could but he'd be telling lies and half truths. The debt was there and had to be paid because he didn't do due diligence, the further investment was as a result of the two relegations that he and he alone caused. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinitely Content Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 People linking the House of Fraser buyout to our lack of transfer spend are making us look a bit thick. Are they hell. Linking the club's incoming funds with Ashley's buyout, definitely. But there's a clear and obvious link between the club's lack of spending and Ashley's investment elsewhere. Got to disagree. It's his desire to reach the aim (staying in the prem while spending as little as possible). Do you really think if the HoF deal wasn't in the offing NUFC would have spent more ? I agree, there’s plenty already there to take Ashley up on & criticise him without inventing scenarios with no tangible evidence of their relation to NUFC, which is all we should be concerning ourselves with and using our energy on imo. I understand using the HoF deal to make jokes, but to include it in our cause as evidence of his neglect of the club isn’t really helpful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Madras and Johnny, you're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering Madras' point that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. Everyone is saying that all over social media. The title of this thread jokes about that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Has Ashley invested in Hof? Yes Has Ashley invested in NUFC? No Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Used to like House of Fraser. He'll no doubt turn it into the House of Tat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 You're both missing the point, which is canny rich considering the notion that others are being thick. Where is anyone saying that NUFC's transfer business affects whether Sports Direct acquire House of Frasier? The point is that he'll happily invest elsewhere, but not with NUFC, it's that simple. He could well point out that he has invested in NUFC., beyond the buyout and paying off debts, like he did with us, let's see if he invests. He could but he'd be telling lies and half truths. The debt was there and had to be paid because he didn't do due diligence, the further investment was as a result of the two relegations that he and he alone caused. I Agree with all that.... but it has nowt to do with the purchase of HoF and that in relation to NUFC investment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts